<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3.2.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/3-2-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/3-2-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramp4ge</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/3-2-2014/#comment-114075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ramp4ge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 18:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8140#comment-114075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A sizable portion of the vehicles in World of TANKS are not tanks..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sizable portion of the vehicles in World of TANKS are not tanks..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 113</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/3-2-2014/#comment-114072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[113]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 18:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8140#comment-114072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly. Crusader SP is not faster in reverse than others.
Gun just points on other way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. Crusader SP is not faster in reverse than others.<br />
Gun just points on other way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yarcod</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/3-2-2014/#comment-113991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yarcod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8140#comment-113991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That sounds like skill-to-win not pay-to-win.

Sure, it may be &quot;easier&quot; for you to club baddies but it&#039;s also &quot;easier&quot; for the entire enemy team to do damage to you.

Pay-to-win suggests you are given an advantage over the enemy team for money, like gold rounds.

Now... I would see a problem if premium tanks only got put in matches where it&#039;s on top.  It sounds like by waiting for a &quot;full battle spread&quot; they&#039;re actually making this situation more common... particularly since they&#039;re commonly given preferential match making.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds like skill-to-win not pay-to-win.</p>
<p>Sure, it may be &#8220;easier&#8221; for you to club baddies but it&#8217;s also &#8220;easier&#8221; for the entire enemy team to do damage to you.</p>
<p>Pay-to-win suggests you are given an advantage over the enemy team for money, like gold rounds.</p>
<p>Now&#8230; I would see a problem if premium tanks only got put in matches where it&#8217;s on top.  It sounds like by waiting for a &#8220;full battle spread&#8221; they&#8217;re actually making this situation more common&#8230; particularly since they&#8217;re commonly given preferential match making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SidOfTheNorth</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/3-2-2014/#comment-113987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SidOfTheNorth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8140#comment-113987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yea, and they should do it, lie Blizzard made Starcraft 2 afte starcraft 1, and EA improves there games every year, or even better, like Blizzard makes extentions to the same Wow all the time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, and they should do it, lie Blizzard made Starcraft 2 afte starcraft 1, and EA improves there games every year, or even better, like Blizzard makes extentions to the same Wow all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HUN_Sector</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/3-2-2014/#comment-113793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HUN_Sector]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 10:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8140#comment-113793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; apparently, no high-caliber (150mm) premium vehicle was ever promised&quot;
Haha! Free Sturmtiger for everyone!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; apparently, no high-caliber (150mm) premium vehicle was ever promised&#8221;<br />
Haha! Free Sturmtiger for everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/3-2-2014/#comment-113778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 08:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8140#comment-113778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russians may be poorer... but rember they are PC gaming country, not pathetic overpriced useless console land...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russians may be poorer&#8230; but rember they are PC gaming country, not pathetic overpriced useless console land&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/3-2-2014/#comment-113777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 08:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8140#comment-113777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China has no truly fake tanks. Btw, they too can have an arty line and a td line with two tier 10s
..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China has no truly fake tanks. Btw, they too can have an arty line and a td line with two tier 10s<br />
..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KazukiHyena</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/3-2-2014/#comment-113775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KazukiHyena]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 07:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8140#comment-113775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually as someone with a lot of games in both, the Type isn&#039;t really better. In most ways its worse but requires less overall skill to excel in than the T-44. The Type kind of hits its outer limits of how good it is when it has to do something other than troll bounce people or kill lower tiered enemies as it runs out of tricks fast. The T-44 is a bit harder to master but has higher returns when you know what you&#039;re doing as it has a few more tricks up its sleeve. At least in my experience after 768 battles in the T-44 and 617 in the Type 59.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually as someone with a lot of games in both, the Type isn&#8217;t really better. In most ways its worse but requires less overall skill to excel in than the T-44. The Type kind of hits its outer limits of how good it is when it has to do something other than troll bounce people or kill lower tiered enemies as it runs out of tricks fast. The T-44 is a bit harder to master but has higher returns when you know what you&#8217;re doing as it has a few more tricks up its sleeve. At least in my experience after 768 battles in the T-44 and 617 in the Type 59.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergayisgayhowterriblegay</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/3-2-2014/#comment-113773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sergayisgayhowterriblegay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 06:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8140#comment-113773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, a game has 3 parts (well, this one has only 2):
1. Game engine (which is what supports or not DX11 or multicore);
2. Game design (all the shit you see);
3. A.I. (which does not apply for WOT).

So it&#039;s not &quot;OMG everything needs to be redone, it&#039;s only the engine. And it&#039;s not even the entire engine, it&#039;s the core of it, that handles commands that it feeds the CPU).

All this &quot;OMG, it&#039;s huge, it&#039;s so hard to make multicore, OH NOEZ MULTICORE COSTS MORE THAN CYPRUS, is fucking gay! Same bullshit that was given by EA regarding offline play for Simcity. At first they said the game can NEVER be made offline due to the huge computations that were made on the cloud. Then some wise guy enabled offline mode thru a minor hax. The EA said, it&#039;s so hard, it will take a very long time to do, OMG IT WILL REQUIRE A SERIOUS REMAKE OF THE ENGINE!!!!11111QQQQQQQQQQ Now, 1 year after the game launch, the game will receive the offline option, an option that has been in development since... December last year. Either they were full of shit, like Wargaming is here, or they have hired all the programmers in the world to fix it in 2 months.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, a game has 3 parts (well, this one has only 2):<br />
1. Game engine (which is what supports or not DX11 or multicore);<br />
2. Game design (all the shit you see);<br />
3. A.I. (which does not apply for WOT).</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s not &#8220;OMG everything needs to be redone, it&#8217;s only the engine. And it&#8217;s not even the entire engine, it&#8217;s the core of it, that handles commands that it feeds the CPU).</p>
<p>All this &#8220;OMG, it&#8217;s huge, it&#8217;s so hard to make multicore, OH NOEZ MULTICORE COSTS MORE THAN CYPRUS, is fucking gay! Same bullshit that was given by EA regarding offline play for Simcity. At first they said the game can NEVER be made offline due to the huge computations that were made on the cloud. Then some wise guy enabled offline mode thru a minor hax. The EA said, it&#8217;s so hard, it will take a very long time to do, OMG IT WILL REQUIRE A SERIOUS REMAKE OF THE ENGINE!!!!11111QQQQQQQQQQ Now, 1 year after the game launch, the game will receive the offline option, an option that has been in development since&#8230; December last year. Either they were full of shit, like Wargaming is here, or they have hired all the programmers in the world to fix it in 2 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evi7stylez .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/3-2-2014/#comment-113772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evi7stylez .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 06:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8140#comment-113772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nope, they wont come anytime soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, they wont come anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
