<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On introducing new premium tanks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/on-introducing-new-premium-tanks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/on-introducing-new-premium-tanks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nya-chan Production</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/on-introducing-new-premium-tanks/#comment-114314</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nya-chan Production]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8135#comment-114314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I prefer to see how I improve in the game, reaching some level of play (and cooperation in terms of CW/platoons/team battles) deemed &quot;good&quot;, than to pretend I am the best just because I have better gear than everyone else. That&#039;s the point of my post - I play for fun all the time, but it&#039;s really easy to see that the people whining for reward for every minor thing don&#039;t - they want free stuff without any effort, which is a really warped view of &quot;fun&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer to see how I improve in the game, reaching some level of play (and cooperation in terms of CW/platoons/team battles) deemed &#8220;good&#8221;, than to pretend I am the best just because I have better gear than everyone else. That&#8217;s the point of my post &#8211; I play for fun all the time, but it&#8217;s really easy to see that the people whining for reward for every minor thing don&#8217;t &#8211; they want free stuff without any effort, which is a really warped view of &#8220;fun&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starlight2098</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/on-introducing-new-premium-tanks/#comment-114225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[starlight2098]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 02:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8135#comment-114225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d love a better British med premium - as long as it was better then Matilda BP.  I&#039;m not even buying that, no matter how useful it would be to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love a better British med premium &#8211; as long as it was better then Matilda BP.  I&#8217;m not even buying that, no matter how useful it would be to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Moynihan (Polandballs World of Tanks News)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/on-introducing-new-premium-tanks/#comment-114005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J. Moynihan (Polandballs World of Tanks News)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 16:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8135#comment-114005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With 2 stand premium lines the american&#039;s desperately need a premium. I mean the Germans had 1 TD line and 3 premium TDs fr a while. I mean we haven&#039;t gotten any new American tanks in a long while.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 2 stand premium lines the american&#8217;s desperately need a premium. I mean the Germans had 1 TD line and 3 premium TDs fr a while. I mean we haven&#8217;t gotten any new American tanks in a long while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauschen04</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/on-introducing-new-premium-tanks/#comment-113883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mauschen04]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8135#comment-113883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;Currently, the Jagdtiger 88 doesn’t have historically correct speed (and LFP thickness if I recall correctly)
You&#039;re right, the JT&#039;s lower glacis was nerfed a few patches back, but they didn&#039;t touch the JT 88.

&gt;M56 Scorpion
The predecessor to the Ontos deployment?

I dig.

Oh, also this is one of the tanks meant to be air dropped. So if you&#039;re still worried about making high tiered airdropped vehicles viable, well here&#039;s a tier 8 for you. Wink wink, nudge nudge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Currently, the Jagdtiger 88 doesn’t have historically correct speed (and LFP thickness if I recall correctly)<br />
You&#8217;re right, the JT&#8217;s lower glacis was nerfed a few patches back, but they didn&#8217;t touch the JT 88.</p>
<p>&gt;M56 Scorpion<br />
The predecessor to the Ontos deployment?</p>
<p>I dig.</p>
<p>Oh, also this is one of the tanks meant to be air dropped. So if you&#8217;re still worried about making high tiered airdropped vehicles viable, well here&#8217;s a tier 8 for you. Wink wink, nudge nudge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breakalegs</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/on-introducing-new-premium-tanks/#comment-113852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Breakalegs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 12:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8135#comment-113852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[play for fun. to be the best at a battle isn&#039;t fun anymore?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>play for fun. to be the best at a battle isn&#8217;t fun anymore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugii</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/on-introducing-new-premium-tanks/#comment-113744</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bugii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 22:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8135#comment-113744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- it shouldn’t be a copycat of an already existing vehicle

Like Panther M10 ? Which is basically identical to stock Panther? Just painted brown and wooden boards glued to chasis so it looks similar to M10 ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- it shouldn’t be a copycat of an already existing vehicle</p>
<p>Like Panther M10 ? Which is basically identical to stock Panther? Just painted brown and wooden boards glued to chasis so it looks similar to M10 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Septfox Malkier</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/on-introducing-new-premium-tanks/#comment-113726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Septfox Malkier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 21:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8135#comment-113726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right, that&#039;s why you would have the second module option unlockable for free/0 exp. Anyone buying it for its elite capabilities will know to unlock the optional module(s) to enable elited status, and go from there.

Or, as you say, have them unlocked from the start, but I&#039;m not sure how complicated it would be/what problems would crop up with effectively marking more than one of the same module type as &quot;stock&quot; and therefore unlocked at purchase. *shrugs*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, that&#8217;s why you would have the second module option unlockable for free/0 exp. Anyone buying it for its elite capabilities will know to unlock the optional module(s) to enable elited status, and go from there.</p>
<p>Or, as you say, have them unlocked from the start, but I&#8217;m not sure how complicated it would be/what problems would crop up with effectively marking more than one of the same module type as &#8220;stock&#8221; and therefore unlocked at purchase. *shrugs*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpudmanWP</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/on-introducing-new-premium-tanks/#comment-113717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpudmanWP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 20:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8135#comment-113717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the selling points of a Premium tank is that it is Elite the moment you buy it and can be used more efficiently to train a crew.  If it had modules then WG would have to change the program to consider it Elite no matter what modules were researched.  Either that or buy it with all the Modules already researched.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the selling points of a Premium tank is that it is Elite the moment you buy it and can be used more efficiently to train a crew.  If it had modules then WG would have to change the program to consider it Elite no matter what modules were researched.  Either that or buy it with all the Modules already researched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpudmanWP</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/on-introducing-new-premium-tanks/#comment-113715</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpudmanWP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 20:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8135#comment-113715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[172 pen, not 210.

It basically has 2/3 the Hellcat&#039;s speed, no 360 traverse (only +/- 30 degrees), and only get&#039;s a 12 pt buff vs the Hellcat&#039;s pen.

No way in HELL that is Tier8.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>172 pen, not 210.</p>
<p>It basically has 2/3 the Hellcat&#8217;s speed, no 360 traverse (only +/- 30 degrees), and only get&#8217;s a 12 pt buff vs the Hellcat&#8217;s pen.</p>
<p>No way in HELL that is Tier8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpudmanWP</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/03/on-introducing-new-premium-tanks/#comment-113714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpudmanWP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 20:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8135#comment-113714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not concerned about it&#039;s &quot;Historical&quot; pen as WG changes a lot of stats for &quot;Game Balance&quot; purposes.  I was just showing that it (the same gun as on the M46 Patton) has 12 more pen than the 90mm on the Hellcat.  btw, The M56 has the same 90mm M36 gun as the M46 Patton (a pen of 172 vs the Hellcat&#039;s M3 pen of 160). 

Before you say that it has too much Pen for a Tier 6, the Nashorn, Dicker Max, SU-100, SU-100Y, ARL V39, and AT-8 (to name a few) all have the same or more pen and a LOT more armor than the M56.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not concerned about it&#8217;s &#8220;Historical&#8221; pen as WG changes a lot of stats for &#8220;Game Balance&#8221; purposes.  I was just showing that it (the same gun as on the M46 Patton) has 12 more pen than the 90mm on the Hellcat.  btw, The M56 has the same 90mm M36 gun as the M46 Patton (a pen of 172 vs the Hellcat&#8217;s M3 pen of 160). </p>
<p>Before you say that it has too much Pen for a Tier 6, the Nashorn, Dicker Max, SU-100, SU-100Y, ARL V39, and AT-8 (to name a few) all have the same or more pen and a LOT more armor than the M56.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
