<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TNH-57/900: possible Czechoslovak tier 5 light tank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/04/tnh-57900-possible-czechoslovak-tier-5-light-tank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/04/tnh-57900-possible-czechoslovak-tier-5-light-tank/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: T-17: possible Czechoslovak tier 6 light tank &#124; For The Record</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/04/tnh-57900-possible-czechoslovak-tier-5-light-tank/#comment-115641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T-17: possible Czechoslovak tier 6 light tank &#124; For The Record]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2014 09:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8164#comment-115641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] my last post about Czechoslovak light tanks (specifically the TNH-57/900), I wrote that for tier 6 I also have a candidate. This is it, Škoda [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my last post about Czechoslovak light tanks (specifically the TNH-57/900), I wrote that for tier 6 I also have a candidate. This is it, Škoda [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soviet990</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/04/tnh-57900-possible-czechoslovak-tier-5-light-tank/#comment-114266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soviet990]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 08:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8164#comment-114266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Czech AMX-12t with lower alpha, lower peneration and even a larger hull? How terrible....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Czech AMX-12t with lower alpha, lower peneration and even a larger hull? How terrible&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Szymon Bakalarczyk</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/04/tnh-57900-possible-czechoslovak-tier-5-light-tank/#comment-114214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Szymon Bakalarczyk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8164#comment-114214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pen, dmg, armour etc seems like mix of 2801 and 59-16 properties. Unless its soft stats will be terrible, it is clearly better than tier 5 leopard. And most important: scout with pen of heavy or med of its tier- unacceptable from WG point of view.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pen, dmg, armour etc seems like mix of 2801 and 59-16 properties. Unless its soft stats will be terrible, it is clearly better than tier 5 leopard. And most important: scout with pen of heavy or med of its tier- unacceptable from WG point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miau</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/04/tnh-57900-possible-czechoslovak-tier-5-light-tank/#comment-114197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 23:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8164#comment-114197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nice model]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice model</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: falcon_bg</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/04/tnh-57900-possible-czechoslovak-tier-5-light-tank/#comment-114094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[falcon_bg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8164#comment-114094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe this will be the tier 5 and a buffed version of T-25 with autoloader will be tier 6.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this will be the tier 5 and a buffed version of T-25 with autoloader will be tier 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kazomir</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/04/tnh-57900-possible-czechoslovak-tier-5-light-tank/#comment-114070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kazomir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 18:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8164#comment-114070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This would have made for an excellent WW2 tank.

Kinda makes me wonder why didnt the germans capitalize on the successfullness and simplicity of the 38(t)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would have made for an excellent WW2 tank.</p>
<p>Kinda makes me wonder why didnt the germans capitalize on the successfullness and simplicity of the 38(t)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy-He</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/04/tnh-57900-possible-czechoslovak-tier-5-light-tank/#comment-114029</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy-He]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8164#comment-114029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[9 or 13 shells autoloader？How terrible...maybe tier 5 is OP，or less shells might be better
LT with such speed may be a littlle bad，how about taking as MT？]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9 or 13 shells autoloader？How terrible&#8230;maybe tier 5 is OP，or less shells might be better<br />
LT with such speed may be a littlle bad，how about taking as MT？</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elwiscomeback</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/04/tnh-57900-possible-czechoslovak-tier-5-light-tank/#comment-114022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[elwiscomeback]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8164#comment-114022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not on high tiers. You can say that main reason in TVP project was to create universal tank (&quot;MBT&quot;) , so no heavy here (only soviet IS tanks)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not on high tiers. You can say that main reason in TVP project was to create universal tank (&#8220;MBT&#8221;) , so no heavy here (only soviet IS tanks)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quynh Linh</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/04/tnh-57900-possible-czechoslovak-tier-5-light-tank/#comment-114018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quynh Linh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8164#comment-114018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there any Czech heavy tank project? Since i only see you post about light/med/TD/spg tree i think that may be the Czech don&#039;t interest in heavy tank or you still not gather enough material for a full Czech HT tree]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any Czech heavy tank project? Since i only see you post about light/med/TD/spg tree i think that may be the Czech don&#8217;t interest in heavy tank or you still not gather enough material for a full Czech HT tree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucian Stefanescu</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/04/tnh-57900-possible-czechoslovak-tier-5-light-tank/#comment-114015</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucian Stefanescu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8164#comment-114015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A better candidate? Now you&#039;ve piqued my curiosity. I&#039;m looking forward to the next article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A better candidate? Now you&#8217;ve piqued my curiosity. I&#8217;m looking forward to the next article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
