Comments on: 7.2.2014

By: Hellbourne Smith

Hellbourne Smith — Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:38:54 +0000

About WG way of fuck up thing. Apparently AMX 13 had two magazines with 6 rounds loaded. You could switch the magazine from which you wanted the shot to be loaded. So you could load AP-AP-HE-AP-HE-HE or whatever the second magazine would have APCR or HEAT.

US autoloaders had 8-12 round magazines. But balancewise it would be also fucked up. This silly fantasy game with tanks being best of the game no matter that those never existed or had such problems that never entered production.

Wonder why T57 is such great in pixels but never made in to production.. WOT is such bullshit with flavor of the month power creep.

By: evi7stylez .

evi7stylez . — Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:53:29 +0000

You don’t want to have that mod for yourself but for all hose noobs and tomatos, who don’t get that Assault Offense is only 10 minutes long and they use all that time for camping the hill on Sand River :(

By: Riku55

Riku55 — Sat, 08 Feb 2014 19:44:21 +0000

Regarding the FOV change, speaking as a player who sit in front of a 2560 horizontal resolution monitor, I hate… HATE… FU**ING HATE!!! the new FOV.

By: kracow

kracow — Sat, 08 Feb 2014 18:33:53 +0000

Sad part is he’s not IT smart and he’s able to do this with stupid ease.

I can’t blame him it’s stupid easy and chance of getting banned is next door to nothing.

Wish they would ban the botters but we know they won’t.

By: SgtShidner59

SgtShidner59 — Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:17:46 +0000

As the author of the most current T58 implementation suggestion thread, i came up with an extremely sensible way to put the T58 into the game without breaking WoT entirely.

Here’s the thread btw:
http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/328886-t58-tier-ten-american-tank-destroyer-t110e4-alternative/

Pretty much the TL;DR version is cutting down the 6-round historical magazine to a 3-round (because WG never messes with historical figures for game balance reasons!) and because i think this number of rounds would be extremely acceptable given the Foch 155′s 3-round 155mm cannon as well. Also a nerfing of soft stats would be in order as well, including accuracy, aim time, and ground resistance. This would balance out the fact that it has a 155mm gun IN a turret. Also, you have to realize that the T58 has 127mm of armor…hull AND turret…and at not incredibly amazing angling….in a tier ten game, that’s like tissue paper. Where as the Foch has the armor to back itself up, the T58 does not. Really, the only advantage it has over the Foch is its turret.

If you would take a second to look at the thread, or even think it over for more then a split nano-second….you would see that the T58 could be implemented successfully into the game, quite easily. Heck, they already have the model made for it anyways.

By: Hustodemon Zewel von Lelek

Hustodemon Zewel von Lelek — Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:27:35 +0000

well, some of the ‘hull options’ changed the armor shape and thickness quite considerably IRL, so you would be very sad ;) they are not customization, they should be (as well as turrets) alternatives ;)

By: Medjed

Medjed — Sat, 08 Feb 2014 09:02:20 +0000

Your “friend” is an asshole, but your point is well made.

By: Medjed

Medjed — Sat, 08 Feb 2014 09:00:39 +0000

And it also encourages morons to drive their t10 tanks eventhough they are shit even at playing t2 tonks making the game even more unplayable on high tiers.

By: Medjed

Medjed — Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:55:31 +0000

fuck off powercreep noobie

By: Medjed

Medjed — Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:42:38 +0000

- Q: “Please implement a ‘one minute remaining’ gong in the battle” A: “And girls in bikini, yes”
___________
There’s a Locastan’s mod for that already.

- Storm confirms that 8.11 FOV will appear on live servers (“It’s already too late to change it”)
___________
We fucked up and we have no clue how to go back.

- apparently Soviet 85mm and 100mm guns are still going to be rebalanced (SS: a long time ago, it was considered to rebalance their penetration and/or damage to match the Chinese)
___________
Why not rebalance chinese to match soviet ones? That’s right. Because chinese have 181 pen and 250 dmg. And we all know how soviets copied tonks from chinese and not vice versa therefore chinese values are historically accurate.