<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 11.2.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/11/11-2-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/11/11-2-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/11/11-2-2014/#comment-116715</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 04:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8368#comment-116715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What you are saying is untrue
Though T9 will be fun for Germany.. OP 75, Jagdtiger anihilator and E 50]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you are saying is untrue<br />
Though T9 will be fun for Germany.. OP 75, Jagdtiger anihilator and E 50</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KilrBe3</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/11/11-2-2014/#comment-116712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KilrBe3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 03:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8368#comment-116712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dont think it was Serbs idea, it was Storms. Therefore serb thinks its funny, aka stupid pretty much. Which it is. Its not the real hisotrical battles we asked for. Its just nation vs nation battle, until like 9.2 or something when we are suppose to be getting Historical Battles properly (on historic maps, historic tanks for that battle etc etc).

What this is, is well, just a half ass job to probably see if they could do it and tinker around. This is the beta, and the real game mode comes later.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think it was Serbs idea, it was Storms. Therefore serb thinks its funny, aka stupid pretty much. Which it is. Its not the real hisotrical battles we asked for. Its just nation vs nation battle, until like 9.2 or something when we are suppose to be getting Historical Battles properly (on historic maps, historic tanks for that battle etc etc).</p>
<p>What this is, is well, just a half ass job to probably see if they could do it and tinker around. This is the beta, and the real game mode comes later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperSpy</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/11/11-2-2014/#comment-116698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SuperSpy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8368#comment-116698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Storm states that while he doesn’t have Confrontation (national battles) stats yet (obviously), he personally thinks it’s really funny

I can&#039;t agree more with him. I love these 2nd tier national battles where we have about 10 T18s and enemies has Pz. Jagers :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Storm states that while he doesn’t have Confrontation (national battles) stats yet (obviously), he personally thinks it’s really funny</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t agree more with him. I love these 2nd tier national battles where we have about 10 T18s and enemies has Pz. Jagers :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugii</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/11/11-2-2014/#comment-116674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bugii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8368#comment-116674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[15x IS vs 14xTiger + 1xPanther]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>15x IS vs 14xTiger + 1xPanther</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Smith</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/11/11-2-2014/#comment-116673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8368#comment-116673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amx m4 is &quot;ok&quot; spewing 105 apcr but with the dca 45 its lacking in terms of fire power compared to the tiger1 and not to mention the back to normal french armor.and a t29 might as well be considered a god in tier if played correctly]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amx m4 is &#8220;ok&#8221; spewing 105 apcr but with the dca 45 its lacking in terms of fire power compared to the tiger1 and not to mention the back to normal french armor.and a t29 might as well be considered a god in tier if played correctly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evi7stylez .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/11/11-2-2014/#comment-116669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evi7stylez .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8368#comment-116669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nope, I had never seen so manu lags till that recent fail couple of weeks ago and today was the second epic moment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, I had never seen so manu lags till that recent fail couple of weeks ago and today was the second epic moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oglop</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/11/11-2-2014/#comment-116668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[oglop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8368#comment-116668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just had FV304 .. + 8 churchils + 1 BB+2x Centurion + AT8 ... VS 8 hellcats + 4x T25/2 + T29 + M41 .. total lost because all churchil players had +- 1000 battles and all of them rest camp on base!

-&gt; Confrontation turned off ..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had FV304 .. + 8 churchils + 1 BB+2x Centurion + AT8 &#8230; VS 8 hellcats + 4x T25/2 + T29 + M41 .. total lost because all churchil players had +- 1000 battles and all of them rest camp on base!</p>
<p>-&gt; Confrontation turned off ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/11/11-2-2014/#comment-116665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8368#comment-116665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tier 7 too (because of the fact that, with exception of the French and British, most of the heavies at that tier are simply better than the Tiger and Tiger P in most respects, the T29 in particular).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tier 7 too (because of the fact that, with exception of the French and British, most of the heavies at that tier are simply better than the Tiger and Tiger P in most respects, the T29 in particular).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/11/11-2-2014/#comment-116664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8368#comment-116664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And decreased alpha, but most likely better accuracy and penetration.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And decreased alpha, but most likely better accuracy and penetration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Armourcore9brker</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/11/11-2-2014/#comment-116661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armourcore9brker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8368#comment-116661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The current 15cm in game is only L38. This gun would be massive if it is the 67. It would be over 10m long. 

I think it will just be the same 17cm pak 46 with better traverse. It might make it a viable TD for side scraping.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current 15cm in game is only L38. This gun would be massive if it is the 67. It would be over 10m long. </p>
<p>I think it will just be the same 17cm pak 46 with better traverse. It might make it a viable TD for side scraping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
