<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: German WW2 vehicle found</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/12/german-ww2-vehicle-found/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/12/german-ww2-vehicle-found/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LoserDestiny</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/12/german-ww2-vehicle-found/#comment-117584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LoserDestiny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8398#comment-117584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read above why it is not Sd.Kfz.25, neither 250.. -_-

How come you people are not able to even google-image a couple of photos of the vehicles and just compare what you see???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read above why it is not Sd.Kfz.25, neither 250.. -_-</p>
<p>How come you people are not able to even google-image a couple of photos of the vehicles and just compare what you see???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LoserDestiny</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/12/german-ww2-vehicle-found/#comment-117581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LoserDestiny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8398#comment-117581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No Sd.Kfz.250, as it missed the front outer roadwheel compared to Sd.Kfz.10.
And how on Earth do you come to Sd.Kfz.251? It used a completely different chassis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Sd.Kfz.250, as it missed the front outer roadwheel compared to Sd.Kfz.10.<br />
And how on Earth do you come to Sd.Kfz.251? It used a completely different chassis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FryaDuck</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/12/german-ww2-vehicle-found/#comment-117143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FryaDuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8398#comment-117143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Watchman, I don&#039;t think you appreciate the technology they had at the time.

The Borgward IV was definitely remote controlled and was often deployed at target via a Pzkpfw III Ausf L.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Watchman, I don&#8217;t think you appreciate the technology they had at the time.</p>
<p>The Borgward IV was definitely remote controlled and was often deployed at target via a Pzkpfw III Ausf L.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunshine</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/12/german-ww2-vehicle-found/#comment-117092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sunshine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 01:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8398#comment-117092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ideal tank for bots!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ideal tank for bots!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: havoc313</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/12/german-ww2-vehicle-found/#comment-117084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[havoc313]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8398#comment-117084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suiciding tanks in wot yes please :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suiciding tanks in wot yes please :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr_clark</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/12/german-ww2-vehicle-found/#comment-117082</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mr_clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8398#comment-117082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well if TV Guidance was possible for the Hs-293D Glide-Bomb, then why not for tanks? ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if TV Guidance was possible for the Hs-293D Glide-Bomb, then why not for tanks? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanPwnery</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/12/german-ww2-vehicle-found/#comment-116955</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SeanPwnery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8398#comment-116955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are they sure? The road wheels look nothing like any known picture of a Borgward IV.

The outer wheels look more like a Panzer II G&#039;s. That Sfdkfz10 looks spot on ... so they pulled up half a half-track eh?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are they sure? The road wheels look nothing like any known picture of a Borgward IV.</p>
<p>The outer wheels look more like a Panzer II G&#8217;s. That Sfdkfz10 looks spot on &#8230; so they pulled up half a half-track eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watchman</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/12/german-ww2-vehicle-found/#comment-116954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8398#comment-116954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...I&#039;m not quite sure you entirely appreciate the limitations of period technology.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;I&#8217;m not quite sure you entirely appreciate the limitations of period technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tenno SMGJohn</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/12/german-ww2-vehicle-found/#comment-116910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tenno SMGJohn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8398#comment-116910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Television camera huh? The Soviets should have used television cameras in their teletanks, they should have continued the development of teletanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Television camera huh? The Soviets should have used television cameras in their teletanks, they should have continued the development of teletanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KROENEN</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/12/german-ww2-vehicle-found/#comment-116874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KROENEN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8398#comment-116874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, MadestCat is right. It is a SdKfz.10! The vehicle has 5 roadwheels so it cant be a Sdkfz.250 or 251. The rear part with the coupling device of the SdKfz.250 and 251 also looks quite different. 
I have made a comparison picture:
http://www7.pic-upload.de/12.02.14/15jdbuka5ik1.jpg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, MadestCat is right. It is a SdKfz.10! The vehicle has 5 roadwheels so it cant be a Sdkfz.250 or 251. The rear part with the coupling device of the SdKfz.250 and 251 also looks quite different.<br />
I have made a comparison picture:<br />
<a href="http://www7.pic-upload.de/12.02.14/15jdbuka5ik1.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www7.pic-upload.de/12.02.14/15jdbuka5ik1.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
