Comments on: T95E6 Screenshots

By: tronicson

tronicson — Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:42:31 +0000

hmm, it has a huge turret.. shape frontally seems ok, might be bouncy.. M103′ish – but same huge cupola like M48 and M60.. gundepression maybe us-standard -9° or something

camofactor might be bad considering the size – i expect similar mobility to M48 maybe at worse turnrate

By: Theodosius

Theodosius — Tue, 18 Feb 2014 03:42:46 +0000

Pro:
stronk turret front and mantlet
good top speed(56)
120mm gun has higher alpha dmg(400)
great gun elevation(-9~+20)

Con:
terrible P/W ratio(13.69)
ground resistence is worse than M48/60
very weak and giant tumor(64mm)
average hull front(95mm)

It’s the same pen as T110E5, you can see those data by Tank Inspector.

By: moosenugget

moosenugget — Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:38:49 +0000

All I see up there is people debating how beautiful or ugly that thing is. Quite frankly, my dear(s), I don’t give half a fuck. Oh, you think the T29 is ugly? Is that because you can’t pen through it’s turret?
Sarcasm aside, I judge whether I want a tank based on how it performs in battle. If that thing has the maneuverability of an M48 or M60 Patton and the main gun of the T110E5 (maybe with even more pen… :P), why should I care how it looks? If it can kick ass, it’s good in my books.
Also, does it have the maneuverability of a Patton? I haven’t really heard much about it’s performance.

By: Kauris Azurai

Kauris Azurai — Mon, 17 Feb 2014 17:10:54 +0000

Ugly? pfft. I wish I could do CW. tank is very pretty.

By: SeanPwnery

SeanPwnery — Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:23:16 +0000

Could this be a possible “US Technical Engineer” reward unlock?
That whole clan reward system is getting a bit old mainly because of the ease of exploiting the bonuses.

By: Mini_Marine

Mini_Marine — Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:53:18 +0000

Very few people got the tank without actually participating.

And it doesn’t take half a year to get a tier 10. It takes about 1500 battles to get a tier 10 if you’re remotely competent, quite a bit less if you’re actually good, so if you play even 10 battles a day you’ll have it in less time than that.

By: Westonbirt_EU

Westonbirt_EU — Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:54:49 +0000

The Centurion gives me a boner.

By: General Winter

General Winter — Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:54:08 +0000

Like a logical tanker I like all that abuses slope, compared to early british and german….hmm put a slope on a pnz4 instead of stairs formed armor? Nevaaaaah, make a churchill sloped in the front and therefore getting uber armor instead of flat sucky? Nevaaaah

By: mondog

mondog — Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:40:16 +0000

You don’t have to be in a good clan to win that tank, if the rules of the last campaign are used, which they will be in the 3rd.

Look at the EU, most of the players who won that tank are in scrub clans who have a vaguely OK FC. All they did was repeated landing battles against even worse clans and had enough Tier X to make it work in the last stage. Had they had tank locking like normal clan wars, it would have been completely different.

By: 23r0_NA

23r0_NA — Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:42:51 +0000

Not to mention that the M46 Patton I was quite literally just an upgraded M26 Pershing – initially created as an interim vehicle to train crews for the tank that was supposed to enter service: the M47 Patton II. I could see some of the M46′s upgrades becoming available for the Pershing later on, a nerfed M48 at tier 9, and the M60 at tier 10.