<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WT-E100 historical after all?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/17/wt-e100-historical-after-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/17/wt-e100-historical-after-all/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Novedades del 16 y 17 de Febrero &#124; Wot y Leaks</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/17/wt-e100-historical-after-all/#comment-119412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Novedades del 16 y 17 de Febrero &#124; Wot y Leaks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8524#comment-119412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] FTR : [1], [2], [3] y una ojeada a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FTR : [1], [2], [3] y una ojeada a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mondog</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/17/wt-e100-historical-after-all/#comment-119398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mondog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8524#comment-119398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having a discussion &amp; throwing around ideas, putting out a request for drawings, wooden mock ups, design studies, putting out a tender for a prototype are all very different things.

I&#039;m sure Waffenpruefamt 6 discussed many, many things, that after all was part of their remit - including discussion of the ludicrous ideas that came from mad professors like Porsche to complete nut cases like Hitler. That doesn&#039;t give Wargaming complete artistic license to make shit up then call it &#039;based on a real design&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having a discussion &amp; throwing around ideas, putting out a request for drawings, wooden mock ups, design studies, putting out a tender for a prototype are all very different things.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure Waffenpruefamt 6 discussed many, many things, that after all was part of their remit &#8211; including discussion of the ludicrous ideas that came from mad professors like Porsche to complete nut cases like Hitler. That doesn&#8217;t give Wargaming complete artistic license to make shit up then call it &#8216;based on a real design&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/17/wt-e100-historical-after-all/#comment-119323</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 02:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8524#comment-119323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That one comes (more or less) from an early-war AA gun project. Weird looking thing, IIRC SS may have done an article on it a while ago.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That one comes (more or less) from an early-war AA gun project. Weird looking thing, IIRC SS may have done an article on it a while ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/17/wt-e100-historical-after-all/#comment-119313</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 01:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8524#comment-119313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never, at least as far as WG has stated themselves.


Same for the P.1000 Ratte (not counting its appearance in an April Fools video they made once).  That being said it&#039;d make one hell of a PvE Event Boss if WG decides to implement such a thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never, at least as far as WG has stated themselves.</p>
<p>Same for the P.1000 Ratte (not counting its appearance in an April Fools video they made once).  That being said it&#8217;d make one hell of a PvE Event Boss if WG decides to implement such a thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/17/wt-e100-historical-after-all/#comment-119312</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 01:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8524#comment-119312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, that could work...maybe the Sturmtiger would be at tier 9 then, and the only difference between that gun on the Sturmorser E-100 and as it is on the Sturmtiger would be soft stats (i.e. rate of fire)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, that could work&#8230;maybe the Sturmtiger would be at tier 9 then, and the only difference between that gun on the Sturmorser E-100 and as it is on the Sturmtiger would be soft stats (i.e. rate of fire)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/17/wt-e100-historical-after-all/#comment-119310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 01:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8524#comment-119310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a good way of summing it up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good way of summing it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/17/wt-e100-historical-after-all/#comment-119308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 01:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8524#comment-119308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s an extrapolation of what kind of vehicle it would have been based on available (albeit limited) information, as no blueprints of such a vehicle exist in the present, if they existed at all.

That being said it could possibly have existed, but I&#039;m not sure about the autoloader mechanism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an extrapolation of what kind of vehicle it would have been based on available (albeit limited) information, as no blueprints of such a vehicle exist in the present, if they existed at all.</p>
<p>That being said it could possibly have existed, but I&#8217;m not sure about the autoloader mechanism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark78</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/17/wt-e100-historical-after-all/#comment-119198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark78]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8524#comment-119198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Wafflemaker E-100 has a &quot;right to exist&quot; then what about...

A30 Challenger
Avenger
Archer
Charioteer
Light Tank Mk VIII &quot;Harry Hopkins&quot;
FV301
A7
A38 Valiant
FV4004 Conway
A1E1 Independent Heavy tank
A20 Heavy Tank
COMRES
A24 Cavalier
Vickers No. 45569T Light Tank
Vickers MBT
FV4001 Prototype
AC-1 Sentinel
AC-4

And that&#039;s just the Brit tanks (and I&#039;m even missing some).  Don&#039;t get me started on the French tanks.  But yet the Germans and Russians get paper fantasy tanks?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Wafflemaker E-100 has a &#8220;right to exist&#8221; then what about&#8230;</p>
<p>A30 Challenger<br />
Avenger<br />
Archer<br />
Charioteer<br />
Light Tank Mk VIII &#8220;Harry Hopkins&#8221;<br />
FV301<br />
A7<br />
A38 Valiant<br />
FV4004 Conway<br />
A1E1 Independent Heavy tank<br />
A20 Heavy Tank<br />
COMRES<br />
A24 Cavalier<br />
Vickers No. 45569T Light Tank<br />
Vickers MBT<br />
FV4001 Prototype<br />
AC-1 Sentinel<br />
AC-4</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s just the Brit tanks (and I&#8217;m even missing some).  Don&#8217;t get me started on the French tanks.  But yet the Germans and Russians get paper fantasy tanks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medjed</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/17/wt-e100-historical-after-all/#comment-119175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medjed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8524#comment-119175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would have to agree with that one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to agree with that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/17/wt-e100-historical-after-all/#comment-119105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 17:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8524#comment-119105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*Sigh*
I know that.

BUT, Panther 2 wasnt fully completed and Tiger 2 1946 never left the drawing board. Its not historical. Maus is more historical. IS-3, T-54, T-44 and IS-4 are superior and MUCH more historical as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Sigh*<br />
I know that.</p>
<p>BUT, Panther 2 wasnt fully completed and Tiger 2 1946 never left the drawing board. Its not historical. Maus is more historical. IS-3, T-54, T-44 and IS-4 are superior and MUCH more historical as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
