Comments on: Jagdpanzer 38(t) in Foreign Service

By: Zugloi_Vagany

Zugloi_Vagany — Sat, 01 Mar 2014 08:02:57 +0000

Thanks Cpt_Jarem for this info!
Some “extra’s” – like Your contribution – made the following the topic of the wot-news.com more than interesting. I’ve hear about it for the first time.

By: anr96

anr96 — Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:58:22 +0000

I read that little “note” as the sign of lack of info.

By: BAD

BAD — Wed, 26 Feb 2014 05:43:48 +0000

The word Hetzer meant “baiter” in German I can hardly see that applied to any of the E series fiction.

By: Silentstalker

Silentstalker — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:57:04 +0000

I know, it’s the Bergepanzer 38(t)

By: Leedar

Leedar — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:48:13 +0000

Jagdpanzer 38t gonna jagen.

By: Panzerdan

Panzerdan — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:46:13 +0000

One quick Correction for your reference That Hetzer with the troop on it isn’t a hetzer. Its the recovery variant and its part of the The ROA’s 1st Div.

By: Homer_J

Homer_J — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:17:59 +0000

Oops seem to have replied to the wrong article.

By: Mark78

Mark78 — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:03:49 +0000

Hetzer no Hetzing.

By: mobius

mobius — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:12:41 +0000

Unless that document comes with a Time Machine it only means the US got on board in 1944 with names for their equipment. The British had an official list of approved names for US tanks years before this.

By: Z.G.

Z.G. — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:33:35 +0000

I wanted to ask the same question, thanks!

‘ In several original strength reports the troops incorrectly applied this name to the Jagdpanzer 38 and this was also noted by Guderian in a report to Hitler. ‘
How much soldiers called it Hetzer? Because if a ‘lot’ call it Hetzer it’d be a usage.