Comments on: 27.2.2014

By: Dan Nguyen

Dan Nguyen — Sat, 01 Mar 2014 14:09:56 +0000

Lazy retarded russians

By: Septfox Malkier

Septfox Malkier — Sat, 01 Mar 2014 02:28:33 +0000

“- SerB states that it’s completely possible there is an error in the US M68 gun weight (it’s too heavy), if there is time, the developers will move the weight from the gun to the turret ”

“if there is time”

How incompetent are your developers if they can’t do basic addition/subtraction and change a total of 8 digits in the tank’s XML in a reasonable amount of time? It should literally take five minutes or less to make the change, jesus. Fire the one(s) who are telling you otherwise.

“- Storm states that “normal multithreading” (SS: multicore support I think) will not give the game the performance boost everyone expects, it’s not the universal solution to all problems”

Every bit helps. Use more than one core and you also use more on-die cache and use more of the (currently underused if the engine is waiting on CPU work as much as it looks) bandwidth between the CPU and everything else…

I’d expect at least a few frames a second average, even on systems with strong single-core performance that would have less of an issue with no multicore support (that is, basically anything Intel in the last decade). AMD processors should see a more substantial boost.

By: BAD

BAD — Sat, 01 Mar 2014 00:33:22 +0000

So they’re fixing most of the stuff I’ve got turned off anyway.
Cheerz WG u suk.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:57:09 +0000

Because the Sherman is already in the first batch as the Murikkkan med representative?
Obvious.

By: Loki

Loki — Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:52:03 +0000

50-60 FPS for an ugly graphic game like WoT is not very good. And don’t tell me you don’t get FPS drops in magic forests.

By: Loki

Loki — Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:49:53 +0000

- Storm adds to the issue above that there is no universal optimization solution that would solve everything, instead, Wargaming has to improve things a bit on 10 different places and the result will come. These places are for example CPU multithread, GPU multithread, reworked grass, trees and bushes render, new optimized anti-aliasing, new optimized water render, landscape render optimization, more active model level of detail, new effects render. There is a lot of work now.

I can think of one universal solution. BUY GAME ENGINE WHICH ISN’T OLDER THAN SERB!

By: Duck_of_Death

Duck_of_Death — Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:40:16 +0000

so they chose the m103 but noth the m48 or M46 patton why? they are americas most mass produced tanks after ww2

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:57:52 +0000

…says the man who mainly plays a heavily-armoured TD with one of the all-around best guns for its tier.
Vested interest colouring opinion?
Naaaaaaaaaaaaah. Impossibru.

By: ramp4ge

ramp4ge — Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:45:54 +0000

“- SerB states that it’s completely possible there is an error in the US M68 gun weight (it’s too heavy), if there is time, the developers will move the weight from the gun to the turret (SS: the way module weight works is that although some modules have their historical weight, the important part is the sum of all weights, so module weight itself is basically a balance parameter)”

Because we all know the M48′s so good that just reducing the weight of the gun and NOT transfering the weight to the turret would just completely break the tank. It’d be ridiculously OP at that point.

Right?

By: Nord1ing (NA)

Nord1ing (NA) — Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:53:17 +0000

Don’t they said one or two months ago about new version of bigworld coming out?