<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 28.2.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/28-2-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/28-2-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#124;VA&#124;Wolfenworks/WolvG</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/28-2-2014/#comment-123173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#124;VA&#124;Wolfenworks/WolvG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2014 14:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8789#comment-123173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who cares? the bigger the better, and 14cm is preety grand already]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares? the bigger the better, and 14cm is preety grand already</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turarwanaa</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/28-2-2014/#comment-122972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[turarwanaa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 22:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8789#comment-122972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;musicians don&#039;t do sounds&quot; ? O Rly ? Moog synths and some virtual ones offer a pretty contradictory answer. Subtractive ones, like the SubPhatty I tried a few days ago, are especially good at &quot;sounds&quot;. Those heavily processed instrumental sounds have always been a common source of SFX in both games and movies.

WG&#039;s sound design department should try playing a bit with white noise, envelope and LFOs, as far as warfare sounds are concerned. It would be nicer to have a set of sweet generated sounds than always the same noisy samples playing... but I might be asking for too much here. :)

Also, ATI&#039;s multiple GPU systems are called &quot;Crossfire&quot;, not &quot;SLI&quot;, that is NVIDIA&#039;s stuff.

Good luck with DDsOS, those retards targeting you must be either really bored or butthurt. ^^]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;musicians don&#8217;t do sounds&#8221; ? O Rly ? Moog synths and some virtual ones offer a pretty contradictory answer. Subtractive ones, like the SubPhatty I tried a few days ago, are especially good at &#8220;sounds&#8221;. Those heavily processed instrumental sounds have always been a common source of SFX in both games and movies.</p>
<p>WG&#8217;s sound design department should try playing a bit with white noise, envelope and LFOs, as far as warfare sounds are concerned. It would be nicer to have a set of sweet generated sounds than always the same noisy samples playing&#8230; but I might be asking for too much here. :)</p>
<p>Also, ATI&#8217;s multiple GPU systems are called &#8220;Crossfire&#8221;, not &#8220;SLI&#8221;, that is NVIDIA&#8217;s stuff.</p>
<p>Good luck with DDsOS, those retards targeting you must be either really bored or butthurt. ^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/28-2-2014/#comment-122904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 19:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8789#comment-122904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PROTIP: contently single and indifferent to the Bible here.

But what about that thing you have going with Ferdinand?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PROTIP: contently single and indifferent to the Bible here.</p>
<p>But what about that thing you have going with Ferdinand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rossmum</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/28-2-2014/#comment-122899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rossmum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8789#comment-122899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I honestly think that the only reason it is even being considered is to shut up the swathes of howling fanboys. It doesn&#039;t make any sense to include it from a gameplay perspective, or a historical one.

Giving people a 380mm rocket mortar also opens the door to whining about other kinds of weapons - which is, I believe, the main reason they won&#039;t give us the U-5TS to the T-62 or add the Object 435 as an upgrade option for the 430. Incidentally, the 115mm gun was historically *less* powerful than the U-8TS both tanks have ingame, or so I have been told.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly think that the only reason it is even being considered is to shut up the swathes of howling fanboys. It doesn&#8217;t make any sense to include it from a gameplay perspective, or a historical one.</p>
<p>Giving people a 380mm rocket mortar also opens the door to whining about other kinds of weapons &#8211; which is, I believe, the main reason they won&#8217;t give us the U-5TS to the T-62 or add the Object 435 as an upgrade option for the 430. Incidentally, the 115mm gun was historically *less* powerful than the U-8TS both tanks have ingame, or so I have been told.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myth</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/28-2-2014/#comment-122889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Myth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 18:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8789#comment-122889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yup, so many questions about the Sturmtiger. How are they going to implement it&#039;s 380 mm RW 61 rocket launcher L/5.4 as  TD ? I mean, a 380 mm ROCKET LAUNCHER ... it will have the highest caliber armament in the game and it&#039;s going to be a TD ? Also, given it&#039;s historical stats like 125 kg HE shells and an ammunition capacity of 14 rounds, this thing is likely to have massive alpha damage and a very large splash radius. Is this really needed ? I mean, why not just implement tanks that have been requested from the community first like the Sherman Firefly or working on bring up the EU tree faster ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, so many questions about the Sturmtiger. How are they going to implement it&#8217;s 380 mm RW 61 rocket launcher L/5.4 as  TD ? I mean, a 380 mm ROCKET LAUNCHER &#8230; it will have the highest caliber armament in the game and it&#8217;s going to be a TD ? Also, given it&#8217;s historical stats like 125 kg HE shells and an ammunition capacity of 14 rounds, this thing is likely to have massive alpha damage and a very large splash radius. Is this really needed ? I mean, why not just implement tanks that have been requested from the community first like the Sherman Firefly or working on bring up the EU tree faster ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myth</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/28-2-2014/#comment-122881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Myth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 18:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8789#comment-122881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SS made a post about this last year and even put up a photo with the hybrid view if that&#039;s what you&#039;re looking for. Check the archives, I think it was put up sometime around November 13&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SS made a post about this last year and even put up a photo with the hybrid view if that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re looking for. Check the archives, I think it was put up sometime around November 13&#8242;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TT3Az</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/28-2-2014/#comment-122854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TT3Az]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 15:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8789#comment-122854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your relationshit with ur wife is not legit according to bible.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your relationshit with ur wife is not legit according to bible&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TT3Az</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/28-2-2014/#comment-122852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TT3Az]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 15:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8789#comment-122852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[600 damage if it fail to pen, versus 0-300 damage if a tier 8-10 arty makes a splash not to mention 40 sec reload and 10+ sec aimtime.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>600 damage if it fail to pen, versus 0-300 damage if a tier 8-10 arty makes a splash not to mention 40 sec reload and 10+ sec aimtime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rossmum</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/28-2-2014/#comment-122775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rossmum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 10:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8789#comment-122775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And SS, as usual, is wrongly accusing someone he doesn&#039;t like to try and smear their reputation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And SS, as usual, is wrongly accusing someone he doesn&#8217;t like to try and smear their reputation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homo-Petteri</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/28-2-2014/#comment-122774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Homo-Petteri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 09:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8789#comment-122774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He is the guy from us that SS said made the Ddos happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is the guy from us that SS said made the Ddos happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
