<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jingles&#8217; visit of Bovington</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/jingles-visit-of-bovington/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/jingles-visit-of-bovington/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/jingles-visit-of-bovington/#comment-123544</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 00:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8792#comment-123544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well the point still stands that  the KV-220 doesn&#039;t have a historical gun for balancing purposes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the point still stands that  the KV-220 doesn&#8217;t have a historical gun for balancing purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Lova Lova</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/jingles-visit-of-bovington/#comment-123043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr Lova Lova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8792#comment-123043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was a standard German Tank crew uniform. Tankers (Panzers, Tiger, Panther etc) wore black uniform and SPG units (i.e. Stugs, Jagpanzers etc) wore grey.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a standard German Tank crew uniform. Tankers (Panzers, Tiger, Panther etc) wore black uniform and SPG units (i.e. Stugs, Jagpanzers etc) wore grey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foxton</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/jingles-visit-of-bovington/#comment-122875</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foxton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 17:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8792#comment-122875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That Chieftain prototype does look pretty damn sexy.

Also had no idea the TOG was so fucking HUGE, it&#039;s twice the height of him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Chieftain prototype does look pretty damn sexy.</p>
<p>Also had no idea the TOG was so fucking HUGE, it&#8217;s twice the height of him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawkeye92</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/jingles-visit-of-bovington/#comment-122873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hawkeye92]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 17:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8792#comment-122873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Chieftain probably won&#039;t be representative of the real vehicle. If it was the gun and frontal armour would be unimaginably OP. 
I sorta don&#039;t want it in tanks because it&#039;s entirely unsuited to the way the game plays and WG is almost certainly going to unrealistically nerf it so it&#039;ll be a joke of a tank then pass it off as historically accurate getting utterly slaughtered by tanks designed much earlier.

Admittedly the Chieftain had issues- it had serious engine trouble for the first few versions but it did have a lot going for it.

I also think I saw the QinetiQ vehicle at Tankfst last year- it was an attempt at a polymer based APC or something I think that didn&#039;t lead anywere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chieftain probably won&#8217;t be representative of the real vehicle. If it was the gun and frontal armour would be unimaginably OP.<br />
I sorta don&#8217;t want it in tanks because it&#8217;s entirely unsuited to the way the game plays and WG is almost certainly going to unrealistically nerf it so it&#8217;ll be a joke of a tank then pass it off as historically accurate getting utterly slaughtered by tanks designed much earlier.</p>
<p>Admittedly the Chieftain had issues- it had serious engine trouble for the first few versions but it did have a lot going for it.</p>
<p>I also think I saw the QinetiQ vehicle at Tankfst last year- it was an attempt at a polymer based APC or something I think that didn&#8217;t lead anywere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arcanum</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/jingles-visit-of-bovington/#comment-122871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arcanum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 17:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8792#comment-122871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That`s true. Sadly, history is used and interpreted by the politicians (and other #####)  and it has always been so. At least now we have better opportunity to filter information that we receive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That`s true. Sadly, history is used and interpreted by the politicians (and other #####)  and it has always been so. At least now we have better opportunity to filter information that we receive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaintCaboose</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/jingles-visit-of-bovington/#comment-122867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SaintCaboose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 16:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8792#comment-122867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that so called sherman firefly, isnt that a post-war IDF M4 sherman with a 90mm gun?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that so called sherman firefly, isnt that a post-war IDF M4 sherman with a 90mm gun?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jingles</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/jingles-visit-of-bovington/#comment-122866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jingles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 16:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8792#comment-122866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m actually planning to visit Europe for the D-Day memorials this year and a trip to Munster is something I&#039;d very much like to do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually planning to visit Europe for the D-Day memorials this year and a trip to Munster is something I&#8217;d very much like to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brusilov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/jingles-visit-of-bovington/#comment-122861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brusilov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8792#comment-122861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think they are just another window licking muppet that trolls the internet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they are just another window licking muppet that trolls the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/jingles-visit-of-bovington/#comment-122850</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 15:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8792#comment-122850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It still was not an SS uniform. The badges are still correct for an Army uniform.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It still was not an SS uniform. The badges are still correct for an Army uniform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adampurkis</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/28/jingles-visit-of-bovington/#comment-122839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[adampurkis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 14:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8792#comment-122839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I last read on the challengers forums that he sent them all the specs and that measuring turrets with electronic devices does not work very well because of the paint , well that is what happened with the fv42. I wonder when they will the add the vickers mbt and chieftain.  For me adding them would be a massive leap forward for the game. Just because i am British.  Homo petteri thanks for being a smart ass. My audio drowned out when he talked about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I last read on the challengers forums that he sent them all the specs and that measuring turrets with electronic devices does not work very well because of the paint , well that is what happened with the fv42. I wonder when they will the add the vickers mbt and chieftain.  For me adding them would be a massive leap forward for the game. Just because i am British.  Homo petteri thanks for being a smart ass. My audio drowned out when he talked about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
