<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5.3.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/05/5-3-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/05/5-3-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jiri_Starrider</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/05/5-3-2014/#comment-124565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jiri_Starrider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 17:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8909#comment-124565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;- the suspension parameters will remain hidden&quot;

Ya... hidden. Until I go to any one of a number of sites that pull the data (that anyone can read) from the game files. 

Really do not understand why they keep insisting on playing &quot;I&#039;ve got a secret&quot;, when it&#039;s not a secret. It&#039;s like the little kids who cover their faces and think you can&#039;t see them because they can&#039;t see you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;- the suspension parameters will remain hidden&#8221;</p>
<p>Ya&#8230; hidden. Until I go to any one of a number of sites that pull the data (that anyone can read) from the game files. </p>
<p>Really do not understand why they keep insisting on playing &#8220;I&#8217;ve got a secret&#8221;, when it&#8217;s not a secret. It&#8217;s like the little kids who cover their faces and think you can&#8217;t see them because they can&#8217;t see you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TT3Az</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/05/5-3-2014/#comment-124526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TT3Az]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 15:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8909#comment-124526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its about balancing. Higher tier bristish tenk are good. Not to speak about the ultra OP fv 183.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its about balancing. Higher tier bristish tenk are good. Not to speak about the ultra OP fv 183.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starlight2098</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/05/5-3-2014/#comment-124430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[starlight2098]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8909#comment-124430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;the “friction” (whether a tank slips or not) is calculated on the points under roadwheels, not for the entire surface of the track&quot;

No, no, of course not.  They wouldn&#039;t want to give British tanks one of the advantages they actually had in reality.  Those are meant to be meat for stronk Russian tanks which obviously should climb best with stronk Russian steel-muscle!  

I normally don&#039;t play the &#039;Russian Bias&#039; card, but this is a bit of a letdown.  British low-gear mountaingoating on Churchills and Centurions could have seriously reinvigorated strategy on some maps.  We&#039;re talking about tanks that were well known for appearing where there shouldn&#039;t be tanks, it WAS a decisive trait.  Instead we&#039;re just stuck with the low speed.  THANKS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the “friction” (whether a tank slips or not) is calculated on the points under roadwheels, not for the entire surface of the track&#8221;</p>
<p>No, no, of course not.  They wouldn&#8217;t want to give British tanks one of the advantages they actually had in reality.  Those are meant to be meat for stronk Russian tanks which obviously should climb best with stronk Russian steel-muscle!  </p>
<p>I normally don&#8217;t play the &#8216;Russian Bias&#8217; card, but this is a bit of a letdown.  British low-gear mountaingoating on Churchills and Centurions could have seriously reinvigorated strategy on some maps.  We&#8217;re talking about tanks that were well known for appearing where there shouldn&#8217;t be tanks, it WAS a decisive trait.  Instead we&#8217;re just stuck with the low speed.  THANKS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fido</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/05/5-3-2014/#comment-124394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fido]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 08:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8909#comment-124394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess you know that real tank can get overturned as well. Even when running too fast over an obstacle. I dont know how big pebble you mean but tank can get on its roof merely by collapsing road edge.

Finally people will start driving tanks as real tanks. Same happened with physics introduction - those who used to drive their lights carelessly, full throttle downhill, were nastily surprised. The others were fine. Same here - those who pay a bit attention to their tank charakteristics, wont get surprised. But those relying on fact that they can drive however they want, not considering terrain features and abusing semi-real physics model, will be badly disappointed and would have to adjust their gameplay (or enjoy battles upside down). Good for the rest of us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you know that real tank can get overturned as well. Even when running too fast over an obstacle. I dont know how big pebble you mean but tank can get on its roof merely by collapsing road edge.</p>
<p>Finally people will start driving tanks as real tanks. Same happened with physics introduction &#8211; those who used to drive their lights carelessly, full throttle downhill, were nastily surprised. The others were fine. Same here &#8211; those who pay a bit attention to their tank charakteristics, wont get surprised. But those relying on fact that they can drive however they want, not considering terrain features and abusing semi-real physics model, will be badly disappointed and would have to adjust their gameplay (or enjoy battles upside down). Good for the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herman_der_German</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/05/5-3-2014/#comment-124389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Herman_der_German]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 07:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8909#comment-124389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtfYhQSevyU]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtfYhQSevyU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtfYhQSevyU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evi7stylez .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/05/5-3-2014/#comment-124387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evi7stylez .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 07:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8909#comment-124387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is not a site, it &#039;s some program. Don&#039;t remember the name though..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is not a site, it &#8216;s some program. Don&#8217;t remember the name though..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NaharArkwing_SEA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/05/5-3-2014/#comment-124372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NaharArkwing_SEA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 03:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8909#comment-124372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Autoaim is for SNIPING pussies.

Yup. You&#039;ll be suprised how many players use Autoaim in sniping tanks &gt;400m]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Autoaim is for SNIPING pussies.</p>
<p>Yup. You&#8217;ll be suprised how many players use Autoaim in sniping tanks &gt;400m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JordanIso</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/05/5-3-2014/#comment-124369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JordanIso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 23:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8909#comment-124369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From which site is this image taken?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From which site is this image taken?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TT3Az</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/05/5-3-2014/#comment-124367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TT3Az]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 23:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8909#comment-124367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wish the 2nd line would never come, because it introduced 3 OP high tier tenks, like the rhm, wt and wte100, which do nothing but destroys the balance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish the 2nd line would never come, because it introduced 3 OP high tier tenks, like the rhm, wt and wte100, which do nothing but destroys the balance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stem</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/05/5-3-2014/#comment-124365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 23:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8909#comment-124365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; - there are no plans to make ALL objects destructible&quot;

BOOOOOOOO!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; &#8211; there are no plans to make ALL objects destructible&#8221;</p>
<p>BOOOOOOOO!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
