<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7.3.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/07/7-3-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/07/7-3-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skarakien</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/07/7-3-2014/#comment-125266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skarakien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 16:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9053#comment-125266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and infantry. and planes destroying many tanks...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and infantry. and planes destroying many tanks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClassicFrog (EU)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/07/7-3-2014/#comment-125194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClassicFrog (EU)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 13:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9053#comment-125194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, if you don&#039;t see my point let me exaggerate to show what I mean:


I&#039;m sure if a soldier was caught by enemy commandos by surprise in a shower he would start to fight for his life, naked and with whatever improvised weapon he could find near him.

Though there is no Call of Duty - Fresh out of Shower edition where you are forced to fight naked and whack other guys with a metal pipe.

Just because something is possible or even might have happened does not mean it is the best representation of the typical situation nor a good material for the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you don&#8217;t see my point let me exaggerate to show what I mean:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure if a soldier was caught by enemy commandos by surprise in a shower he would start to fight for his life, naked and with whatever improvised weapon he could find near him.</p>
<p>Though there is no Call of Duty &#8211; Fresh out of Shower edition where you are forced to fight naked and whack other guys with a metal pipe.</p>
<p>Just because something is possible or even might have happened does not mean it is the best representation of the typical situation nor a good material for the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/07/7-3-2014/#comment-125105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 10:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9053#comment-125105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tanks fought each other in cities and woods often enough, I fail to see your point.

Where some arm *is supposed to* and *optimally should* fight has absolutely nothing at all to do with where it in practice *has had to*. People have built siege towers on ships, used mounted cavalry in street fighting, employed heavy artillery as ersatz infantry guns over open sights, dropped paratroopers smack into forests and dragged AFVs over swamps and mountains if that&#039;s what it took.
And, yes, duked it out with tanks in built-up areas among other less than ideal choices of battleground.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tanks fought each other in cities and woods often enough, I fail to see your point.</p>
<p>Where some arm *is supposed to* and *optimally should* fight has absolutely nothing at all to do with where it in practice *has had to*. People have built siege towers on ships, used mounted cavalry in street fighting, employed heavy artillery as ersatz infantry guns over open sights, dropped paratroopers smack into forests and dragged AFVs over swamps and mountains if that&#8217;s what it took.<br />
And, yes, duked it out with tanks in built-up areas among other less than ideal choices of battleground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Han Sulu</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/07/7-3-2014/#comment-125104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Han Sulu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 09:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9053#comment-125104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HAR!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAR!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Typhus</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/07/7-3-2014/#comment-125098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Typhus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 08:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9053#comment-125098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not solid. As far as i know from YT Vids.

@MKultra
- That reminds me, if anyone knows how the uberrealistic WT is doing it, solid or not?
With the words of your almighty SerB.
&quot;If you don&#039;t like it, don&#039;t play it&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not solid. As far as i know from YT Vids.</p>
<p>@MKultra<br />
- That reminds me, if anyone knows how the uberrealistic WT is doing it, solid or not?<br />
With the words of your almighty SerB.<br />
&#8220;If you don&#8217;t like it, don&#8217;t play it&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jiri_Starrider</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/07/7-3-2014/#comment-125094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jiri_Starrider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 06:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9053#comment-125094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guys guys... Google. Live it, Love it, LEARN IT. Yanno, before you say stoopid things.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marines#By_country]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys guys&#8230; Google. Live it, Love it, LEARN IT. Yanno, before you say stoopid things.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marines#By_country" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marines#By_country</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karpo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/07/7-3-2014/#comment-125092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karpo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 03:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9053#comment-125092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why is it that all the best world leaders are here @worldoftanks FTR chat and not making the world better irl?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is it that all the best world leaders are here @worldoftanks FTR chat and not making the world better irl?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClassicFrog (EU)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/07/7-3-2014/#comment-125087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClassicFrog (EU)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 01:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9053#comment-125087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t edit last post so I&#039;ll reply here ...

I am not saying having no collision on the barrel is wrong. It&#039;s pretty functional with what maps we have to play on. 
It is just the maps that are mostly retarded from the perspective of the armoured combat. If we had maps representing terrain that is more likely to be a place of tank battle (aka not a god damn middle of a jungle or a bottom of the great canyon) then perhaps there was no need to make barrels immaterial. That&#039;s all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t edit last post so I&#8217;ll reply here &#8230;</p>
<p>I am not saying having no collision on the barrel is wrong. It&#8217;s pretty functional with what maps we have to play on.<br />
It is just the maps that are mostly retarded from the perspective of the armoured combat. If we had maps representing terrain that is more likely to be a place of tank battle (aka not a god damn middle of a jungle or a bottom of the great canyon) then perhaps there was no need to make barrels immaterial. That&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClassicFrog (EU)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/07/7-3-2014/#comment-125082</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClassicFrog (EU)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 01:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9053#comment-125082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[15 vs 15 is pretty large already considering the size of the maps.

Also I mean just because you can drive a tank to some places it doesn&#039;t mean it is the best ground to fight at. Sure, it can be done and if the other side has nothing to pose a serious threat against tanks then you can use and abuse them anywhere. And even armoured car is a blessing where enemy has none.

But we are talking about tank vs tank combat. Tanks would have go around the forest or city and flank the enemy somewhere in the open. And the enemy would not allow his tanks just to wait to be encircled but send them out to prevent the said flanking. That&#039;s how large tank battles were starting, not because some tanks assigned for infantry support role, ordered not to engage enemy tanks if possible, bumped into enemy infantry support tanks, ordered likewise, just because it was a city/forest/mountain and they could not see very well where they are going, and both sides somehow have lost their infantry cover to scout ahead for them.
 
It&#039;s like making a game about battleships and forcing them to fight on a lake and disabling collisions because they could crash.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>15 vs 15 is pretty large already considering the size of the maps.</p>
<p>Also I mean just because you can drive a tank to some places it doesn&#8217;t mean it is the best ground to fight at. Sure, it can be done and if the other side has nothing to pose a serious threat against tanks then you can use and abuse them anywhere. And even armoured car is a blessing where enemy has none.</p>
<p>But we are talking about tank vs tank combat. Tanks would have go around the forest or city and flank the enemy somewhere in the open. And the enemy would not allow his tanks just to wait to be encircled but send them out to prevent the said flanking. That&#8217;s how large tank battles were starting, not because some tanks assigned for infantry support role, ordered not to engage enemy tanks if possible, bumped into enemy infantry support tanks, ordered likewise, just because it was a city/forest/mountain and they could not see very well where they are going, and both sides somehow have lost their infantry cover to scout ahead for them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like making a game about battleships and forcing them to fight on a lake and disabling collisions because they could crash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/07/7-3-2014/#comment-125078</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 01:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9053#comment-125078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[15 versus 15 isn&#039;t &quot;large scale&quot;. And the last I checked tenks fought their opposite numbers where they found them, even if that was grandmother&#039;s chicken coop.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>15 versus 15 isn&#8217;t &#8220;large scale&#8221;. And the last I checked tenks fought their opposite numbers where they found them, even if that was grandmother&#8217;s chicken coop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
