<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9.0 Historical Battles Info</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/11/9-0-historical-battles-info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/11/9-0-historical-battles-info/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doddy</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/11/9-0-historical-battles-info/#comment-127044</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doddy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 22:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9119#comment-127044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what world is the German side going to have 15 guys?  If it does it can only mean everyone has gone with tier 5s which are all 1 shots for the isu.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what world is the German side going to have 15 guys?  If it does it can only mean everyone has gone with tier 5s which are all 1 shots for the isu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quineloe</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/11/9-0-historical-battles-info/#comment-126505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quineloe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9119#comment-126505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It lasted a whole lot longer than 2010 with the ZIS-6. 

Yes people can be stupid, stupid enough to lose. But it really takes very little skill to just cover a JT that shoots enemy tanks dead with 1-2 hits.

And it only relies on a few tanks to do it. So your team of 15 has 10 idiots? Still good enough. While those idiots die, the JT already racks up kills.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It lasted a whole lot longer than 2010 with the ZIS-6. </p>
<p>Yes people can be stupid, stupid enough to lose. But it really takes very little skill to just cover a JT that shoots enemy tanks dead with 1-2 hits.</p>
<p>And it only relies on a few tanks to do it. So your team of 15 has 10 idiots? Still good enough. While those idiots die, the JT already racks up kills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doddy</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/11/9-0-historical-battles-info/#comment-126286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doddy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 01:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9119#comment-126286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[3 ISU with the derp would mess him up in that time (especially if they get some HEAT shells), he can&#039;t keep his front to all of them.  These battles are going to be decided by how will the lower tier tanks play tbh, playing jagdtiger with a really bad team will be a nightmare.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 ISU with the derp would mess him up in that time (especially if they get some HEAT shells), he can&#8217;t keep his front to all of them.  These battles are going to be decided by how will the lower tier tanks play tbh, playing jagdtiger with a really bad team will be a nightmare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doddy</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/11/9-0-historical-battles-info/#comment-126283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doddy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9119#comment-126283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm, jagdtiger isn&#039;t on the ardennes list, nvm.  Still would have been fun trying to mob one with M10s]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, jagdtiger isn&#8217;t on the ardennes list, nvm.  Still would have been fun trying to mob one with M10s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doddy</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/11/9-0-historical-battles-info/#comment-126282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doddy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9119#comment-126282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He probably thinks wikipedia is a good source.  Then again the jagdtiger entry on wikipedia does describe an action in the Ardennes where the jagdtigers used 48 HE shells to 10 AP, which kind of proves your point.

Of course the HE shell will likely penetrate and one shot kill everything but the Jumbos from the front regardless of any extreme angling (and still knock off half health even on the jumbos turret) and is probably the better ammo choice for this battle anyway, so quite how it would balance things idk.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He probably thinks wikipedia is a good source.  Then again the jagdtiger entry on wikipedia does describe an action in the Ardennes where the jagdtigers used 48 HE shells to 10 AP, which kind of proves your point.</p>
<p>Of course the HE shell will likely penetrate and one shot kill everything but the Jumbos from the front regardless of any extreme angling (and still knock off half health even on the jumbos turret) and is probably the better ammo choice for this battle anyway, so quite how it would balance things idk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zNight</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/11/9-0-historical-battles-info/#comment-126268</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zNight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 21:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9119#comment-126268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I could see this working well if when teams are made, they are taken from a pool of players that have selected the game mode, with no regard to their tank garage. What I mean by this, is that each team has a set number of each vehicle, meant for balance. Then, a player is chosen for each vehicle at random. In this way, you eliminate the German bias, because you could end up on either team in any tank, regardless of what you have in your garage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could see this working well if when teams are made, they are taken from a pool of players that have selected the game mode, with no regard to their tank garage. What I mean by this, is that each team has a set number of each vehicle, meant for balance. Then, a player is chosen for each vehicle at random. In this way, you eliminate the German bias, because you could end up on either team in any tank, regardless of what you have in your garage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azntrigboi</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/11/9-0-historical-battles-info/#comment-126216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[azntrigboi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9119#comment-126216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edit: “By ” should be &quot;By Insert Translator&quot;.  It was probably stupid of me to use chevrons around those words.  :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edit: “By ” should be &#8220;By Insert Translator&#8221;.  It was probably stupid of me to use chevrons around those words.  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azntrigboi</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/11/9-0-historical-battles-info/#comment-126211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[azntrigboi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9119#comment-126211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All that does is make your work half of a translation.  What Wargaming + what you did equates to what a proper translator would have done.  Translations that do not provide any originality aren&#039;t considered authored by the translators.  You don&#039;t see things like Crime and Punishment that are translated into English with &quot;By &quot; on the cover.

I do acknowledge that you did put work into making the information easier to read and appreciate that, but your edits are just part of the translation process.  If you look at your final work and compare it to its corresponding forum post on the RU forums(which I assume is the original Wargaming statement), the content is the same.  Heck, most of the formatting is the same.  SS did already credit Wargaming for the information which was correct and stated that it was passed onto the CC&#039;s.  Also, it&#039;s hilarious that you comment on the stooge and make it seem relevant when most people understand that it&#039;s a joke.  Picking that out just makes your whole argument seem a bit petty.

Whether or not this affects SS&#039;s credibility isn&#039;t for you to decide.  I don&#039;t understand why you even needed to state this.  If anything, as one of your subs, this has negatively impacted my impression of you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All that does is make your work half of a translation.  What Wargaming + what you did equates to what a proper translator would have done.  Translations that do not provide any originality aren&#8217;t considered authored by the translators.  You don&#8217;t see things like Crime and Punishment that are translated into English with &#8220;By &#8221; on the cover.</p>
<p>I do acknowledge that you did put work into making the information easier to read and appreciate that, but your edits are just part of the translation process.  If you look at your final work and compare it to its corresponding forum post on the RU forums(which I assume is the original Wargaming statement), the content is the same.  Heck, most of the formatting is the same.  SS did already credit Wargaming for the information which was correct and stated that it was passed onto the CC&#8217;s.  Also, it&#8217;s hilarious that you comment on the stooge and make it seem relevant when most people understand that it&#8217;s a joke.  Picking that out just makes your whole argument seem a bit petty.</p>
<p>Whether or not this affects SS&#8217;s credibility isn&#8217;t for you to decide.  I don&#8217;t understand why you even needed to state this.  If anything, as one of your subs, this has negatively impacted my impression of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lightball20</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/11/9-0-historical-battles-info/#comment-126203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lightball20]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9119#comment-126203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stock Tiger II gun is better than T32 VK45.02A top guns. And with its ROF in that mode Stock gun is actually better than top gun as 203 pen is more than enough for IS and ISU.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stock Tiger II gun is better than T32 VK45.02A top guns. And with its ROF in that mode Stock gun is actually better than top gun as 203 pen is more than enough for IS and ISU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuickyBaby</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/11/9-0-historical-battles-info/#comment-126167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[QuickyBaby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9119#comment-126167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually I spent about an hour rewriting the &quot;Wargaming&quot; version as it was in &quot;Ruski-English&quot;. 

I omitted irrelevant parts and images spending my time to make it better for the community.

You just copypastainoed my edits and had the cheek to call me a stooge too.

I respect FTR and your work and often talk kindly about it in my videos and streams - actions and words such as this are a detriment to your creditability.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I spent about an hour rewriting the &#8220;Wargaming&#8221; version as it was in &#8220;Ruski-English&#8221;. </p>
<p>I omitted irrelevant parts and images spending my time to make it better for the community.</p>
<p>You just copypastainoed my edits and had the cheek to call me a stooge too.</p>
<p>I respect FTR and your work and often talk kindly about it in my videos and streams &#8211; actions and words such as this are a detriment to your creditability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
