<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9.0 Preliminary Patch Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/13/9-0-preliminary-patch-notes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/13/9-0-preliminary-patch-notes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jupiter</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/13/9-0-preliminary-patch-notes/#comment-126737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jupiter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 04:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9177#comment-126737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw a Foch 155 bounce 2/3 shot at 50B frontal armor . RNG make that happen i believe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a Foch 155 bounce 2/3 shot at 50B frontal armor . RNG make that happen i believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Gile</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/13/9-0-preliminary-patch-notes/#comment-126729</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Gile]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9177#comment-126729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[how was confrontation broken??  I saw no problems with it at all..   and enjoy the mode very much.. Those who dislike it can turn it off.. then kiss my ass.  Their bitching shouldnt decide what the rest of us can do.   Its that same ignorant type of thinking that made wot fuck up the arty  , nerf the TD&#039;s, etc.   They screw over the good players to keep the shitty ones.   If they continue in that fashion, their game will fail in the NA market... mark my words.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how was confrontation broken??  I saw no problems with it at all..   and enjoy the mode very much.. Those who dislike it can turn it off.. then kiss my ass.  Their bitching shouldnt decide what the rest of us can do.   Its that same ignorant type of thinking that made wot fuck up the arty  , nerf the TD&#8217;s, etc.   They screw over the good players to keep the shitty ones.   If they continue in that fashion, their game will fail in the NA market&#8230; mark my words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Gile</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/13/9-0-preliminary-patch-notes/#comment-126728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Gile]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9177#comment-126728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hardly think this is an official list of any changes to the game.. I love how rumor becomes fact to so many..  For one, why would they remove confrontation? They just introduced it and those who dislike it can opt not to join those types of battles.   Ya, I call bullshit here.  I will wait til WOT officially releases the list before I panic or worry about anything.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hardly think this is an official list of any changes to the game.. I love how rumor becomes fact to so many..  For one, why would they remove confrontation? They just introduced it and those who dislike it can opt not to join those types of battles.   Ya, I call bullshit here.  I will wait til WOT officially releases the list before I panic or worry about anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Ragil</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/13/9-0-preliminary-patch-notes/#comment-126727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ragil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9177#comment-126727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it will have the same gun as the Marder and 50mm of armor from what I&#039;ve read before.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it will have the same gun as the Marder and 50mm of armor from what I&#8217;ve read before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lista de cambios de la actualización wot 0.9.0 - Wot y Leaks</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/13/9-0-preliminary-patch-notes/#comment-126725</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lista de cambios de la actualización wot 0.9.0 - Wot y Leaks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9177#comment-126725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] FTR y  Livejournal de [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FTR y  Livejournal de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daathcz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/13/9-0-preliminary-patch-notes/#comment-126715</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daathcz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9177#comment-126715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tell me, what is the main difference between soviet and chinese tanks apart from the lousy gun depression? They are so identical, that they may even be part of the unified commie tech tree (except for that poor taiwanese Type 64)!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell me, what is the main difference between soviet and chinese tanks apart from the lousy gun depression? They are so identical, that they may even be part of the unified commie tech tree (except for that poor taiwanese Type 64)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daathcz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/13/9-0-preliminary-patch-notes/#comment-126713</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daathcz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9177#comment-126713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They certainly wont please everybody with those HD models and havok, as according to their own sources the majority of the playerbase (including myself) wont be able to run it smoothly or at all. I am very annoyed, that they focus on this graphical bullshit, they are even able to promptly shatter pz.IV to pieces..er...tiers etc., but they cant even move op-1s to tier 7 or properly nerf it.

They might also improve little things like game HUD, for we wont have to install shit like xvm to get something as simple as damage counter. They can make historical camouflage patterns, make camonets visible, whatever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They certainly wont please everybody with those HD models and havok, as according to their own sources the majority of the playerbase (including myself) wont be able to run it smoothly or at all. I am very annoyed, that they focus on this graphical bullshit, they are even able to promptly shatter pz.IV to pieces..er&#8230;tiers etc., but they cant even move op-1s to tier 7 or properly nerf it.</p>
<p>They might also improve little things like game HUD, for we wont have to install shit like xvm to get something as simple as damage counter. They can make historical camouflage patterns, make camonets visible, whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/13/9-0-preliminary-patch-notes/#comment-126712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9177#comment-126712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eh, 50 B has a decently bouncy hull front. Too bad people tend to shoot at the rather squishier turret... but even so the hard nose has allowed mine come away from at least three tight spots already over the grand total of 7 battles I&#039;ve fought with it.
Not that this made the Murikkkan autos any less annoyingly better in most respects though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, 50 B has a decently bouncy hull front. Too bad people tend to shoot at the rather squishier turret&#8230; but even so the hard nose has allowed mine come away from at least three tight spots already over the grand total of 7 battles I&#8217;ve fought with it.<br />
Not that this made the Murikkkan autos any less annoyingly better in most respects though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/13/9-0-preliminary-patch-notes/#comment-126710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9177#comment-126710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[.__.
I have no lag issues?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.__.<br />
I have no lag issues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GravityTrash</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/13/9-0-preliminary-patch-notes/#comment-126708</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GravityTrash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9177#comment-126708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True nerf T57 Heavy or buff Amx 50B :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True nerf T57 Heavy or buff Amx 50B :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
