<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8220;other&#8221; Kanonenjagdpanzer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/26/the-other-kanonenjagdpanzer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/26/the-other-kanonenjagdpanzer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kitsunedawn</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/26/the-other-kanonenjagdpanzer/#comment-130926</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kitsunedawn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 22:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9780#comment-130926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was another tank in the same vein as the KJPz. the Versuchsträger 1-2.  https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c8/Panzermuseum_Munster_2010_0699.JPG

Basically, it was a dual gunned medium tank with the guns oriented in tank destroyer fashion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was another tank in the same vein as the KJPz. the Versuchsträger 1-2.  <a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c8/Panzermuseum_Munster_2010_0699.JPG" rel="nofollow">https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c8/Panzermuseum_Munster_2010_0699.JPG</a></p>
<p>Basically, it was a dual gunned medium tank with the guns oriented in tank destroyer fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/26/the-other-kanonenjagdpanzer/#comment-130763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 17:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9780#comment-130763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Murica, exporting cancer since 1960s.

What hath science wrought? :o]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murica, exporting cancer since 1960s.</p>
<p>What hath science wrought? :o</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghost_Rider</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/26/the-other-kanonenjagdpanzer/#comment-130693</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghost_Rider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9780#comment-130693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the M113 went into service in 1960, I beleive that the Type A &amp; B look more like a reworked M114 and not a M113, since the height of Type A and Type B is only 5&#039;3&quot;, (I could not find a specific height of the M113 to the top of the hull, I am 5&#039;10&quot; and the top of my head did not clear the top of the Hull.  I spent 5 years on a M113 or one of its variants.) The M114 has 4 road wheels where the M113 has a fifth one.  This is not counting the front sprocket or the real Idler wheel.  I did see that the FMC T113 proposal has 5 road heels without a Idler wheel in the rear. 

This is still a good read, and the proto-types may be off of the original T113, where they removed the rear road wheel, which could cause binding when making sharp turns, and added the Idler Wheel to counter this issue.  Also could have shortened the Hull height, to make it a much lower profile target, and easier to hide. 

If it was a reworked M114, what better way to move old surplus?  Rework &amp; resell, could be cheaper than making new.  =)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the M113 went into service in 1960, I beleive that the Type A &amp; B look more like a reworked M114 and not a M113, since the height of Type A and Type B is only 5&#8217;3&#8243;, (I could not find a specific height of the M113 to the top of the hull, I am 5&#8217;10&#8243; and the top of my head did not clear the top of the Hull.  I spent 5 years on a M113 or one of its variants.) The M114 has 4 road wheels where the M113 has a fifth one.  This is not counting the front sprocket or the real Idler wheel.  I did see that the FMC T113 proposal has 5 road heels without a Idler wheel in the rear. </p>
<p>This is still a good read, and the proto-types may be off of the original T113, where they removed the rear road wheel, which could cause binding when making sharp turns, and added the Idler Wheel to counter this issue.  Also could have shortened the Hull height, to make it a much lower profile target, and easier to hide. </p>
<p>If it was a reworked M114, what better way to move old surplus?  Rework &amp; resell, could be cheaper than making new.  =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark78</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/26/the-other-kanonenjagdpanzer/#comment-130631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark78]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9780#comment-130631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the E-25 as a Tier 7 premium I don&#039;t see why the KJadgPz can&#039;t be a Tier 8 premium.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the E-25 as a Tier 7 premium I don&#8217;t see why the KJadgPz can&#8217;t be a Tier 8 premium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chiel vd Sande</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/26/the-other-kanonenjagdpanzer/#comment-130616</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chiel vd Sande]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9780#comment-130616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like an ISU-152 had a baby with a Patton tank.

I can hear it scream to &quot;please kill me&quot;. That tumor doesn&#039;t look comfortable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like an ISU-152 had a baby with a Patton tank.</p>
<p>I can hear it scream to &#8220;please kill me&#8221;. That tumor doesn&#8217;t look comfortable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptianNemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/26/the-other-kanonenjagdpanzer/#comment-130570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CaptianNemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9780#comment-130570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is interesting when you start looking at where all of the parts/components for these designs came from.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting when you start looking at where all of the parts/components for these designs came from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karpo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/26/the-other-kanonenjagdpanzer/#comment-130561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karpo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9780#comment-130561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dat Amurican Cancer-cupola :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dat Amurican Cancer-cupola :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adampurkis</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/26/the-other-kanonenjagdpanzer/#comment-130532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[adampurkis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9780#comment-130532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most likely it will be years before it is even looked at anyways. I am more excited about the chieftain and what on earth they are going to do with the vickers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most likely it will be years before it is even looked at anyways. I am more excited about the chieftain and what on earth they are going to do with the vickers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Westonbirt_EU</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/26/the-other-kanonenjagdpanzer/#comment-130524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Westonbirt_EU]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 11:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9780#comment-130524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would fit well in the current system I think ; it seems logical to split the german TDs from tier VIII with a heavy Ferdinand-Jagdtiger-E100 line and a medium JgpantherII-90Jagpanzer-KaJgpanzer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would fit well in the current system I think ; it seems logical to split the german TDs from tier VIII with a heavy Ferdinand-Jagdtiger-E100 line and a medium JgpantherII-90Jagpanzer-KaJgpanzer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hellfish</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/26/the-other-kanonenjagdpanzer/#comment-130522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hellfish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 11:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9780#comment-130522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After WW II everthing was forgotten/ignored pretty fast because the Cold War was starting and Germany was going to be the battlefield.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After WW II everthing was forgotten/ignored pretty fast because the Cold War was starting and Germany was going to be the battlefield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
