Comments on: 27.3.2013

By: Grayskull

Grayskull — Sun, 30 Mar 2014 10:23:16 +0000

Can someone tell him to use google! a 5 sec search on google and i found this

http://www.peachmountain.com/5star/Museum_Tanks_AMX-50_tanks.asp

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/AMX-50.jpg

http://www.lechapy.com/Musee%20des%20Blindes/Mus%20AMX50.JPG

http://www.protank.su/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/tank_amx50-B_france_2.jpg

By: DrPikouz

DrPikouz — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 19:58:10 +0000

Exact.
The AMX 50 history is a tad complicated. Basically, there were 5 models :
- AMX M4 (1945) : AMX M4 45 in WoT ; nothing special here
- AMX M4 or 50 (1949) : AMX 50 100 in WoT ; an AMX M4 45 reworked hull with an oscillating turret, sources concerning the name are unclear :/
- AMX 50 120 (1953) : not in WoT ; AMX 50 (1949) uparmored hull with a NORMAL turret, 120 mm gun
- AMX 50 120 (1955) : AMX 50 120 in WoT ; pike nosed hull, oscillating turret, 120 mm gun
- AMX 50 120 (1958) : AMX 50 B in WoT ; lowered hull

The model in Saumur is actually an AMX 50 120 (1958). And, good God, how huge is this thing …
A very interesting history of the AMX 50′s development can be found on this site (in french) :
http://www.chars-francais.net/new/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1272&Itemid=102
Very interesting read for all the French tanks fans here.

By: randyzie

randyzie — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 19:12:36 +0000

nVidia announced all fermi and later cards will support dx12. So, in theory all dx11 cards = dx12

By: yowanx7

yowanx7 — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:49:43 +0000

It’s actually the other way around.

By: Alexander Yordanov

Alexander Yordanov — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:58:25 +0000

You are.
Last Light uses some of the best damn textures I have ever seen… along with THE best lightning I have ever seen…
Maybe animation quality (which is not bad actually, just not great) and the only decent AI is what keeps it from being the most advanced game now.
Crysis 3 has similar textures, better animation almost as good lightning, AI that is worse… though not terrible either.
Both have about the same object LOD … if this can even be measured.

STALKER is old, but it holds up in both textures, object LoD and ESPECIALLY lightning.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAYLHAPPkvw&list=PLD2B82E405CF9650C&index=4
Dear god the rains and storms..

By: Paratrooper1n0

Paratrooper1n0 — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:46:33 +0000

You are mistaking subjective with objective. There are objectively superior looking games that do not use bland objects and textures.

By: Phaethon666

Phaethon666 — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:20:34 +0000

Well, I wouldn’t call my internet slow here in the USA. Typically dl at no less than 2.5 megabytes per sec, it seems to cap at around 5. but at those speeds nothing ever takes very long to download.

By: Alexander Yordanov

Alexander Yordanov — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:57:36 +0000

So you want aesthetically pleasing games? That is different and SUBJECTIVE.

Graphical fidelity mostly is not.

Ohh and Last Light not having great fidelity… lol…

By: flashmozzg

flashmozzg — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:51:38 +0000

It’s not 50B (BBBBBB)

By: flashmozzg

flashmozzg — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:49:44 +0000

Better water (it was crap in bf3) and particles + some minor effects. Complexity of maps/ destruction increased a bit. But , yeah, apart from that – no real improvement. But only compared to how bc2 – bf3 leap was.