Comments on: 9.0 Test (Test 2) – Changes to Historical Battles http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/27/9-0-test-test-2-changes-to-historical-battles/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: Karpo http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/27/9-0-test-test-2-changes-to-historical-battles/#comment-131675 Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:49:18 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9878#comment-131675 THEY STILL DIDN’T FIX THE PZ: III CAMO!!!!!!!!! >:|

]]> By: nico203 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/27/9-0-test-test-2-changes-to-historical-battles/#comment-131648 Fri, 28 Mar 2014 08:59:48 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9878#comment-131648 Yeah i know i have both in garage lol. Well the ISU-152 ok but the su-122 can be placed removing that silly su122b(correct me il the name is wrong) like “splitting the actual su-85 in su-85 and su-122 no?

]]> By: Nord1ing (NA) http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/27/9-0-test-test-2-changes-to-historical-battles/#comment-131647 Fri, 28 Mar 2014 08:59:23 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9878#comment-131647 T10 tomato?

]]> By: Nord1ing (NA) http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/27/9-0-test-test-2-changes-to-historical-battles/#comment-131646 Fri, 28 Mar 2014 08:57:46 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9878#comment-131646 Sure, you lost a lot in team battle?:D

]]> By: RedShocktrooper http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/27/9-0-test-test-2-changes-to-historical-battles/#comment-131644 Fri, 28 Mar 2014 08:55:36 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9878#comment-131644 Those are both already in game as tank destroyers.

]]> By: nico203 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/27/9-0-test-test-2-changes-to-historical-battles/#comment-131629 Fri, 28 Mar 2014 08:13:43 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9878#comment-131629 Actually they can give soviet theyr fucking real spgs like su-122 and ISU-152 instead searching for stupid prototypes

]]> By: Doddy http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/27/9-0-test-test-2-changes-to-historical-battles/#comment-131606 Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:58:01 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9878#comment-131606 Is that because they removed jagdtiger ipwnmobile or because they gave T-34 two extra apcr?

]]> By: Doddy http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/27/9-0-test-test-2-changes-to-historical-battles/#comment-131604 Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:56:33 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9878#comment-131604 They seem to have made the decision to leave arty out of HB. Unsurprising since it iwll lead to teams with arty vs teams without (soviet spg line has like 1 vehicle that saw action with a prototype once or something stupid like that) and they have always hated that (special MM rules on it in randoms).

]]> By: Doddy http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/27/9-0-test-test-2-changes-to-historical-battles/#comment-131603 Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:52:27 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9878#comment-131603 Eh? Hadn’t they mostly upgraded to tiger 2 by then?

]]> By: deveen23 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/27/9-0-test-test-2-changes-to-historical-battles/#comment-131482 Thu, 27 Mar 2014 20:03:40 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=9878#comment-131482 “There were only 2 units with Tiger Is in the area of the Ardennes but only one of them saw action in the battles. ”

http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?p=1639877#p1639877

]]>