Comments on: T-54 Turret Armor in 9.0

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Sat, 29 Mar 2014 15:16:28 +0000

Please get the stick out of your ass and engage brain before posting next time. The Wafflemonster uses a slightly modified E-100 hull with the same armour, while the gunhouse is so thin it is wholly irrelevant in regards to protection how they’ll model it in HD because literally *everything* will go through anyway.

Also not even the most made-up critter in the roster, since both of the component parts certifiably existed and even if putting them together was never proposed IRL it oughta been technically doable.

And Hitler had to be *talked out* of pursuing far more idiotic projects so eh.

By: Luka Gašparović

Luka Gašparović — Sat, 29 Mar 2014 14:06:16 +0000

Fu you WG

By: GoogleUser34

GoogleUser34 — Sat, 29 Mar 2014 08:55:34 +0000

This would work if every tank model in the game was historical. Unfortunately, WG started with paper-projects that never existed to fill holes where real tanks would never fit in the tech trees. And this practice kept getting worse, and worse, until the pinnacle of non-historical, the WT E-100. Never drawn, never proposed, and only the barest line of text outlining a future of potential projects on the E-series hulls. One, of which, was a TD version. The JP E-100 is the tank imagined for the proposal. So, the WT E-100 is a ‘what if, instead of a logical TD design, the german tank design bureau all took some acid and absinthe and came up a Frankenstein that even Hitler would have rejected’.

Yes, the HD remodel of the WT E-100 with respect to historical realism will be hilarious.

By: your Night MARE

your Night MARE — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:50:03 +0000

Real sad that the T-54s armor gets nerfed, and not the HEAT round. “More realistic”? It’s WoT, they threw all “historical accuracy” overboard long ago, so imo they should only nerf/buff depending on the vehicles performance and not some silly RL numbers.

By: Stronk_tenk

Stronk_tenk — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:49:35 +0000

Whether it’s wrong or not isnt the point, she knows very well that by wrong I mean with WG changing the turret, I have no idea if it’s historical or not. She’s a troll or worse just a nut job, she single handedly makes the US forums and the t110 thread unreadable with constant snide comments and horrible attitude.

By: alex sonny

alex sonny — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:48:55 +0000

It’s okay, it still plays well on test server. 155mm guns still bounce, calm your titties :D

By: alex sonny

alex sonny — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:48:02 +0000

Yeah, and they nerfed superpershing into the core of the earth. Screw them, not touching type for no reason.

By: alex sonny

alex sonny — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:43:22 +0000

Exactly. Even the cupola bounced a few shots.
This is a lot more realistic too, because you never have sharp transitions in armour thickness, it’s a single cast with smooth transitions, think of it as a gradient – from 200 to 150 mm gradually. Now for a realistic model there would have to be 1mm strips, but that wouldn’t work well so here’s a compromise. It’s actually pretty well done.

By: alex sonny

alex sonny — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:40:58 +0000

Ignorant means not-knowing. She wasn’t insulting you, she was pointing out that you were misinformed. Read more comments below to find the answer to your question :)

By: Stronk_tenk

Stronk_tenk — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:34:40 +0000

Is it wrong for narcissistic fascists as well?