<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hungarian Toldi II LT with 44M. Buzogányvető anti-tank rocket launcher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/02/hungarian-toldi-ii-lt-with-44m-buzoganyveto-anti-tank-rocket-launcher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/02/hungarian-toldi-ii-lt-with-44m-buzoganyveto-anti-tank-rocket-launcher/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karika</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/02/hungarian-toldi-ii-lt-with-44m-buzoganyveto-anti-tank-rocket-launcher/#comment-133960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karika]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 07:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10063#comment-133960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are right, although the Katyhusha rockets were not anti-tank type rocket, they were used mostly against live force. The statement is about the &#039;heavy&#039; AT rockets, and their development was not finished nor by the Soviets, neighter by the other Allied countries before the end of the war.

However I took that part which states that we Hungarians were the the second or third, whatever in the combat usage of the rockets, but it seems it&#039;s author was wrong, and I didn&#039;t looked after it enough. Sorry. Nevertheless, we were amongst the firsts :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right, although the Katyhusha rockets were not anti-tank type rocket, they were used mostly against live force. The statement is about the &#8216;heavy&#8217; AT rockets, and their development was not finished nor by the Soviets, neighter by the other Allied countries before the end of the war.</p>
<p>However I took that part which states that we Hungarians were the the second or third, whatever in the combat usage of the rockets, but it seems it&#8217;s author was wrong, and I didn&#8217;t looked after it enough. Sorry. Nevertheless, we were amongst the firsts :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladimir Shoulzhenko</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/02/hungarian-toldi-ii-lt-with-44m-buzoganyveto-anti-tank-rocket-launcher/#comment-133717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vladimir Shoulzhenko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 16:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10063#comment-133717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weren&#039;t Russian Katyusha rockets, like, waaay before 1944 ? Like, 1938 ? My gramps was actually one of the engineers that helped develop/improve propulsion system for rockets Katyusha was designed to launch...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weren&#8217;t Russian Katyusha rockets, like, waaay before 1944 ? Like, 1938 ? My gramps was actually one of the engineers that helped develop/improve propulsion system for rockets Katyusha was designed to launch&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: comstedt</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/02/hungarian-toldi-ii-lt-with-44m-buzoganyveto-anti-tank-rocket-launcher/#comment-133344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[comstedt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 14:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10063#comment-133344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[strum......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>strum&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apolloF117 .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/02/hungarian-toldi-ii-lt-with-44m-buzoganyveto-anti-tank-rocket-launcher/#comment-133321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[apolloF117 .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 12:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10063#comment-133321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[can i have one? t95 would be happy with me :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can i have one? t95 would be happy with me :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fegelpanzer</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/02/hungarian-toldi-ii-lt-with-44m-buzoganyveto-anti-tank-rocket-launcher/#comment-133312</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fegelpanzer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 12:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10063#comment-133312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And a bit of Panzerwerfer:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And a bit of Panzerwerfer:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exocet6951</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/02/hungarian-toldi-ii-lt-with-44m-buzoganyveto-anti-tank-rocket-launcher/#comment-133307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[exocet6951]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 12:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10063#comment-133307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 2% combat hit rate when mounted on IL-2s is not that bad.
Imagine those same rockets used on stable platform (infantryman&#039;s shoulder)  at 50m fighting range...

There&#039;s probably a good reason, I just can&#039;t see it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 2% combat hit rate when mounted on IL-2s is not that bad.<br />
Imagine those same rockets used on stable platform (infantryman&#8217;s shoulder)  at 50m fighting range&#8230;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s probably a good reason, I just can&#8217;t see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schepel</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/02/hungarian-toldi-ii-lt-with-44m-buzoganyveto-anti-tank-rocket-launcher/#comment-133300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schepel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 12:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10063#comment-133300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Russians got rockets alright, but efficient they were not. :-) They were usually spammed at a target area, rather than a specific target and their main use in combat was apparently the effect on enemy morale.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Russians got rockets alright, but efficient they were not. :-) They were usually spammed at a target area, rather than a specific target and their main use in combat was apparently the effect on enemy morale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karika</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/02/hungarian-toldi-ii-lt-with-44m-buzoganyveto-anti-tank-rocket-launcher/#comment-133293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karika]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 11:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10063#comment-133293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve never heard about those rockets before, but you&#039;re right. When were those rockets first usage btw?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never heard about those rockets before, but you&#8217;re right. When were those rockets first usage btw?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bojan</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/02/hungarian-toldi-ii-lt-with-44m-buzoganyveto-anti-tank-rocket-launcher/#comment-133274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bojan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 11:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10063#comment-133274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Soviets experimented with ground launched RS-82/132 rockets, those launchers were used in combat. Accuracy was too bad for reliable shooting at tanks, which is something that would appear as a problem with Hungarian launcher also.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soviets experimented with ground launched RS-82/132 rockets, those launchers were used in combat. Accuracy was too bad for reliable shooting at tanks, which is something that would appear as a problem with Hungarian launcher also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exocet6951</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/02/hungarian-toldi-ii-lt-with-44m-buzoganyveto-anti-tank-rocket-launcher/#comment-133267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[exocet6951]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 10:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10063#comment-133267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;With this development, Hungary was the third nation, after Germany and the USA, who used domestically designed rocket launcher systems in the World War II&quot;

I find that hard to believe, considering the abundance of Soviet-made rockets fitted to planes, tanks, trucks, and basically anything that could move except for infantry. Because fuck Red Army infantry apparently. 

&quot;Here are more AT rifles Yuri&quot;
&quot;Do you think we could have those fancy, cheap as hell and pretty efficient rockets?&quot;
&quot;No, you get more complicated, heavy and quite inefficient AT rifles. Also, Gulag, since you complained&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;With this development, Hungary was the third nation, after Germany and the USA, who used domestically designed rocket launcher systems in the World War II&#8221;</p>
<p>I find that hard to believe, considering the abundance of Soviet-made rockets fitted to planes, tanks, trucks, and basically anything that could move except for infantry. Because fuck Red Army infantry apparently. </p>
<p>&#8220;Here are more AT rifles Yuri&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Do you think we could have those fancy, cheap as hell and pretty efficient rockets?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;No, you get more complicated, heavy and quite inefficient AT rifles. Also, Gulag, since you complained&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
