<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3.4.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/03/3-4-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/03/3-4-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MemoFromTurner</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/03/3-4-2014/#comment-134398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MemoFromTurner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 22:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10192#comment-134398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;ll be even cooler if they buff the speed up to the historical value of the 80km/h or they give a choice of turrets allowing a mixture of playing styles:

http://www.jedsite.info/tanks-echo/echo/elc_series/elc-series.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll be even cooler if they buff the speed up to the historical value of the 80km/h or they give a choice of turrets allowing a mixture of playing styles:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jedsite.info/tanks-echo/echo/elc_series/elc-series.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.jedsite.info/tanks-echo/echo/elc_series/elc-series.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TT3Az</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/03/3-4-2014/#comment-134146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TT3Az]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10192#comment-134146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is3 dont have 400m view range and even if it would have the it would get spotted more often due to worse camo factor than a scout. Scouts in the same tiers are OP as fuck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is3 dont have 400m view range and even if it would have the it would get spotted more often due to worse camo factor than a scout. Scouts in the same tiers are OP as fuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/03/3-4-2014/#comment-134101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10192#comment-134101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m guessing the bit about laser rangefinder is the clincher. The AMX-13/90 didn&#039;t get one before the LRF version.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing the bit about laser rangefinder is the clincher. The AMX-13/90 didn&#8217;t get one before the LRF version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/03/3-4-2014/#comment-134100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10192#comment-134100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What? The Kürassier basically shares turret with the AMX-13/105, barillet autoloaders ahoy.

And if it&#039;s the AMX-30 you&#039;re taling about, get real. 105mm is literally universal for all top-tier &quot;western&quot; tanks already.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? The Kürassier basically shares turret with the AMX-13/105, barillet autoloaders ahoy.</p>
<p>And if it&#8217;s the AMX-30 you&#8217;re taling about, get real. 105mm is literally universal for all top-tier &#8220;western&#8221; tanks already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/03/3-4-2014/#comment-134098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10192#comment-134098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IIRC the Abrams carries ALL of its ammo in the turret bustle, which is somewhat unique and the direct reason that part&#039;s so bloody humongous. I got the impression most other (non-Soviet) designs split the load between a ready-access rack (or autoloader magazine in at least one case) in the bustle and the rest in the hull.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IIRC the Abrams carries ALL of its ammo in the turret bustle, which is somewhat unique and the direct reason that part&#8217;s so bloody humongous. I got the impression most other (non-Soviet) designs split the load between a ready-access rack (or autoloader magazine in at least one case) in the bustle and the rest in the hull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tsunami1</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/03/3-4-2014/#comment-134085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tsunami1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 12:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10192#comment-134085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ELC needs no buff. Or nerf. It is perfectly fine as it is, and it&#039;s the best fun you can have with your pants on. Please don&#039;t touch ELC]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ELC needs no buff. Or nerf. It is perfectly fine as it is, and it&#8217;s the best fun you can have with your pants on. Please don&#8217;t touch ELC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themuddyside</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/03/3-4-2014/#comment-133975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themuddyside]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 08:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10192#comment-133975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually imo I think they are the best tanks to drive, they are the ones that can really flank in this game at the moment because the map size issue, only with speed and stealth you can achieve effective flanking in some of the maps. And having a scout alive in the middle/end of the game doing spotting is a match winner.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually imo I think they are the best tanks to drive, they are the ones that can really flank in this game at the moment because the map size issue, only with speed and stealth you can achieve effective flanking in some of the maps. And having a scout alive in the middle/end of the game doing spotting is a match winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themuddyside</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/03/3-4-2014/#comment-133972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themuddyside]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 08:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10192#comment-133972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please dont touch the Chaffee, it is ok to do any cosmetic changes, but the MM is fine, I&#039;d love chasing tier X top tiers :-) ... some more top speed will be good and a little more power will be welcome.
But really, for the Chaffee, the only thing that is needed is to change the credit making, at the moment it costs money to run this tank.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please dont touch the Chaffee, it is ok to do any cosmetic changes, but the MM is fine, I&#8217;d love chasing tier X top tiers :-) &#8230; some more top speed will be good and a little more power will be welcome.<br />
But really, for the Chaffee, the only thing that is needed is to change the credit making, at the moment it costs money to run this tank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baldrickk</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/03/3-4-2014/#comment-133951</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldrickk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 07:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10192#comment-133951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who cares? It&#039;s just a name on the garage interface.
It&#039;s the tanks I&#039;m interested in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares? It&#8217;s just a name on the garage interface.<br />
It&#8217;s the tanks I&#8217;m interested in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpeedyCraft51</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/03/3-4-2014/#comment-133947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpeedyCraft51]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 06:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10192#comment-133947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because wargaming said long ago that french will get another heavy line, and maybe another medium one, and after a year and months, we still wait for it ^^]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because wargaming said long ago that french will get another heavy line, and maybe another medium one, and after a year and months, we still wait for it ^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
