<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another WoT Fake Model Kit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/another-wot-fake-model-kit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/another-wot-fake-model-kit/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otto-matic Reiffel</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/another-wot-fake-model-kit/#comment-137949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Otto-matic Reiffel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 01:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10623#comment-137949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m OK with them making this provided they point out that it was never planned, etc. It&#039;s when they start making up stories about how awesome it was (see Krokodil) that I start to get annoyed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m OK with them making this provided they point out that it was never planned, etc. It&#8217;s when they start making up stories about how awesome it was (see Krokodil) that I start to get annoyed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ViktorKitov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/another-wot-fake-model-kit/#comment-137935</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ViktorKitov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 23:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10623#comment-137935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They look solid to me, you can check the FB page

https://scontent-a-vie.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t31.0-8/1669692_779541265409276_629273479_o.jpg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They look solid to me, you can check the FB page</p>
<p><a href="https://scontent-a-vie.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t31.0-8/1669692_779541265409276_629273479_o.jpg" rel="nofollow">https://scontent-a-vie.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t31.0-8/1669692_779541265409276_629273479_o.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/another-wot-fake-model-kit/#comment-137909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10623#comment-137909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, they&#039;re already using it for the gun barrel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, they&#8217;re already using it for the gun barrel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juddgment .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/another-wot-fake-model-kit/#comment-137897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juddgment .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 20:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10623#comment-137897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How good quality are these models? I&#039;m happy to see the more WoT tanks as models since I love to build them. Though I have gotten used to 1:35 scale and I think the 1:72 are way too small.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How good quality are these models? I&#8217;m happy to see the more WoT tanks as models since I love to build them. Though I have gotten used to 1:35 scale and I think the 1:72 are way too small.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jarvisxv</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/another-wot-fake-model-kit/#comment-137878</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jarvisxv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 20:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10623#comment-137878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are models of giant robots and space battleships. 

As long as they don&#039;t market it as a historical tank, and enough people do not believe that it is so, I see no problem.

Frankly, I&#039;m happy a small model-making company and its workers can benefit from WG&#039;s liberal interpretation of history. I just hope WG doesn&#039;t sue them for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are models of giant robots and space battleships. </p>
<p>As long as they don&#8217;t market it as a historical tank, and enough people do not believe that it is so, I see no problem.</p>
<p>Frankly, I&#8217;m happy a small model-making company and its workers can benefit from WG&#8217;s liberal interpretation of history. I just hope WG doesn&#8217;t sue them for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jiri_Starrider</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/another-wot-fake-model-kit/#comment-137853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jiri_Starrider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10623#comment-137853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plenty of models out there that are made up, but appear historical (Panther 3/E-79). Don&#039;t have a problem with that. But I&#039;ll bet WG is getting it&#039;s panties in a bunch if they aren&#039;t licensed copies of their fake tank.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plenty of models out there that are made up, but appear historical (Panther 3/E-79). Don&#8217;t have a problem with that. But I&#8217;ll bet WG is getting it&#8217;s panties in a bunch if they aren&#8217;t licensed copies of their fake tank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominatus</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/another-wot-fake-model-kit/#comment-137825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dominatus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 18:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10623#comment-137825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t WG sue them for this?
Besides, the reason I really don&#039;t like the FV215b heavy is because the thing has the most hilariously poor design ever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t WG sue them for this?<br />
Besides, the reason I really don&#8217;t like the FV215b heavy is because the thing has the most hilariously poor design ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dimstam</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/another-wot-fake-model-kit/#comment-137818</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dimstam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 18:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10623#comment-137818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[with a chimney over the roof hahahahahahahahahahaha]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with a chimney over the roof hahahahahahahahahahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Chang</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/another-wot-fake-model-kit/#comment-137785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Chang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10623#comment-137785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because the armor behind the tracks of the FV215B heavy is only 51mm thick, same as the Conqueror. The 101mm side armor is only on the thin strip above the tracks, next to the engine deck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the armor behind the tracks of the FV215B heavy is only 51mm thick, same as the Conqueror. The 101mm side armor is only on the thin strip above the tracks, next to the engine deck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: killen5</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/another-wot-fake-model-kit/#comment-137783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[killen5]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10623#comment-137783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[284 parts on a tank which will be 16cm long when completed. That&#039;s roughly 3 parts per square cm across the base.  In comparison, the Bf-109 in 1/48th scale I have sitting on my desk has a part count per sq. cm of less than 0.5. That model is a beast and well worth the price tag.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>284 parts on a tank which will be 16cm long when completed. That&#8217;s roughly 3 parts per square cm across the base.  In comparison, the Bf-109 in 1/48th scale I have sitting on my desk has a part count per sq. cm of less than 0.5. That model is a beast and well worth the price tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
