<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview with V.Kislyi (topic: EU tree)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/interview-with-v-kislyi-topic-eu-tree/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/interview-with-v-kislyi-topic-eu-tree/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: European Tree part I &#8211; Introduction of the Concept &#124; For The Record</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/interview-with-v-kislyi-topic-eu-tree/#comment-138122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[European Tree part I &#8211; Introduction of the Concept &#124; For The Record]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 12:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10613#comment-138122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In his recent interview, Big Boss V.Kislyi noted that EU tree might not have such a high priority (obviously), because &#8211; and I quote (the interview can be watched here): [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In his recent interview, Big Boss V.Kislyi noted that EU tree might not have such a high priority (obviously), because &#8211; and I quote (the interview can be watched here): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radlizempicku</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/interview-with-v-kislyi-topic-eu-tree/#comment-137999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[radlizempicku]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10613#comment-137999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They should release EU tree instead chinese tree in EU and RU servers, developers in China can have their own chinese tree, also bigger maps like in WT will be better. I am tired of these russian bias copies and their decisions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should release EU tree instead chinese tree in EU and RU servers, developers in China can have their own chinese tree, also bigger maps like in WT will be better. I am tired of these russian bias copies and their decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolcott .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/interview-with-v-kislyi-topic-eu-tree/#comment-137956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolcott .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 03:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10613#comment-137956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chinese built tanks based on Soviet designs is variety indeed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chinese built tanks based on Soviet designs is variety indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadeah</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/interview-with-v-kislyi-topic-eu-tree/#comment-137912</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nadeah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10613#comment-137912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Italian tree overs an alternative tier 1 which could blood end the T1 Cunningham spam and would be different from the french tier one repetition. Italy was also an Axis, which would be nice in historical battles. 

Not including tier 1 the Hungarian Tree reaches tier 10 on it&#039;s own with medium tanks and TD proposals, they are mostly somewhat akin to Russian tanks with more gun depression but slightly worse armour and lower mobility aka. a middleman with less ridiculous turret armour than the americans but more russian sized vehicles ( less ridiculously big turrets ) 

Swedish tree is full of tanks that are actually TD&#039;s and has original designs which would be strange to have around in a supposed tank tree. As serb says: how terrible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Italian tree overs an alternative tier 1 which could blood end the T1 Cunningham spam and would be different from the french tier one repetition. Italy was also an Axis, which would be nice in historical battles. </p>
<p>Not including tier 1 the Hungarian Tree reaches tier 10 on it&#8217;s own with medium tanks and TD proposals, they are mostly somewhat akin to Russian tanks with more gun depression but slightly worse armour and lower mobility aka. a middleman with less ridiculous turret armour than the americans but more russian sized vehicles ( less ridiculously big turrets ) </p>
<p>Swedish tree is full of tanks that are actually TD&#8217;s and has original designs which would be strange to have around in a supposed tank tree. As serb says: how terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da_Zohan</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/interview-with-v-kislyi-topic-eu-tree/#comment-137884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Da_Zohan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 20:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10613#comment-137884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was I talking about the USA?  Nukes?
Israel does not have Nukes ;-)

But it does sound like you need a cattle prod shoved up your ass to get your lack of head straight.

I don&#039;t recall needing your permission to post anything here, so if you don&#039;t like what I post, feel free to ignore and move on.  
Unlike the USA, Israel has yet to lose a war, so our &quot;&quot;abomination&quot;&quot; of a country has more of a right to exist then you could ever imagine.

How many Native Americans did Americans butcher to create the USA?   
Women, children, Elderly?  Don&#039;t preach about abominations kiddo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was I talking about the USA?  Nukes?<br />
Israel does not have Nukes ;-)</p>
<p>But it does sound like you need a cattle prod shoved up your ass to get your lack of head straight.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t recall needing your permission to post anything here, so if you don&#8217;t like what I post, feel free to ignore and move on.<br />
Unlike the USA, Israel has yet to lose a war, so our &#8220;&#8221;abomination&#8221;&#8221; of a country has more of a right to exist then you could ever imagine.</p>
<p>How many Native Americans did Americans butcher to create the USA?<br />
Women, children, Elderly?  Don&#8217;t preach about abominations kiddo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: splatshot</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/interview-with-v-kislyi-topic-eu-tree/#comment-137794</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[splatshot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 18:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10613#comment-137794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I meant is the more famous/heavily used Czech tanks are there.

Fully agree that not all are covered.

I would like to see the Euro tanks, however if they were really that needed and good, they would be better known. I do not hear anyone on the NA server yelling for these.

I agree that the Japan tree was not needed, and I have never heard of any of these tanks and they bring nothing to the game.

I think they would be cool, and let the Europeans play their own countries which is fun, but how much will it bring outside of the EU, I do not see people coming to play the game just because it has Euro tanks, but I could see them playing due to E-sport (which I think are stupid).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I meant is the more famous/heavily used Czech tanks are there.</p>
<p>Fully agree that not all are covered.</p>
<p>I would like to see the Euro tanks, however if they were really that needed and good, they would be better known. I do not hear anyone on the NA server yelling for these.</p>
<p>I agree that the Japan tree was not needed, and I have never heard of any of these tanks and they bring nothing to the game.</p>
<p>I think they would be cool, and let the Europeans play their own countries which is fun, but how much will it bring outside of the EU, I do not see people coming to play the game just because it has Euro tanks, but I could see them playing due to E-sport (which I think are stupid).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Dao</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/interview-with-v-kislyi-topic-eu-tree/#comment-137781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Dao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10613#comment-137781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I personally want more tanks with silly names to shoot at, and the EU tree would do so nicely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally want more tanks with silly names to shoot at, and the EU tree would do so nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClassicFrog (EU)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/interview-with-v-kislyi-topic-eu-tree/#comment-137776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClassicFrog (EU)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10613#comment-137776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guess that&#039;s why they added Chinese tanks. They certainly do bring a lot of variety ... namely Russian tanks painted French green.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess that&#8217;s why they added Chinese tanks. They certainly do bring a lot of variety &#8230; namely Russian tanks painted French green.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sp15</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/interview-with-v-kislyi-topic-eu-tree/#comment-137775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sp15]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10613#comment-137775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;And are there really tanks in the EU tree from tier6+ that would contribute value to the game?&quot;

Yes there are plenty of interesting European tank projects that would fit tier 6-10. Here is a sample: Bkan 1A heavy 155mm autoloader artillery with 14 round mag, Strv 103 low profile autoloader medium without a turret, TVP T-50/51 moderetly armoured and mobile autoloader medium tank, T-17 autoloader light tank with good armor, OTO Centauro leopard 1 with autoloader. there are plenty more vehicles that i could mention but those should help answer your question.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And are there really tanks in the EU tree from tier6+ that would contribute value to the game?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes there are plenty of interesting European tank projects that would fit tier 6-10. Here is a sample: Bkan 1A heavy 155mm autoloader artillery with 14 round mag, Strv 103 low profile autoloader medium without a turret, TVP T-50/51 moderetly armoured and mobile autoloader medium tank, T-17 autoloader light tank with good armor, OTO Centauro leopard 1 with autoloader. there are plenty more vehicles that i could mention but those should help answer your question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sp15</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/interview-with-v-kislyi-topic-eu-tree/#comment-137770</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sp15]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10613#comment-137770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have obviously no idea about what a European tech tree can offer. It has the potential to be the largest tree in the game with atleast 4 medium lines, 3 TD lines, 2 SPG lines and possibly 2 heavy tank lines, all of which reach tier 10 and have no more than 2-4 foreign tanks. There is actually a huge variety in original european tank designs that are not in the game that include things such as the S-tank, M44 Tas, P40, T-50/51, Bkan 1A, Panzer 61 and hundreds more vehicles. 

I can understand if you dont want more tanks but your argument for not adding more tanks is not researched at all and should be dismissed since there are plenty of uniqe EU tanks that need representation in the game. and remember the game is called WORLD of tanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have obviously no idea about what a European tech tree can offer. It has the potential to be the largest tree in the game with atleast 4 medium lines, 3 TD lines, 2 SPG lines and possibly 2 heavy tank lines, all of which reach tier 10 and have no more than 2-4 foreign tanks. There is actually a huge variety in original european tank designs that are not in the game that include things such as the S-tank, M44 Tas, P40, T-50/51, Bkan 1A, Panzer 61 and hundreds more vehicles. </p>
<p>I can understand if you dont want more tanks but your argument for not adding more tanks is not researched at all and should be dismissed since there are plenty of uniqe EU tanks that need representation in the game. and remember the game is called WORLD of tanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
