<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Storm talks about 9.1 Balance Changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/15/storm-talks-about-9-1-balance-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/15/storm-talks-about-9-1-balance-changes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meat_Shield</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/15/storm-talks-about-9-1-balance-changes/#comment-142399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meat_Shield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2014 09:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10655#comment-142399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope they will reduce the Pz I C mm to tier 3-4... It cant do anything to tier 5 tanks (except for LT&#039;s and the T49)!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they will reduce the Pz I C mm to tier 3-4&#8230; It cant do anything to tier 5 tanks (except for LT&#8217;s and the T49)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derizia</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/15/storm-talks-about-9-1-balance-changes/#comment-139455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derizia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 18:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10655#comment-139455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no reason to nerf the Hellcat, especially given the pending TD camo nerf. (Admittedly, that camo nerf won&#039;t hurt the Hellcat as badly as other TDs given the common use of it as a front-line combat TD, rather than as pure fire support.)

The hellcat might be good, but it isn&#039;t unreasonably so. I have not yet driven a German tank of same or higher tier that was not able to handle a Hellcat with relative ease. It&#039;s armor is not that strong, only the frontal armor is decent with its slope. Any tanker worth his salt can find an opportunity to hit his side armor or a weak point on the front.

The Hetzer in no way needs a nerf. It&#039;s very well balanced and performs its role on a battlefield well, but not so well to warrant a downgrade. Yes, it is MEANT to bounce a lot of front shots. Meanwhile it has practically no armor on the sides and back, has a MASSIVE weak plate on the bottom of his front side for any smart tanker to shoot instead of his slope, and its firepower is not that wonderful. Only the derpgun is something that could be called &quot;good&quot; firepower, and it isn&#039;t wonderful in all situations.. A derpgun Hetzer is good at popping the smaller, weaker tanks that think of the Hetzer as an easy target. But take that Derpzer against a heavier target, especially if at range where it can keep its side armor protected, and it has a noticeable disadvantage against another TD or heavy/heavy-medium.

KV-1S is undeniably in need of a nerf.

DW2 is just as much (or more tbh) in need of a buff. God couldn&#039;t save that thing.

Pz III however has no need of a buff, it&#039;s an excellent tank. Too many just try to use it as a &quot;stand with angled armor and shoot at your target&quot; tank, when its advantage lies in mobility and fairly good firepower, not in it&#039;s ability to go toe-to-toe with anything.

SU-100 could definitely use a nerf.

AMX-40 could use a slight RoF boost imo.

T18 doesn&#039;t need modified. It already got a nerf, but it was beatable by a tanker who knew its weakpoints even before that nerf. Now it&#039;s easy to kill if you know where to shoot it, or if you flank it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no reason to nerf the Hellcat, especially given the pending TD camo nerf. (Admittedly, that camo nerf won&#8217;t hurt the Hellcat as badly as other TDs given the common use of it as a front-line combat TD, rather than as pure fire support.)</p>
<p>The hellcat might be good, but it isn&#8217;t unreasonably so. I have not yet driven a German tank of same or higher tier that was not able to handle a Hellcat with relative ease. It&#8217;s armor is not that strong, only the frontal armor is decent with its slope. Any tanker worth his salt can find an opportunity to hit his side armor or a weak point on the front.</p>
<p>The Hetzer in no way needs a nerf. It&#8217;s very well balanced and performs its role on a battlefield well, but not so well to warrant a downgrade. Yes, it is MEANT to bounce a lot of front shots. Meanwhile it has practically no armor on the sides and back, has a MASSIVE weak plate on the bottom of his front side for any smart tanker to shoot instead of his slope, and its firepower is not that wonderful. Only the derpgun is something that could be called &#8220;good&#8221; firepower, and it isn&#8217;t wonderful in all situations.. A derpgun Hetzer is good at popping the smaller, weaker tanks that think of the Hetzer as an easy target. But take that Derpzer against a heavier target, especially if at range where it can keep its side armor protected, and it has a noticeable disadvantage against another TD or heavy/heavy-medium.</p>
<p>KV-1S is undeniably in need of a nerf.</p>
<p>DW2 is just as much (or more tbh) in need of a buff. God couldn&#8217;t save that thing.</p>
<p>Pz III however has no need of a buff, it&#8217;s an excellent tank. Too many just try to use it as a &#8220;stand with angled armor and shoot at your target&#8221; tank, when its advantage lies in mobility and fairly good firepower, not in it&#8217;s ability to go toe-to-toe with anything.</p>
<p>SU-100 could definitely use a nerf.</p>
<p>AMX-40 could use a slight RoF boost imo.</p>
<p>T18 doesn&#8217;t need modified. It already got a nerf, but it was beatable by a tanker who knew its weakpoints even before that nerf. Now it&#8217;s easy to kill if you know where to shoot it, or if you flank it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quineloe</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/15/storm-talks-about-9-1-balance-changes/#comment-138976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quineloe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10655#comment-138976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So 9.1 won&#039;t bring increased drawing distance either?

Buncha tools.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So 9.1 won&#8217;t bring increased drawing distance either?</p>
<p>Buncha tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WorldsDawn</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/15/storm-talks-about-9-1-balance-changes/#comment-138960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WorldsDawn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10655#comment-138960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[statistically? you mean from the WR?

Best T9 med is the T-54 by far...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>statistically? you mean from the WR?</p>
<p>Best T9 med is the T-54 by far&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunshine</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/15/storm-talks-about-9-1-balance-changes/#comment-138761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sunshine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10655#comment-138761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[E-25 has low alpha, so it&#039;s reasonable for the vehicle to have lower camo penalty after shot.

Seriously, deal 390 damage, got lit up, hide for 10 seconds for another chance? Fine!
But 135 damage every 10 seconds? You must be kidding me!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E-25 has low alpha, so it&#8217;s reasonable for the vehicle to have lower camo penalty after shot.</p>
<p>Seriously, deal 390 damage, got lit up, hide for 10 seconds for another chance? Fine!<br />
But 135 damage every 10 seconds? You must be kidding me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocri</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/15/storm-talks-about-9-1-balance-changes/#comment-138738</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10655#comment-138738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If i understood corectly, technically, KV-1S won&#039;t be nerfed or buffed  - it will be split. 
Those bastards want to nerf my beloved Tiger, i&#039;m pretty sure it will get a ROF nerf, I&#039;m sad. :(
Poor Hellcat, loosing camo bonus will make him a piece of crap, tier 4and 5 fast scouts will make fun of him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i understood corectly, technically, KV-1S won&#8217;t be nerfed or buffed  &#8211; it will be split.<br />
Those bastards want to nerf my beloved Tiger, i&#8217;m pretty sure it will get a ROF nerf, I&#8217;m sad. :(<br />
Poor Hellcat, loosing camo bonus will make him a piece of crap, tier 4and 5 fast scouts will make fun of him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/15/storm-talks-about-9-1-balance-changes/#comment-138707</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10655#comment-138707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did just as good in my Tiger as in my IS 1/2 and IS-2.
Just as good.
Now the Tiger is better then them. Not balanced, just plain superior in game to IS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did just as good in my Tiger as in my IS 1/2 and IS-2.<br />
Just as good.<br />
Now the Tiger is better then them. Not balanced, just plain superior in game to IS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luscion</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/15/storm-talks-about-9-1-balance-changes/#comment-138693</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luscion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10655#comment-138693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Tortoise is slightly OP, but the armor change (nerf) in 9.0 will have some effect, if it’s not enough, it will be nerfed&quot;

you cant be serious right? who the hell comes up with these statements..the only good thing about the tortoise is the gun, the armor is complete garbage, yet its considered OP when its tier 10 counterpart can roll for over 1700 damage? i mean really WG.....if anything the tortoise needs an armor buff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tortoise is slightly OP, but the armor change (nerf) in 9.0 will have some effect, if it’s not enough, it will be nerfed&#8221;</p>
<p>you cant be serious right? who the hell comes up with these statements..the only good thing about the tortoise is the gun, the armor is complete garbage, yet its considered OP when its tier 10 counterpart can roll for over 1700 damage? i mean really WG&#8230;..if anything the tortoise needs an armor buff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sedziwoj</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/15/storm-talks-about-9-1-balance-changes/#comment-138630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sedziwoj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10655#comment-138630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If u need use gold, but not shot it all the time.
I have always gold ammo on tak, but only enough to take one tank (etc 35ap/5heat/2he)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If u need use gold, but not shot it all the time.<br />
I have always gold ammo on tak, but only enough to take one tank (etc 35ap/5heat/2he)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sedziwoj</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/15/storm-talks-about-9-1-balance-changes/#comment-138628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sedziwoj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10655#comment-138628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once it was tell, WR, rating is not most important. Good op rating is compare etc  player overall wr and on one tank. 
T57 Heavy is OP, but only in good hand, if u not play wisely u die instantly. same  WT auf. E 100.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once it was tell, WR, rating is not most important. Good op rating is compare etc  player overall wr and on one tank.<br />
T57 Heavy is OP, but only in good hand, if u not play wisely u die instantly. same  WT auf. E 100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
