<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Swedish Tanks – Part VII: Strv m/42</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/18/swedish-tanks-part-vii-strv-m42/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/18/swedish-tanks-part-vii-strv-m42/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: European Tree part IV &#8211; Sweden &#124; For The Record</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/18/swedish-tanks-part-vii-strv-m42/#comment-142601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[European Tree part IV &#8211; Sweden &#124; For The Record]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 11:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10755#comment-142601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Medium tanks are a mess. There are enough lowtier candidates, which are generally unremarkable, apart from some having very comfortable depression. Neither the armor nor the guns are outstanding, mobility is generally mediocre. We covered the lowtier candidates in the FTR series already, with tier 1 being the Strv m/21-29, Strv m/38 is the Landsverk L-60 variant, tier 5 is covered by the Strv m/42: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Medium tanks are a mess. There are enough lowtier candidates, which are generally unremarkable, apart from some having very comfortable depression. Neither the armor nor the guns are outstanding, mobility is generally mediocre. We covered the lowtier candidates in the FTR series already, with tier 1 being the Strv m/21-29, Strv m/38 is the Landsverk L-60 variant, tier 5 is covered by the Strv m/42: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meneldil</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/18/swedish-tanks-part-vii-strv-m42/#comment-139681</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meneldil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10755#comment-139681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s no surprise though. The &quot;modern tanks&quot; developement started before the war.

The BT successor that would become the T-34 was on the rail in 37. At the same date, the Germans were trying to put together a giant heavy tank that would become the Panther, and the French were working on the Char G1, which had all the characteristics of a 44-45 medium tank.

When a breakthrough is made, it&#039;s becomes easier for &quot;smaller&quot; or less rich nations to copy and reproduce it. This tank is cool, but in the end it&#039;s a subpar late PzIV.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s no surprise though. The &#8220;modern tanks&#8221; developement started before the war.</p>
<p>The BT successor that would become the T-34 was on the rail in 37. At the same date, the Germans were trying to put together a giant heavy tank that would become the Panther, and the French were working on the Char G1, which had all the characteristics of a 44-45 medium tank.</p>
<p>When a breakthrough is made, it&#8217;s becomes easier for &#8220;smaller&#8221; or less rich nations to copy and reproduce it. This tank is cool, but in the end it&#8217;s a subpar late PzIV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkeyfume</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/18/swedish-tanks-part-vii-strv-m42/#comment-139679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monkeyfume]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10755#comment-139679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like a T-50-2....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a T-50-2&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panzer_Fenris</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/18/swedish-tanks-part-vii-strv-m42/#comment-139651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Panzer_Fenris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10755#comment-139651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another great article, keep them coming!

It really is amazing how modern these tanks were when the process started. Of course, they fell behind as the war industries of the giant nations geared up, but it compares very favorably to pre/early-war designs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great article, keep them coming!</p>
<p>It really is amazing how modern these tanks were when the process started. Of course, they fell behind as the war industries of the giant nations geared up, but it compares very favorably to pre/early-war designs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sp15</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/18/swedish-tanks-part-vii-strv-m42/#comment-139644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sp15]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10755#comment-139644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes its a mk3 or 5 centurion. They were used by Sweden as strv 81 in the 1950s]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes its a mk3 or 5 centurion. They were used by Sweden as strv 81 in the 1950s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnusLover</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/18/swedish-tanks-part-vii-strv-m42/#comment-139642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AnusLover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10755#comment-139642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bridgelayer picture, Is that a Centurion I see in the background?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bridgelayer picture, Is that a Centurion I see in the background?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnusLover</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/18/swedish-tanks-part-vii-strv-m42/#comment-139639</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AnusLover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10755#comment-139639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[keep them coming.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keep them coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xCaptainObviousx</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/18/swedish-tanks-part-vii-strv-m42/#comment-139628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xCaptainObviousx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10755#comment-139628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wasn&#039;t there also a tank destroyer with a 10.5 cm gun and 15 degrees gun depression? That would be pretty sweet at t4 or 5]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t there also a tank destroyer with a 10.5 cm gun and 15 degrees gun depression? That would be pretty sweet at t4 or 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiger61378</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/18/swedish-tanks-part-vii-strv-m42/#comment-139622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tiger61378]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10755#comment-139622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice looking tanks....love the way they look, and they&#039;d probably find a permanent spot in my garage if they came in.  Esp. the Lago with that -15 gun depression...trolling ridgelines every day!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice looking tanks&#8230;.love the way they look, and they&#8217;d probably find a permanent spot in my garage if they came in.  Esp. the Lago with that -15 gun depression&#8230;trolling ridgelines every day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex sonny</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/18/swedish-tanks-part-vii-strv-m42/#comment-139621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alex sonny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10755#comment-139621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice! It seems interesting how the Swedish kept hanging onto the one-gun-two-machineguns front turret design. It looks very weird on the side with thwo MGs poking out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice! It seems interesting how the Swedish kept hanging onto the one-gun-two-machineguns front turret design. It looks very weird on the side with thwo MGs poking out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
