<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 20.4.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/20/20-4-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/20/20-4-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nefertum</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/20/20-4-2014/#comment-140698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nefertum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10854#comment-140698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well its simple. at the time your shell will land on to the side of the light or what ever there is a chance that in that exact time tank will move and the shell will land under different angle thus making it bounce...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well its simple. at the time your shell will land on to the side of the light or what ever there is a chance that in that exact time tank will move and the shell will land under different angle thus making it bounce&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/20/20-4-2014/#comment-140624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10854#comment-140624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Problem is the KV-2 got taken out by a 88 FlaK piece, the punytanks just distracted the Soviet monster while the gun was being moved into position. Not exactly a recipe for decent tank-to-tank action if you ask me...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problem is the KV-2 got taken out by a 88 FlaK piece, the punytanks just distracted the Soviet monster while the gun was being moved into position. Not exactly a recipe for decent tank-to-tank action if you ask me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/20/20-4-2014/#comment-140605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10854#comment-140605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which may well be true for all I know - I&#039;m pretty sure the majority of players are dumber than things growing on damp old bread - but does little to dispel the point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which may well be true for all I know &#8211; I&#8217;m pretty sure the majority of players are dumber than things growing on damp old bread &#8211; but does little to dispel the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/20/20-4-2014/#comment-140604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10854#comment-140604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two BL-9s as opposed to one M62-T2... at Tier Nine? Might be nasty for lower-tier stuff, but likely a tad lacking against peers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two BL-9s as opposed to one M62-T2&#8230; at Tier Nine? Might be nasty for lower-tier stuff, but likely a tad lacking against peers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/20/20-4-2014/#comment-140602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10854#comment-140602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Allied vs. Nips hot tank-on-tank action also has the minor problem of being kinda hilariously one-sided, given the outdated and undergunned shit the latter mostly fielded. Hell - M2 Lights tore those rustbuckets a new one in Philippines, &#039;41...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Allied vs. Nips hot tank-on-tank action also has the minor problem of being kinda hilariously one-sided, given the outdated and undergunned shit the latter mostly fielded. Hell &#8211; M2 Lights tore those rustbuckets a new one in Philippines, &#8217;41&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/20/20-4-2014/#comment-140599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10854#comment-140599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[M3Lee could probably find some use for that turret 37 mm given the tiers it&#039;s in.

Not quite the same thing, but the coax weapon on the AMX 50 120/ 50B is actually a 20 mm autocannon - potential utility being roughly the same as with the Mouse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M3Lee could probably find some use for that turret 37 mm given the tiers it&#8217;s in.</p>
<p>Not quite the same thing, but the coax weapon on the AMX 50 120/ 50B is actually a 20 mm autocannon &#8211; potential utility being roughly the same as with the Mouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radlizempicku</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/20/20-4-2014/#comment-140557</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[radlizempicku]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 12:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10854#comment-140557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[+1 Nice perks guys. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 Nice perks guys. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cendrake</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/20/20-4-2014/#comment-140549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cendrake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 11:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10854#comment-140549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And furthermore I&#039;m suspicious about one thing: I&#039;m sure that you will encounter even more noobs in these game modes. So you&#039;re not even more likely to end up in tomato teams, they will also even suck harder there, because they&#039;re harder to play.

The reason for me to suspect this is, that definitely newbs and bad players that don&#039;t deal with the game at all, are more often the ones that aren&#039;t even aware of the fact that they can turn these modes off.

So all in all imo these game modes are only the cause for more frustration.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And furthermore I&#8217;m suspicious about one thing: I&#8217;m sure that you will encounter even more noobs in these game modes. So you&#8217;re not even more likely to end up in tomato teams, they will also even suck harder there, because they&#8217;re harder to play.</p>
<p>The reason for me to suspect this is, that definitely newbs and bad players that don&#8217;t deal with the game at all, are more often the ones that aren&#8217;t even aware of the fact that they can turn these modes off.</p>
<p>So all in all imo these game modes are only the cause for more frustration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cendrake</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/20/20-4-2014/#comment-140547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cendrake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 11:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10854#comment-140547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally, I turned them both off after just a few days. For several reasons. Mainly, because assault is unfair on most maps. Both modes require different tactics and most players in WoT already have problems with standard battles. Furthermore: there are 3 different game modes then: Standard, Assault and Encounter. You have absolutely no choice but either to play them or not. You don&#039;t get to select: Now I want to play this mode or that mode. So oftentimes it happens, that you have a Standard battle, followed by two Encounter battles, then an Assault battle, another Encounter etc. So it turns out that suddenly maybe only 1/5 or 1/3 battles are Standard battles anymore. I don&#039;t want that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I turned them both off after just a few days. For several reasons. Mainly, because assault is unfair on most maps. Both modes require different tactics and most players in WoT already have problems with standard battles. Furthermore: there are 3 different game modes then: Standard, Assault and Encounter. You have absolutely no choice but either to play them or not. You don&#8217;t get to select: Now I want to play this mode or that mode. So oftentimes it happens, that you have a Standard battle, followed by two Encounter battles, then an Assault battle, another Encounter etc. So it turns out that suddenly maybe only 1/5 or 1/3 battles are Standard battles anymore. I don&#8217;t want that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex sonny</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/20/20-4-2014/#comment-140482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alex sonny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10854#comment-140482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I play historical battles, I would like to see this battle in them and I just disproved your entire argument. Don&#039;t generalise based on what you do. You are not &quot;everyone&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I play historical battles, I would like to see this battle in them and I just disproved your entire argument. Don&#8217;t generalise based on what you do. You are not &#8220;everyone&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
