Comments on: 26.4.2014

By: Dark

Dark — Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:24:28 +0000

Oh look you, replied, good i needed some laughs. You seem to be running out of arguments when you start calling me a liar and cognitively challenged. Sorry boy i’ve been playing CS, team fortress and day of defeat long before steam even came to be and you have a bit less time to aim there :P

Here’s wot’s min requirements, straight from system requirement labs:
CPU Speed: 2.2 GHz
RAM: 1.5 GB for Windows 2000/XP, 2 GB for Windows Vista / 7
OS: Windows 2000/XP/Vista/7
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT with 256 MB of RAM / ATI Radeon X800 with 256 MB RAM
Sound Card: Yes

Cosmic, aren’t they: XD So i suggest you save up some cash and remove that weak spot you call your gaming pc. FFS, this config is like, sooo 2005…

Again, not believing you can enjoy the game like that. Furthermore, implying you can predict a movement of a tank driven by a completely random person, nice joke. hear me laughing? NO, it’s pure masochism and you won’t convince me otherwise.

So why the feek you even brought a turn based game to a discussion about an arcade one?!

Now if you excuse me, my next paycheck is on the way and i’m gonna be buying new psu as a start of upgrading my pc.
Don’t bother replying .

P.S. it’s you own dam fault for whining in the first place earlier on.

By: TheTuberKnownAsMe .

TheTuberKnownAsMe . — Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:47:46 +0000

I like your memory leak theory. Please tell me why dont I suffer from memory leaks when I’m playing WoT for hours at a time? Its not like my 8GB DDR and 2GB videocard memory are actually remarkable these days.

More likely your system gives you the “out of memory” error because either WoT files arent optimized and require unproportinal memory usage, which is pretty likely considering WG’s background. But in the odd chance that WG actually got that right, I might see a memory upgrade in your near future.

Keep in mind that as WoT develops over the years, the developers will make an effort to keep the players with their current minimum settings in the game. But even then, its logical to assume system requirement will tend to get more demanding to the point where you actually need some proper gear.

By: bergauk

bergauk — Mon, 28 Apr 2014 05:02:04 +0000

How long are they going to blatantly deny there is a memory leak in their software? You simply cannot play with map textures below medium settings because you won’t fucking know if there’s a rock in front of you or if it’s clear open ground. The problem is not my settings. It’s their fucking memory leak that they keep denying exists.

By: p b

p b — Sun, 27 Apr 2014 22:56:45 +0000

Confirmed. I lost 15/25 fps with xfire

By: Skarakien

Skarakien — Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:54:18 +0000

So many things wrong in this response that i can’t even think where should i start it.

“Wot doesn’t have cosmic min requirements” Yet you suggest it it has.
“i can’t aim properly due to slight slide-show” This tells something about you and the working of your brain.
“So don’t even try to tell me you can aim at weak spots” you get used to the slideshow and in fact after 1-2 months you start to develop a precognition about tank movements.
“What you described is not enjoyment, but determination to play the game against all odds” <— This is what people call "difficulty of the game". This is what makes it "fun".
"comparing WOT to chess is kinda pointless- see difference of game dynamics(turn based vs arcade)"… i said "I don’t need 200 FPS to enjoy playing chess." PLEASE TRY TO READ!! … but if you want to i can compare them :D
"If you want all games to run great, get a console" This statement was true before 2006.

By: Dark

Dark — Sun, 27 Apr 2014 20:09:07 +0000

Wot doesn’t have cosmic min requirements, actually it’s quite below average compared to most games now.
About that “control”, i can’t aim properly due to slight slide-show at 20fps, so at 8fps i would simply “screw it, it’s not worth the frustration”. So don’t even try to tell me you can aim at weak spots, cause that’s bullcrap. What you described is not enjoyment, but determination to play the game against all odds. Also comparing WOT to chess is kinda pointless- see difference of game dynamics(turn based vs arcade)
To enjoy the game i want it to run smooth and look good enough that i won’t want to uninstal it after 15 min first.
System requirements are there for a reason. If you want all games to run great, get a console, there’s no other way besides buying new hardware.

By: Skarakien

Skarakien — Sun, 27 Apr 2014 13:49:13 +0000

Please describe the “enjoy playing with a game” to me because i like a game if i can understand it’s mechanics and have control over it’s actions no matter how crappy it looks like or how “slideshowy’ it looks like. I don’t need 200 FPS to enjoy playing chess.

And about “WG doesn’t have to make sure their game is O.K. with your shitty rig” is like saying “They can make a game that only works on the latest NASA computers. Deal with it.” thus if your 1 year old superüberPC can’t handle it than buy a new superüberPC. Would you play a game like that? Would MOST of the people play it? I don’t think so.

By: ilmor

ilmor — Sun, 27 Apr 2014 09:57:41 +0000

After 9.0.1, I’ve gone from having all the problems we’ve heard about to having none. Played 42 games with no issues and graphics on max settings. The only other thing I did was install Razer Game Booster.

By: Haren

Haren — Sun, 27 Apr 2014 09:28:37 +0000

Oh it doesn’t look ugly! It looks vintage^^

By: Глухозъбест Бахузавър

Глухозъбест Бахузавър — Sun, 27 Apr 2014 08:21:16 +0000

Can you describe the way how to disable flash interface?