<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wallpaper for May</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/01/wallpaper-for-may/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/01/wallpaper-for-may/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Perfect</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/01/wallpaper-for-may/#comment-144780</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Perfect]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 23:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11335#comment-144780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much better without all the branding on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much better without all the branding on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jiri_Starrider</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/01/wallpaper-for-may/#comment-144703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jiri_Starrider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 16:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11335#comment-144703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happened to the copyright post?

Was looking at the 2 pictures. IMO it&#039;s not filched. The location the picture was taken from is exact, but the shadows are different. I doubt they would bother altering the shadows if it was indeed &quot;borrowed&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to the copyright post?</p>
<p>Was looking at the 2 pictures. IMO it&#8217;s not filched. The location the picture was taken from is exact, but the shadows are different. I doubt they would bother altering the shadows if it was indeed &#8220;borrowed&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snrub</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/01/wallpaper-for-may/#comment-144679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[snrub]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 16:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11335#comment-144679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lol, called it.
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/02/may-wg-wallpaper-another-copyright-screwup/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, called it.<br />
<a href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/02/may-wg-wallpaper-another-copyright-screwup/" rel="nofollow">http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/02/may-wg-wallpaper-another-copyright-screwup/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/01/wallpaper-for-may/#comment-144614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 13:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11335#comment-144614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Retards dont get solo 58% win ratio and 2k+ WN8. My gameplay style is simple : W + LMB. The fact I am quite damned good at FPS saves my reatrded tactic as I simply overwhelm people.

I get it, you are living in a fairy tail. If Tiger 2 has bad armor, then IS-3 has 0 armor.
If Germans are bad, then why is E-100, E-50M, Leopard 1 and hell even JPZ E-100 and Maus all used in CW?
I myself have driven and will drive a Tiger 2 in the mini campaign. Lets see whether I will get a damned T23 (admitedly hard, bad month for me)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retards dont get solo 58% win ratio and 2k+ WN8. My gameplay style is simple : W + LMB. The fact I am quite damned good at FPS saves my reatrded tactic as I simply overwhelm people.</p>
<p>I get it, you are living in a fairy tail. If Tiger 2 has bad armor, then IS-3 has 0 armor.<br />
If Germans are bad, then why is E-100, E-50M, Leopard 1 and hell even JPZ E-100 and Maus all used in CW?<br />
I myself have driven and will drive a Tiger 2 in the mini campaign. Lets see whether I will get a damned T23 (admitedly hard, bad month for me)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sobo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/01/wallpaper-for-may/#comment-144580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sobo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 12:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11335#comment-144580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Youre saying one nonsense after the other...
a) There is NO MAP which would favor the Tiger. If there was, the pros would have picked it.
b) Proffesionals dont pick specialists? How about AMX 50 100? AMX 13 90? T1? Speaking of which, what is KTs specialty? Having crap armor? Or perhaps no speed??
c) Any tank driven by a good player can own. I have seen people doing 12+ kills with an M3 Lee. That does not mean the tank is any good though.
d) Saying KT is better than IS-3 just because YOU (a retard like you said) have better winrate in it takes some nerve. Seems legit... If anything, it proves KT is easier to play for retarded players, but thats about it.
e) I never said anything about Russian bias. I was reffering to anti-German bias the whole time. Your statement about picking USA/French vehicles for CWs just proves my point. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youre saying one nonsense after the other&#8230;<br />
a) There is NO MAP which would favor the Tiger. If there was, the pros would have picked it.<br />
b) Proffesionals dont pick specialists? How about AMX 50 100? AMX 13 90? T1? Speaking of which, what is KTs specialty? Having crap armor? Or perhaps no speed??<br />
c) Any tank driven by a good player can own. I have seen people doing 12+ kills with an M3 Lee. That does not mean the tank is any good though.<br />
d) Saying KT is better than IS-3 just because YOU (a retard like you said) have better winrate in it takes some nerve. Seems legit&#8230; If anything, it proves KT is easier to play for retarded players, but thats about it.<br />
e) I never said anything about Russian bias. I was reffering to anti-German bias the whole time. Your statement about picking USA/French vehicles for CWs just proves my point. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armatage</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/01/wallpaper-for-may/#comment-144486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[armatage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 10:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11335#comment-144486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or, OR, it means that basically you need maus to kill t-34, and since we all know maus never really fought its still &quot;russian undefeated&quot;. Just for the sake of argument.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, OR, it means that basically you need maus to kill t-34, and since we all know maus never really fought its still &#8220;russian undefeated&#8221;. Just for the sake of argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lareone</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/01/wallpaper-for-may/#comment-144470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lareone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 09:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11335#comment-144470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The biggest number of WoT is in Russia where....
CCCP = Good guy
German = Bad guy

Bias? probably, annoying when thinks about it? definitely.
just look over it, It&#039;s Russian game after all

And yes another Classic WG art, I&#039;ll passed]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest number of WoT is in Russia where&#8230;.<br />
CCCP = Good guy<br />
German = Bad guy</p>
<p>Bias? probably, annoying when thinks about it? definitely.<br />
just look over it, It&#8217;s Russian game after all</p>
<p>And yes another Classic WG art, I&#8217;ll passed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/01/wallpaper-for-may/#comment-144400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 06:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11335#comment-144400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SOme people have 4 skill IS-3s... of coarse they will use them.
We got our M60s and 7201s with usage of Tiger 2s on maps we knew beforehand. When a person that is GOOD with Tiger 2, has a GOOD crew and is on a map which FAVORS the Tiger 2, it can and will pwn.

And no, TIger 2 is IMO better then IS-3.
My  win ratio in IS-3 : 51. My win ratio in Tiger 2: 60-61. And I play like a retard, W + LMB = WIN.
Tiger 2 is a freacking MONSTER tank...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SOme people have 4 skill IS-3s&#8230; of coarse they will use them.<br />
We got our M60s and 7201s with usage of Tiger 2s on maps we knew beforehand. When a person that is GOOD with Tiger 2, has a GOOD crew and is on a map which FAVORS the Tiger 2, it can and will pwn.</p>
<p>And no, TIger 2 is IMO better then IS-3.<br />
My  win ratio in IS-3 : 51. My win ratio in Tiger 2: 60-61. And I play like a retard, W + LMB = WIN.<br />
Tiger 2 is a freacking MONSTER tank&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/01/wallpaper-for-may/#comment-144399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 05:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11335#comment-144399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am NOT Russian...
Dear God... such... idiocracy...
Learn your countries and languages first.

Reason they are not picked is simple noob:
- They want decent at everything awesome at nothing vehicles. That is the tactics they used. The IS-3 is like that for an example.
- Look at starcraft how balance is done... Terrans may be easiest to play, but that does not mean they are OP. Simply the way the game is engineered.
-Face it, specialist vehicles have a place in WoT, but will almost never be used as much as non-specialist vehicles. Example : US heavy tanks and E-100. E5 is almost 100% a workhorse tank. E-100 is the BREAK THEIR faces tank.
- You kinda defeated the SOVIET bias yourself. From what I see in CW, usually it is French/USA vehicles that are the most used/put in the most important roles.
Wont stop me from play my Soviet/German/Chinese tank though :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am NOT Russian&#8230;<br />
Dear God&#8230; such&#8230; idiocracy&#8230;<br />
Learn your countries and languages first.</p>
<p>Reason they are not picked is simple noob:<br />
- They want decent at everything awesome at nothing vehicles. That is the tactics they used. The IS-3 is like that for an example.<br />
- Look at starcraft how balance is done&#8230; Terrans may be easiest to play, but that does not mean they are OP. Simply the way the game is engineered.<br />
-Face it, specialist vehicles have a place in WoT, but will almost never be used as much as non-specialist vehicles. Example : US heavy tanks and E-100. E5 is almost 100% a workhorse tank. E-100 is the BREAK THEIR faces tank.<br />
- You kinda defeated the SOVIET bias yourself. From what I see in CW, usually it is French/USA vehicles that are the most used/put in the most important roles.<br />
Wont stop me from play my Soviet/German/Chinese tank though :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zweilicht</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/01/wallpaper-for-may/#comment-144394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zweilicht]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 04:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11335#comment-144394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[forgot to add, this is definately one of the pretiest posters they have done, its going on my desktop when I get home :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>forgot to add, this is definately one of the pretiest posters they have done, its going on my desktop when I get home :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
