<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8.5.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/08/8-5-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/08/8-5-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wims80</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/08/8-5-2014/#comment-147721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wims80]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2014 22:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11649#comment-147721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Havok is a physics library]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Havok is a physics library</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nomae The Jester</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/08/8-5-2014/#comment-147595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nomae The Jester]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2014 15:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11649#comment-147595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somehow its armor doesn&#039;t matter, but it manages to bounce almost twice as many shots as the Tiger? According to vbaddict 28.92% of shots bounce off of the Tiger P, while 16.64 bounce off the Tiger.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow its armor doesn&#8217;t matter, but it manages to bounce almost twice as many shots as the Tiger? According to vbaddict 28.92% of shots bounce off of the Tiger P, while 16.64 bounce off the Tiger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radium_Angel</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/08/8-5-2014/#comment-147520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Radium_Angel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2014 12:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11649#comment-147520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citation please? I can&#039;t find any info that supports your assertion]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citation please? I can&#8217;t find any info that supports your assertion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: known soldier</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/08/8-5-2014/#comment-147144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[known soldier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 16:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11649#comment-147144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed, completely ridiculous.  Looks like WG is going to nerf the T-150 into the ground too when the KV1S gets split/nerfed soon™.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, completely ridiculous.  Looks like WG is going to nerf the T-150 into the ground too when the KV1S gets split/nerfed soon™.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dickie2Bass</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/08/8-5-2014/#comment-147105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dickie2Bass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 14:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11649#comment-147105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[for tier 4 light tanks – minimal battletier 4, maximum battletier 7
for tier 5 light tanks – minimal battletier 6, maximum battletier 8
for tier 6 light tanks – minimal battletier 7, maximum battletier 9
for tier 7 light tanks – minimal battletier 8, maximum battletier 10

I don&#039;t see it as a buff
They never get to see their own tier
They got crap MM last time around &amp; WG LOST players so this is their compromise?

If you caught your old lady giving head to your buddy &amp; not to you I suppose you&#039;d be ok with that.

Only reason T18 &amp; Hellcat are OP is because everything surrounding them has already been castrated.

MM in WoT is no different than if you put the New York Yankees against a T-Ball team of 6 year olds. Both teams wear hats, both teams wear uniforms, both teams wear spikes, both teams use a ball and a bat so that makes then evenly matched. No wait, the 6 year olds are using a &quot;T&quot; to put their ball on. Let&#039;s nerf the 6 year olds. The 6 year olds can&#039; run the bases, they have to hop on one foot.  Now it&#039;s fair AND balanced the Wargaming way.  ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for tier 4 light tanks – minimal battletier 4, maximum battletier 7<br />
for tier 5 light tanks – minimal battletier 6, maximum battletier 8<br />
for tier 6 light tanks – minimal battletier 7, maximum battletier 9<br />
for tier 7 light tanks – minimal battletier 8, maximum battletier 10</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see it as a buff<br />
They never get to see their own tier<br />
They got crap MM last time around &amp; WG LOST players so this is their compromise?</p>
<p>If you caught your old lady giving head to your buddy &amp; not to you I suppose you&#8217;d be ok with that.</p>
<p>Only reason T18 &amp; Hellcat are OP is because everything surrounding them has already been castrated.</p>
<p>MM in WoT is no different than if you put the New York Yankees against a T-Ball team of 6 year olds. Both teams wear hats, both teams wear uniforms, both teams wear spikes, both teams use a ball and a bat so that makes then evenly matched. No wait, the 6 year olds are using a &#8220;T&#8221; to put their ball on. Let&#8217;s nerf the 6 year olds. The 6 year olds can&#8217; run the bases, they have to hop on one foot.  Now it&#8217;s fair AND balanced the Wargaming way.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syfer Polski</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/08/8-5-2014/#comment-147084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Syfer Polski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 13:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11649#comment-147084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tiger P has more weakspots than stong spots. 80 mm corners, 80? mm lower plate, 70? mm hatch which makes you unable to go hulldown, some of the hatches are paper too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tiger P has more weakspots than stong spots. 80 mm corners, 80? mm lower plate, 70? mm hatch which makes you unable to go hulldown, some of the hatches are paper too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/08/8-5-2014/#comment-147063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 13:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11649#comment-147063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russians consider Tiger 1 to be overpowered. Most of that feedback on balance comes from russians. 

You know - these are the guys from RU server, the one famous from having WTF-100 win rate at 50% making it one of the most balanced tanks in the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russians consider Tiger 1 to be overpowered. Most of that feedback on balance comes from russians. </p>
<p>You know &#8211; these are the guys from RU server, the one famous from having WTF-100 win rate at 50% making it one of the most balanced tanks in the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/08/8-5-2014/#comment-147061</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 13:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11649#comment-147061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WT doesn&#039;t have a proper collision physics implemented yet. Basically - all of the tanks weight the same, so the one with higher speed got more energy to turn you over. It&#039;s a closed beta. Wait till they implement it.
And besides - avoid ramming. It&#039;s not WoT. Ramming doesn&#039;t do shit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WT doesn&#8217;t have a proper collision physics implemented yet. Basically &#8211; all of the tanks weight the same, so the one with higher speed got more energy to turn you over. It&#8217;s a closed beta. Wait till they implement it.<br />
And besides &#8211; avoid ramming. It&#8217;s not WoT. Ramming doesn&#8217;t do shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/08/8-5-2014/#comment-147060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 13:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11649#comment-147060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[+1]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/08/8-5-2014/#comment-147058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 13:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11649#comment-147058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yea, like a maps magnitude larger, tanks with far more elaborate texturing any polycount, by far more advanced lighting system and physics, higher res plants and other assets, etc. etc..... all of this are &quot;less things to render and just a facy shaders&quot;. LOL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, like a maps magnitude larger, tanks with far more elaborate texturing any polycount, by far more advanced lighting system and physics, higher res plants and other assets, etc. etc&#8230;.. all of this are &#8220;less things to render and just a facy shaders&#8221;. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
