<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soviet Tier 8 Light Tank Confirmed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/14/soviet-tier-8-light-tank-confirmed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/14/soviet-tier-8-light-tank-confirmed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Storm Confirms: Soviet LT8 will be the LTTB &#124; For The Record</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/14/soviet-tier-8-light-tank-confirmed/#comment-149932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Storm Confirms: Soviet LT8 will be the LTTB &#124; For The Record]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 06:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11850#comment-149932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I posted about Storm stating that the Soviets will get their LT8 along with the German LT8 (RU251). Well, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I posted about Storm stating that the Soviets will get their LT8 along with the German LT8 (RU251). Well, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/14/soviet-tier-8-light-tank-confirmed/#comment-149861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 22:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11850#comment-149861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see any reason why the PT-76 can&#039;t be a tier 8 light tank for the Russians.  It being an amphibious tank is a cop-out, as the BT-SV is in the game (granted, it&#039;s a gift tank), but without the amphibious capability that it had irl.  There should be no trouble implementing the PT-76 in that capacity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any reason why the PT-76 can&#8217;t be a tier 8 light tank for the Russians.  It being an amphibious tank is a cop-out, as the BT-SV is in the game (granted, it&#8217;s a gift tank), but without the amphibious capability that it had irl.  There should be no trouble implementing the PT-76 in that capacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/14/soviet-tier-8-light-tank-confirmed/#comment-149860</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 22:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11850#comment-149860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*cough*BT-SV*cough*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*cough*BT-SV*cough*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/14/soviet-tier-8-light-tank-confirmed/#comment-149829</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 20:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11850#comment-149829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or just don&#039;t include the amphibious part and make it a regular tank like the BT-SV (amphibious irl, not amphibious in the game).

Of course, the main appeal about the PT-76 is the gun options it gets, which include the following:

76 mm D-56T - A typical 76 mm rifled gun.  With this equipped, the tank would play similarly to the Chaffee, with low alpha but good dpm and adequate penetration.

57 mm AZP S-60 - A 57 mm autocannon used on the PT-76E.  While damage output would be mediocre, its high penetration and accuracy could be useful for harassing enemy tanks from a distance, giving it a unique playstyle compared to the WZ-132 and the AMX 13 90.

Another possible gun option is the 85 mm gun of the PT-85, a variant of the tank used by North Korea.  Note that this MIGHT be a smoothbore gun, as it can launch ATGMs irl, so this may not be suitable.

Either way, the appeal to the PT-76 would be the varied playstyles you can have with it depending on the gun you choose, which gives it something for everybody.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or just don&#8217;t include the amphibious part and make it a regular tank like the BT-SV (amphibious irl, not amphibious in the game).</p>
<p>Of course, the main appeal about the PT-76 is the gun options it gets, which include the following:</p>
<p>76 mm D-56T &#8211; A typical 76 mm rifled gun.  With this equipped, the tank would play similarly to the Chaffee, with low alpha but good dpm and adequate penetration.</p>
<p>57 mm AZP S-60 &#8211; A 57 mm autocannon used on the PT-76E.  While damage output would be mediocre, its high penetration and accuracy could be useful for harassing enemy tanks from a distance, giving it a unique playstyle compared to the WZ-132 and the AMX 13 90.</p>
<p>Another possible gun option is the 85 mm gun of the PT-85, a variant of the tank used by North Korea.  Note that this MIGHT be a smoothbore gun, as it can launch ATGMs irl, so this may not be suitable.</p>
<p>Either way, the appeal to the PT-76 would be the varied playstyles you can have with it depending on the gun you choose, which gives it something for everybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimo Gugushev</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/14/soviet-tier-8-light-tank-confirmed/#comment-149683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dimo Gugushev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 16:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11850#comment-149683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nations you mentioned are not popular and therefore not profitable...French heavies were planned long time ago and they postponed them for 2015+. 

Why you ask, well it&#039;s simple - the more popular is a certain line, the more people play it and more people spend free exp on it. Free exp that was previously converted for gold. It&#039;s the same with japanese and chinese trees as well.  

I would bet much more players converted exp to get WT auf E100 and FV215b 183 on day 1 of their introduction than on STB-1 or 121.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nations you mentioned are not popular and therefore not profitable&#8230;French heavies were planned long time ago and they postponed them for 2015+. </p>
<p>Why you ask, well it&#8217;s simple &#8211; the more popular is a certain line, the more people play it and more people spend free exp on it. Free exp that was previously converted for gold. It&#8217;s the same with japanese and chinese trees as well.  </p>
<p>I would bet much more players converted exp to get WT auf E100 and FV215b 183 on day 1 of their introduction than on STB-1 or 121.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nixxxie</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/14/soviet-tier-8-light-tank-confirmed/#comment-149671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nixxxie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 16:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11850#comment-149671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And engine restrictions in reality. They had to work pretty hard to add the kind of &quot;physics&quot; we have and it is still a patchwork. The same reason tanks don&#039;t flip over ;) .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And engine restrictions in reality. They had to work pretty hard to add the kind of &#8220;physics&#8221; we have and it is still a patchwork. The same reason tanks don&#8217;t flip over ;) .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skarakien</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/14/soviet-tier-8-light-tank-confirmed/#comment-149663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skarakien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 16:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11850#comment-149663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanna see T-50-2 again. :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanna see T-50-2 again. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meneldil</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/14/soviet-tier-8-light-tank-confirmed/#comment-149659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meneldil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 16:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11850#comment-149659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heh.

On the one hand, I don&#039;t really get all the people yelling &quot;historical accuracy&quot;, &quot;made up tanks&quot; and what not. I&#039;d say more than half the tanks we drive already never made it past the drawing board or the prototype stage. Some are just plain fake based on some guy&#039;s uncle&#039;s ideas. So what? In the end, as long as they bring more variety and somehow fit into the game, I don&#039;t think this hurt.

But on the other hand, I&#039;d like to know why WG keeps looking for obscure protos and drawing board tanks, while there are so many real, actually produced tanks, to add to the game. There&#039;s a french tree that could get two or three times bigger than it is now, a British tree that&#039;s pretty much empty too, and about a hundred european tanks that could fill up a multinational tree. Work on those before digging up unknown projects.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh.</p>
<p>On the one hand, I don&#8217;t really get all the people yelling &#8220;historical accuracy&#8221;, &#8220;made up tanks&#8221; and what not. I&#8217;d say more than half the tanks we drive already never made it past the drawing board or the prototype stage. Some are just plain fake based on some guy&#8217;s uncle&#8217;s ideas. So what? In the end, as long as they bring more variety and somehow fit into the game, I don&#8217;t think this hurt.</p>
<p>But on the other hand, I&#8217;d like to know why WG keeps looking for obscure protos and drawing board tanks, while there are so many real, actually produced tanks, to add to the game. There&#8217;s a french tree that could get two or three times bigger than it is now, a British tree that&#8217;s pretty much empty too, and about a hundred european tanks that could fill up a multinational tree. Work on those before digging up unknown projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xelos</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/14/soviet-tier-8-light-tank-confirmed/#comment-149628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xelos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 16:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11850#comment-149628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True dat]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True dat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conrad</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/14/soviet-tier-8-light-tank-confirmed/#comment-149536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conrad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 14:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11850#comment-149536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d rather see them make the T-44-85 into a light tank then them make something up again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather see them make the T-44-85 into a light tank then them make something up again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
