Comments on: Storm: 9.1 – Tank Changes Cancelled

By: SuperOlsson

SuperOlsson — Thu, 15 May 2014 15:20:24 +0000

Ahem, i said annoying, not incredibly op… Fucking retard…

Also my stats for last 1000 battles are better than yours xD

By: Drakko

Drakko — Thu, 15 May 2014 09:55:10 +0000

They do lose camo rating while firing, just not as much as other tanks. The difference is going to be once you have actually fired…you kinda need to gtfo fast, you can’t just sit there fapping a short one while your gun reloads(unless you really wanna see your garage again fast).

As for the low tiers…they might see a difference, keep in mind that, even though low tier tanks have crappier view ranges, and theoretically won’t see that far, the low tier TDs also fire much faster so all in all the two things may cancel one another out(also, actually having a muzzle break affects the camo a bit more than the caliber itself)

By: Drakko

Drakko — Thu, 15 May 2014 09:46:04 +0000

Like it needed more crap. That thing is awful.

By: Drakko

Drakko — Thu, 15 May 2014 09:45:30 +0000

Oh it could recoil – once.

By: Drakko

Drakko — Thu, 15 May 2014 09:41:27 +0000

“who the hell invented it?”

The americans…but it was an artillery piece not a tank destroyer per se.

Then again, for Tier 2, I use my Tetrarch. The Tetrarch doesn’t give 1 single solitary fuck about the T18′s armor.

By the way, do you know that thing is blind as an autistic bat?

Not saying it shouldn’t be nerfed, just saying that most players don’t really give a crap about it unless they’re pedobears, in which case, they kinda deserve the beatdown.

By: Drakko

Drakko — Thu, 15 May 2014 09:38:36 +0000

They’re basing stuff on the idea that currently TDs can shoot you with impunity without giving themselves away, effectively enforcing camping gameplay.

With the new camo nerf, they won’t do that anymore and will be forced to back down and/or relocate, otherwise be severely punished in return.

That…I can understand. However this is going to be a double edged blade. All that preventing camping gameplay and backing down is all fine and dandy…unless you’re in something like a Churchill GC when reversing any time soon and getting out of the line of fire isn’t really an option :D.
Betting this nerf is going to make that weird tank even more shitty to play.

On the other hand, if you have a good assault gun(such as the Obj. 268), this nerf won’t mean much, you’re still gonna go up to your target, derp a 303mm pen shell in it’s face and gtfo(or alternatively, shoot-and-scoot from far away)

By: Takeda

Takeda — Thu, 15 May 2014 09:16:53 +0000

then by your statement, why KV-1S, one of the most played tanks isn’t nerfed? it’s not like people use prem ammo in like the T18 or anything.

By: zippy99

zippy99 — Thu, 15 May 2014 03:20:16 +0000

By your statement there should only be one tank in the whole game.
Each tank was tested by the developer’s before they got put in to the game, so it’s not my fault that you can’t play well against some tanks. This whole nerfing bull is not about balance anyway, it’s about getting people to chase after the new tanks. That’s how WOT makes money and that’s the real reason they nerf tanks, because if you have a good tank you are less likely to grind out another new tank. Now it’s time for me to go back to tier 3 and smash some more tomatoes.

By: goff0103

goff0103 — Thu, 15 May 2014 03:01:03 +0000

So many bad players calling for unnecessary nerfs. They will ruin WOT.

By: goff0103

goff0103 — Thu, 15 May 2014 03:00:00 +0000

Don’t think Gaijin sees it that way, in fact they may be counting on it.