<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9.0.4 Feedback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/15/9-0-4-feedback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/15/9-0-4-feedback/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: asuschrist</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/15/9-0-4-feedback/#comment-151073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[asuschrist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2014 00:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11934#comment-151073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wasn&#039;t it supposed to fix disconnects for people having AMD FX and Phenom processors.
I got an FX processor and I still keep getting disconnects... -.-]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t it supposed to fix disconnects for people having AMD FX and Phenom processors.<br />
I got an FX processor and I still keep getting disconnects&#8230; -.-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: than357</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/15/9-0-4-feedback/#comment-151058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[than357]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 22:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11934#comment-151058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Placebo?  I&#039;ve gotten around 5% increase in fps and the micro-lags are still there but shorter duration.  If only I had a decent route to the server it&#039;d be good.  Constant wobble between 30-250 ms.   Not to try to make much of it, but WT client sees sub-40 ms all the time I&#039;ve played it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Placebo?  I&#8217;ve gotten around 5% increase in fps and the micro-lags are still there but shorter duration.  If only I had a decent route to the server it&#8217;d be good.  Constant wobble between 30-250 ms.   Not to try to make much of it, but WT client sees sub-40 ms all the time I&#8217;ve played it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spaceman</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/15/9-0-4-feedback/#comment-151053</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spaceman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 22:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11934#comment-151053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yes it did help me with microlags..finally..it&#039;s still twitching here and there but much better..fps is around 35-60..ping is little higher but lags are less so i guess that is ok,,if they work in this direction to optimaze the game and not just buffing/nerfing people are enjoy the game more..i have amd phenomx2-4gb ram..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes it did help me with microlags..finally..it&#8217;s still twitching here and there but much better..fps is around 35-60..ping is little higher but lags are less so i guess that is ok,,if they work in this direction to optimaze the game and not just buffing/nerfing people are enjoy the game more..i have amd phenomx2-4gb ram..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franz-hofmann</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/15/9-0-4-feedback/#comment-151027</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[franz-hofmann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11934#comment-151027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must agree with SS battle loading times are indeed much better. No longer first battle reload time takes 2 min but as much as SS said.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must agree with SS battle loading times are indeed much better. No longer first battle reload time takes 2 min but as much as SS said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DKWK</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/15/9-0-4-feedback/#comment-150938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DKWK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 16:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11934#comment-150938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm I feel its just a bit faster but else all other problem still are there - so zzzzzzzzz wait for next round of micro patch or update to 0.9.1 to sort this like it was before 0.9.0.

Hell might go to War Thunder GF and try tonight again to learn to play the tanks there, as its not like in WoT and the stupid hiding cloak stuff, not to mention this another Arty weekend special Grrr.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm I feel its just a bit faster but else all other problem still are there &#8211; so zzzzzzzzz wait for next round of micro patch or update to 0.9.1 to sort this like it was before 0.9.0.</p>
<p>Hell might go to War Thunder GF and try tonight again to learn to play the tanks there, as its not like in WoT and the stupid hiding cloak stuff, not to mention this another Arty weekend special Grrr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shiner</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/15/9-0-4-feedback/#comment-150922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shiner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11934#comment-150922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have had 2 games hang mid battle and one BSD , 
not bad considering I never had any issues before great job WG lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had 2 games hang mid battle and one BSD ,<br />
not bad considering I never had any issues before great job WG lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/15/9-0-4-feedback/#comment-150859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[r]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 14:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11934#comment-150859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[not really, my game still plays like shit.

&quot;tank ANYWHERE on the map got destroyed? Here, have 10fps drop and lets make it sound like it was destroyed 10m away&quot;

oh and 20-30fps on Hidden Village is just awesome!
fuck this game, Im done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not really, my game still plays like shit.</p>
<p>&#8220;tank ANYWHERE on the map got destroyed? Here, have 10fps drop and lets make it sound like it was destroyed 10m away&#8221;</p>
<p>oh and 20-30fps on Hidden Village is just awesome!<br />
fuck this game, Im done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugii</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/15/9-0-4-feedback/#comment-150851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bugii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 14:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11934#comment-150851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[same here.
But I havent had any fps drops, no lags, no freezes and same loading times as ever...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>same here.<br />
But I havent had any fps drops, no lags, no freezes and same loading times as ever&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nufnuf</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/15/9-0-4-feedback/#comment-150775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nufnuf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 11:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11934#comment-150775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, I can definitelly advice to go for SSD. I am using various SSDs since 3 years and it has been the biggest performance jump regarding loading times, system features etc. Really really worth it.
With 240 GB SSD priced under 4000 CZK (roughly 145 E) - it is not that expensive and definitelly worth it. I went from 80 GB to 128 and now to 240 - which feels finally sufficient for operating system and several games installed. Secondary HDD can be normal one - just for regular data or some programs that dont need that speed.
WoT map loading will take 3-5 seconds - no freakin kidding. Rest of my set is quite regular mobo, Intel i5 cpu and 16 gigs of ram.

@SS: and last but not least - SSD acronym can not only be solid-state-disc - but also Silent Stalkers Disc :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I can definitelly advice to go for SSD. I am using various SSDs since 3 years and it has been the biggest performance jump regarding loading times, system features etc. Really really worth it.<br />
With 240 GB SSD priced under 4000 CZK (roughly 145 E) &#8211; it is not that expensive and definitelly worth it. I went from 80 GB to 128 and now to 240 &#8211; which feels finally sufficient for operating system and several games installed. Secondary HDD can be normal one &#8211; just for regular data or some programs that dont need that speed.<br />
WoT map loading will take 3-5 seconds &#8211; no freakin kidding. Rest of my set is quite regular mobo, Intel i5 cpu and 16 gigs of ram.</p>
<p>@SS: and last but not least &#8211; SSD acronym can not only be solid-state-disc &#8211; but also Silent Stalkers Disc :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fusk</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/15/9-0-4-feedback/#comment-150772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fusk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 11:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=11934#comment-150772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t notice any difference, my game plays the same.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t notice any difference, my game plays the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
