Comments on: World on Fire Stream QA

By: Duck_of_Death

Duck_of_Death — Thu, 15 May 2014 18:38:01 +0000

12pm at 2:30 yes at this time there are only 20k people online(but this is logic) but at 12pm there were about 150k people online and at 1pm there are about 100k its not that much because most people work go to school etc. at this time just look at WT and how many players are online there…

By: themuddyside

themuddyside — Thu, 15 May 2014 17:46:34 +0000

I was playing at 12pm (EU time) last night and there were only 10k players on both servers. I am based on NY so I get to play between 12pm-3am european times. I was playing this morning (NY time) – 1pm in Europe and there were only 80k players.

By: franz-hofmann

franz-hofmann — Thu, 15 May 2014 17:34:32 +0000

Yeah some cases my tank cant cross crushed buildings happened with my t-34 in ensk.

By: Duck_of_Death

Duck_of_Death — Thu, 15 May 2014 17:28:38 +0000

themuddyside:
are you blind or something yesterday and the day before Wot hat 220k players online on the EU Server and at 12:00 it were still around 150k yeah wot is having less and less players:D:D
WT fanboy ftw

By: Duck_of_Death

Duck_of_Death — Thu, 15 May 2014 17:26:19 +0000

for me WT ground forces is still boring as fuck only the graphics and Fps are good but the mechanics gameplay etc. is just no fun for me i will stay with wot and also Wot is far more better suited for E-sports etc. which also a lot of fun for me i mean i can play WTgf for some Hours but then i need days of break to get some fun with it again its a god game to play it from time to time but its not a ,,forever,, game like Wot(and also i hate these pay 2 win things in WT)

By: themuddyside

themuddyside — Thu, 15 May 2014 17:19:41 +0000

I am playing WoT for a year in the same machine, I have to play the game in low resolution where before I had my settings at medium quality, and to make things worse, my avg FPS is 30% less.

Then we have people like SS that play very little anymore because the performance issues.

After couple years, I run BF2BC last night, it is now 4 years old game and it runs in the same machine at high resolution and without any FPS issue. It is not great that WoT has worse graphics and performance issues than a 4 year old game.

I noticed that there is lot less people playing on the EU servers these last days, I know that the weather is better and so on, but after 12PM there are only 10k players on both EU servers. Even during the day, there is only 80k avg.

By: Guillermo Lovato

Guillermo Lovato — Thu, 15 May 2014 16:53:03 +0000

actually sky, i’ve played sim battles in all tiers and i find low to mid tiers the most fun (in high tiers the long reloads change everything).
i dont like realistic much, but sim is golden

By: Sky

Sky — Thu, 15 May 2014 15:49:47 +0000

Get to Tier 3, and play realistic battles before you consider leaving. WTGF is like WoT – low tiers suck, only unlike WoT – it offers 3 different levels of realism. Realistic Battles feel really great and require some skill, so most of the totally retarded noobs stay away from it.

By: Bugii

Bugii — Thu, 15 May 2014 15:04:46 +0000

imho the mechanic is stupid, but the gameplay feels good. its really fluid, looks good, runs well.

I will try it, but I will probably leave when im bored of the graphics.

By: Guillermo Lovato

Guillermo Lovato — Thu, 15 May 2014 15:02:50 +0000

no game stopping bugs, and they patch more often than wot and are not afraid to do weekly minifixes.
wot needs 6 months to do anything, and they only release “hotfixes” when they fucked up on a massive scale