<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Historical Battles &#8211; What do You Think?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/19/historical-battles-what-do-you-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/19/historical-battles-what-do-you-think/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlavioB</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/19/historical-battles-what-do-you-think/#comment-152091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FlavioB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 02:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12004#comment-152091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want to fix HB?
Make it stats-based.
Best player gets the best tank, worst player, worst tank. That way you don&#039;t depend on your 300WN8 Tiger II to win the match.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to fix HB?<br />
Make it stats-based.<br />
Best player gets the best tank, worst player, worst tank. That way you don&#8217;t depend on your 300WN8 Tiger II to win the match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miau</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/19/historical-battles-what-do-you-think/#comment-152087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 23:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12004#comment-152087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[need kv2 in HB n pak40]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>need kv2 in HB n pak40</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nixxxie</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/19/historical-battles-what-do-you-think/#comment-152086</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nixxxie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 23:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12004#comment-152086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First thing i&#039;d like to do is that they take into account custom ammo order - because now buing historical ammo set means reorder to standard for the purpose of the battle - and i am used to my own order.

Then they have to make it popular - throw a huge incentive for ALL tanks in historical, not only low tiers. Of course, low ties have to have even bigger incetive. You surely find some ideas yourselves but apart from xp/credit multiplier, a good one would be FREE XP multiplier(or even full value temporarily), so you can grind other tanks while playing historicals - that is even more appealing than just earning credits (there are so few tanks fitting to historicals). Or throw symbolic one gold per win?

As for battle balance: definitely NO bots, NO respawn.
Allow platoons in historicals.
You are definitely too late to make it anything besides another competitive mode, so you have put stress on competitive instead of historicality (you can&#039;t do much here).
You don&#039;t want to make &quot;special&quot; map for historicals - byt you should (at least advertise as such) and then put these historical maps in random rotation too (why bother, they are still special ;) , historical, only avalible for everyone).

To be honest, you&#039;d have to do another whole separate game for historicals - without bullshit &quot;tree&quot; and &quot;tiering&quot; (and hp too), but you most likely don&#039;t want to now (and can&#039;t fast enough or cheap enough either), so you have to live with what you have now and tweak it with minor improvements.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First thing i&#8217;d like to do is that they take into account custom ammo order &#8211; because now buing historical ammo set means reorder to standard for the purpose of the battle &#8211; and i am used to my own order.</p>
<p>Then they have to make it popular &#8211; throw a huge incentive for ALL tanks in historical, not only low tiers. Of course, low ties have to have even bigger incetive. You surely find some ideas yourselves but apart from xp/credit multiplier, a good one would be FREE XP multiplier(or even full value temporarily), so you can grind other tanks while playing historicals &#8211; that is even more appealing than just earning credits (there are so few tanks fitting to historicals). Or throw symbolic one gold per win?</p>
<p>As for battle balance: definitely NO bots, NO respawn.<br />
Allow platoons in historicals.<br />
You are definitely too late to make it anything besides another competitive mode, so you have put stress on competitive instead of historicality (you can&#8217;t do much here).<br />
You don&#8217;t want to make &#8220;special&#8221; map for historicals &#8211; byt you should (at least advertise as such) and then put these historical maps in random rotation too (why bother, they are still special ;) , historical, only avalible for everyone).</p>
<p>To be honest, you&#8217;d have to do another whole separate game for historicals &#8211; without bullshit &#8220;tree&#8221; and &#8220;tiering&#8221; (and hp too), but you most likely don&#8217;t want to now (and can&#8217;t fast enough or cheap enough either), so you have to live with what you have now and tweak it with minor improvements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArmoredColossus</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/19/historical-battles-what-do-you-think/#comment-152058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ArmoredColossus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 21:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12004#comment-152058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What? Only battles that Germans lost in...that is complete 100% coincidence...NOPE NO RUSSIAN BIAS HERE ~ Serb]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? Only battles that Germans lost in&#8230;that is complete 100% coincidence&#8230;NOPE NO RUSSIAN BIAS HERE ~ Serb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/19/historical-battles-what-do-you-think/#comment-152054</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 21:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12004#comment-152054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As others have stated, one of the big problems with historical battles is all the people that want to drive the top tier vehicles instead of the more common ones.  Frankly, I feel that War Thunder had the right idea when it came to this sort of balance by giving lighter vehicles respawns, while heavy tanks can&#039;t respawn once their dead.  This gives people in the lighter vehicles the ability to make some mistakes, and more opportunities to contribute and make up for getting derped in the face by that unseen SU-152 in the first two minutes of the battle.

This also works from a historical perspective, as it allows for larger numbers of the more common vehicles in any given battle.

For example, let&#039;s use the Ardennes battle.

On the German side, the Tiger II drivers and possibly the Jagdpanther drivers would get no respawns.  The Panthers would get one respawn each, and the StuGs and Panzer IVs would get two or three respawns each.

On the American side, the Jacksons, Hellcats and Sherman Jumbos might get one respawn each (possibly no respawns in the case of the Jackson), and the regular M4s would get two or three respawns each.

Make sense?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As others have stated, one of the big problems with historical battles is all the people that want to drive the top tier vehicles instead of the more common ones.  Frankly, I feel that War Thunder had the right idea when it came to this sort of balance by giving lighter vehicles respawns, while heavy tanks can&#8217;t respawn once their dead.  This gives people in the lighter vehicles the ability to make some mistakes, and more opportunities to contribute and make up for getting derped in the face by that unseen SU-152 in the first two minutes of the battle.</p>
<p>This also works from a historical perspective, as it allows for larger numbers of the more common vehicles in any given battle.</p>
<p>For example, let&#8217;s use the Ardennes battle.</p>
<p>On the German side, the Tiger II drivers and possibly the Jagdpanther drivers would get no respawns.  The Panthers would get one respawn each, and the StuGs and Panzer IVs would get two or three respawns each.</p>
<p>On the American side, the Jacksons, Hellcats and Sherman Jumbos might get one respawn each (possibly no respawns in the case of the Jackson), and the regular M4s would get two or three respawns each.</p>
<p>Make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oglop</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/19/historical-battles-what-do-you-think/#comment-152048</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[oglop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 20:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12004#comment-152048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TBH I played HB only at test server, and I liked it .. when I tried it on regular server I got 5 minute waiting time... which convinced me to not even try that shit

BTW I prefered to play lower tiers there]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TBH I played HB only at test server, and I liked it .. when I tried it on regular server I got 5 minute waiting time&#8230; which convinced me to not even try that shit</p>
<p>BTW I prefered to play lower tiers there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anlushac11</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/19/historical-battles-what-do-you-think/#comment-152033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anlushac11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 19:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12004#comment-152033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My only complaint with historical battles were the overwhelming number of super tanks. 

I lost count of how many Kursk battles I played on test server where the match revolved around 12 SU-152&#039;s and 1 T-34 and one KV-1S/T-70 and Germans were either all Tigers and maybe one PzIII or PzIV and a Ferdinand thrown in occasionally . 

No one wants to play that. That makes HB slighly better than Confrontation and Confrontation was a unbalanced lopsided mess.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only complaint with historical battles were the overwhelming number of super tanks. </p>
<p>I lost count of how many Kursk battles I played on test server where the match revolved around 12 SU-152&#8242;s and 1 T-34 and one KV-1S/T-70 and Germans were either all Tigers and maybe one PzIII or PzIV and a Ferdinand thrown in occasionally . </p>
<p>No one wants to play that. That makes HB slighly better than Confrontation and Confrontation was a unbalanced lopsided mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xelos</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/19/historical-battles-what-do-you-think/#comment-152014</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xelos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 18:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12004#comment-152014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Historical battles: Making scrubs (bad players) feel bad-ass since 2014. Why would I play this trash mode? So some 44% player has a chance against me cause he&#039;s 3-4 tiers higher.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Historical battles: Making scrubs (bad players) feel bad-ass since 2014. Why would I play this trash mode? So some 44% player has a chance against me cause he&#8217;s 3-4 tiers higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Treborn</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/19/historical-battles-what-do-you-think/#comment-151958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Treborn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 16:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12004#comment-151958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember how many fanboys Historical Battle mod had one year ago. Everyone was bashing WoT for not implementing such a beautiful mod..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember how many fanboys Historical Battle mod had one year ago. Everyone was bashing WoT for not implementing such a beautiful mod..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bumblyjack .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/19/historical-battles-what-do-you-think/#comment-151910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bumblyjack .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 15:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12004#comment-151910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I play on the RU server. They got people to play HB by giving a lot of missions with credit bonuses.

Part of it was a 25k credit bonus for playing a historical battle, up to 5x per day for each battle. So, you could get up to 375k credits in bonuses daily. They also gave you a free Gun Laying Drive if you played 60 HB in the first 10 days after the patch.

I played 15 battles a day for four days and got my Gun Laying Drive and a 1.5 million credit bonus. I found that scouting with the Churchill III in Kursk was the most profitable. The whole experience was tolerable but I&#039;m not interested in playing more HB unless there&#039;s an incentive again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I play on the RU server. They got people to play HB by giving a lot of missions with credit bonuses.</p>
<p>Part of it was a 25k credit bonus for playing a historical battle, up to 5x per day for each battle. So, you could get up to 375k credits in bonuses daily. They also gave you a free Gun Laying Drive if you played 60 HB in the first 10 days after the patch.</p>
<p>I played 15 battles a day for four days and got my Gun Laying Drive and a 1.5 million credit bonus. I found that scouting with the Churchill III in Kursk was the most profitable. The whole experience was tolerable but I&#8217;m not interested in playing more HB unless there&#8217;s an incentive again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
