Comments on: Are WoT Developers Confused as to What To Do Now?

By: cernoalpha

cernoalpha — Fri, 23 May 2014 05:47:59 +0000

probably not, but that is not what i am hoping for. I am hoping for is for them to keep trying new and interesting ideas, and use the ones that the players seem to like.

By: Guillermo Lovato

Guillermo Lovato — Thu, 22 May 2014 22:42:21 +0000

apparently you’re the retard here.
and he’s not just telling me to go play WTGF, he’s impliying that i’m “whining” about invisible tanks(very realistic and historical feature!, romulan cloaking tanks!) and that i dont knwo the mechanics(which i know way more than he does) and that i need to “adapt”. those are stupid taunts from a stupid player, period.
why dont you go adapt to having a knife put in your belly, “stop whining and deal with it”, same kind of retard answer he gave

By: Rhyme45

Rhyme45 — Thu, 22 May 2014 14:41:08 +0000

*In a JFK manner* I say just improve the Random Battles and balance out the tanks!
Okay, yeah, I like how they keep adding tanks (despite being almost the same, like you said), maps, graphics (allowing it to be more playable to owners of weak-specced laptops), and practically all over content but isn’t it time that they try to focus AWAY from the tanks and start to look INTO the community and players?

By: KirkNaglas

KirkNaglas — Thu, 22 May 2014 14:07:49 +0000

Client is one side of accumulated problems. But Server issues are the second and for me most significant problem.
Servers just can’t do their jobs. To many balancing and toooo many helps for wallet ignorants.
If there is someone who still think that is MM isn’t skill based and just skill and “RNG” desides winners – JUST TRY TO PLAY ACCOUNT FROM SOME KID OR TOMMATO FRIEND.
U will see how works MM, REAL camo-factor, REAL penetration etc…
In the end, now we have frustrating fixed arcade game with laaaaaagish server.
To many managers thinking about cash-flow… THIS IS PROBLEM

By: Adinouvo

Adinouvo — Thu, 22 May 2014 13:58:38 +0000

Yup, super HD models shouldn’t be done. Correct models and maybe something in between what we have in the current HD models and the new models would be a good idea.

By: Adinouvo

Adinouvo — Thu, 22 May 2014 13:56:52 +0000

Still, it would be a MUCH better solution and I wouldn’t mind getting mini-updates for half a year or so which only add small improvements if the game would switch to a lighter engine.

By: Ashmodiel

Ashmodiel — Thu, 22 May 2014 13:17:38 +0000

TBH I would like to play HBs, but it’s impossible to get some people to play at least one.

Idea is not bad as such. It could be excellent way to gain XP on less liked tanks. Unfortunately WG didn’t prepared early battles like France 1940, where low tier tanks could be used. Without EU tree it’s impossible to make Poland 1939 or some early clashes in Africa. It’s a shame.

By: Ashmodiel

Ashmodiel — Thu, 22 May 2014 12:41:53 +0000

I guess that Windows Update, performing updates every two, three days, strains interntet “motorways” even more that few GB update.

Windows Update patches are very small, several MB ones are rare. Even more, WU patches are optional. WoT updates are much much larger and are obligatory.

Moreover, most people just get the client updated, so thay usually do not donwload full client.

Still such updates are substantially larger with several hundred MB each.

By: goff0103

goff0103 — Thu, 22 May 2014 09:54:59 +0000

Sorry but us historical tanks supporters prefer realism and WOT is turning into a joke now that WT has tanks. You can stay there if you like but we are leaving.

By: goff0103

goff0103 — Thu, 22 May 2014 09:52:10 +0000

WOT has turn into another Call of Duty game, the only players who support it now obviously don’t play it because of historical tanks. We are probably better off leaving this game and going to WTGF.