<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9.1 CT Patch Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/22/9-1-patch-notes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/22/9-1-patch-notes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/22/9-1-patch-notes/#comment-153518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 19:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12094#comment-153518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, and in case anybody wonders why I say some of the battles in France back  in 1940 would be more balanced?  Well, here&#039;s some of my logic to support this:

None of the tanks involved are higher than tier 4.  On the French side, the highest tier vehicles are the Char B1 and the SAu-40, while the Germans have the StuG III B at tier 4 (representing a StuG III A in this case).  Most of the tanks involved, however, are tier 3 (such as the D2, Renault UE 57, Panzer IIIA and Panzer IVA).  This makes it more accessible to more people.

In addition there&#039;s very few tanks involved at the time of the campaign that could be considered imbalanced with their historical equipment (except, perhaps, for the Matilda II, which the Germans could only KO with the 88 mm flak gun at the time).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and in case anybody wonders why I say some of the battles in France back  in 1940 would be more balanced?  Well, here&#8217;s some of my logic to support this:</p>
<p>None of the tanks involved are higher than tier 4.  On the French side, the highest tier vehicles are the Char B1 and the SAu-40, while the Germans have the StuG III B at tier 4 (representing a StuG III A in this case).  Most of the tanks involved, however, are tier 3 (such as the D2, Renault UE 57, Panzer IIIA and Panzer IVA).  This makes it more accessible to more people.</p>
<p>In addition there&#8217;s very few tanks involved at the time of the campaign that could be considered imbalanced with their historical equipment (except, perhaps, for the Matilda II, which the Germans could only KO with the 88 mm flak gun at the time).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/22/9-1-patch-notes/#comment-153510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 18:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12094#comment-153510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with Kursk is all the scrubs that wanted to drive Tigers and SU-152s.  I made a point in NOT cueing up in mine for Kursk for that reason, but even in the SU-85 or Churchill III, I just couldn&#039;t get into a game.

The Battle of the Bulge was just horrendously imbalanced too, but NOT in favor of the Germans, since the Germans could only win if the team worked together (and usually, they didn&#039;t).  All the Americans had to do was either zerg rush the Germans or dogpile the cap and they won every time.

Having lower-tiered historical battles will open it up to more people and thus hopefully shorten the wait time (though I do question their logic of having T-34s and KV-1s going up against Panzer IIIs with 37 mm guns and Panzer IVs with 75 mm snub-nosed howitzers - it&#039;s historical, but hopelessly imbalanced - a better option, imo, would have been the Battle of Arras in France, 1940)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Kursk is all the scrubs that wanted to drive Tigers and SU-152s.  I made a point in NOT cueing up in mine for Kursk for that reason, but even in the SU-85 or Churchill III, I just couldn&#8217;t get into a game.</p>
<p>The Battle of the Bulge was just horrendously imbalanced too, but NOT in favor of the Germans, since the Germans could only win if the team worked together (and usually, they didn&#8217;t).  All the Americans had to do was either zerg rush the Germans or dogpile the cap and they won every time.</p>
<p>Having lower-tiered historical battles will open it up to more people and thus hopefully shorten the wait time (though I do question their logic of having T-34s and KV-1s going up against Panzer IIIs with 37 mm guns and Panzer IVs with 75 mm snub-nosed howitzers &#8211; it&#8217;s historical, but hopelessly imbalanced &#8211; a better option, imo, would have been the Battle of Arras in France, 1940)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/22/9-1-patch-notes/#comment-153508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 18:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12094#comment-153508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think THAT&#039;S bad?  I watched a friend of mine troll a T32 in his partly-upgraded Panzer 38nA on Ruinberg back in patch 7.5 (BEFORE gold ammo for credits was implemented), and ended up killing it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think THAT&#8217;S bad?  I watched a friend of mine troll a T32 in his partly-upgraded Panzer 38nA on Ruinberg back in patch 7.5 (BEFORE gold ammo for credits was implemented), and ended up killing it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/22/9-1-patch-notes/#comment-153506</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 18:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12094#comment-153506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And the Marder II.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the Marder II.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/22/9-1-patch-notes/#comment-153505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 18:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12094#comment-153505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I might have to consider getting one now. :/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might have to consider getting one now. :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evi7stylez .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/22/9-1-patch-notes/#comment-153271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evi7stylez .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 08:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12094#comment-153271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yap, especially now in summer time, when sun is shining all day long, I can&#039;t see shit in that extra dark map..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yap, especially now in summer time, when sun is shining all day long, I can&#8217;t see shit in that extra dark map..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evi7stylez .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/22/9-1-patch-notes/#comment-153270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evi7stylez .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 08:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12094#comment-153270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fixed the bug that caused equipment mounted on a vehicle to be displayed in a random order in battles.
----------------------------------------------

F***, yeah WG! Took only couple of years to fix it. I even cannot count those lost battles because of pressing &quot;4&quot; on my keybard didn&#039;t give me the option to repair something but reloaded my ammo to gold rounds. So, instead of getting to hell out of open field and shooting back, I was still tracked and got another forced reload to unnecesary ammo.
Hope, it will be really fixed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed the bug that caused equipment mounted on a vehicle to be displayed in a random order in battles.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>F***, yeah WG! Took only couple of years to fix it. I even cannot count those lost battles because of pressing &#8220;4&#8243; on my keybard didn&#8217;t give me the option to repair something but reloaded my ammo to gold rounds. So, instead of getting to hell out of open field and shooting back, I was still tracked and got another forced reload to unnecesary ammo.<br />
Hope, it will be really fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocri</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/22/9-1-patch-notes/#comment-153260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 07:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12094#comment-153260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Appearance frequency of Ruinberg on Fire map has been decreased&quot; thank God for that.  Altough i like Ruinberg map i hate the Ruinberg on Fire variant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Appearance frequency of Ruinberg on Fire map has been decreased&#8221; thank God for that.  Altough i like Ruinberg map i hate the Ruinberg on Fire variant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UNDEAD_DC</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/22/9-1-patch-notes/#comment-153253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UNDEAD_DC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 06:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12094#comment-153253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks for the list, lots of good things especially no arty nerf YAY 
and isnt the name of the map kharkov instead of kharkiv?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the list, lots of good things especially no arty nerf YAY<br />
and isnt the name of the map kharkov instead of kharkiv?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhiliPTran</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/22/9-1-patch-notes/#comment-153242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PhiliPTran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 05:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12094#comment-153242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love my 59-16 and type 64. Autoloader on 59-16?  Bad idea]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my 59-16 and type 64. Autoloader on 59-16?  Bad idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
