<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Tank Spotted in 9.1 Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/23/new-tank-spotted-in-9-1-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/23/new-tank-spotted-in-9-1-video/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ouchthathurts</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/23/new-tank-spotted-in-9-1-video/#comment-153919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ouchthathurts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 09:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12116#comment-153919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems to me a tier 8 premium is the most likely option, as this would maintain the frequent (though by no means universal) thing where premium tanks get something less the best gun of credit tanks at the same tier. (The 17-pdr is the best gun on the Black Prince.)

Though I&#039;d prefer that they make it a medium, I see no reason why WG wouldn&#039;t make it a heavy instead. After all, it&#039;s not like the British line is much better for high-tier heavy trainers (the best available is the tier 6 TOG II*) than medium, and WG has for years seen no reason to fill &quot;holes&quot; in the premium tank offerings. (Note the continuing lack of a high-tier Russian medium, and the lack of even plans for a high-tier US TD.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me a tier 8 premium is the most likely option, as this would maintain the frequent (though by no means universal) thing where premium tanks get something less the best gun of credit tanks at the same tier. (The 17-pdr is the best gun on the Black Prince.)</p>
<p>Though I&#8217;d prefer that they make it a medium, I see no reason why WG wouldn&#8217;t make it a heavy instead. After all, it&#8217;s not like the British line is much better for high-tier heavy trainers (the best available is the tier 6 TOG II*) than medium, and WG has for years seen no reason to fill &#8220;holes&#8221; in the premium tank offerings. (Note the continuing lack of a high-tier Russian medium, and the lack of even plans for a high-tier US TD.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madner Kami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/23/new-tank-spotted-in-9-1-video/#comment-153704</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madner Kami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2014 12:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12116#comment-153704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would be a terrible T8 Premium, really, unless it gets limited matchmaking to 9 (only when medium) or 8 (when heavy). Nobody would buy it otherwise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be a terrible T8 Premium, really, unless it gets limited matchmaking to 9 (only when medium) or 8 (when heavy). Nobody would buy it otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madner Kami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/23/new-tank-spotted-in-9-1-video/#comment-153703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madner Kami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2014 12:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12116#comment-153703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fuck removal of FV4202. If it gets un-tier-10ed, at least make it a T8 premium. This vehicle is too awesome to get shoved into the garbage can.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck removal of FV4202. If it gets un-tier-10ed, at least make it a T8 premium. This vehicle is too awesome to get shoved into the garbage can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madner Kami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/23/new-tank-spotted-in-9-1-video/#comment-153702</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madner Kami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2014 12:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12116#comment-153702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thought the same. I&#039;d rather bet my money on an alternative hull, back from when that was a thing in development. Wouldn&#039;t mind getting it as a T7 Premium though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought the same. I&#8217;d rather bet my money on an alternative hull, back from when that was a thing in development. Wouldn&#8217;t mind getting it as a T7 Premium though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madner Kami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/23/new-tank-spotted-in-9-1-video/#comment-153701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madner Kami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2014 12:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12116#comment-153701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty much this. The 17 Pounder is a damn good gun, but it&#039;s usability on a slow platform is highly questionable and I say this as an avid Black Prince lover. It only works there because of the BP&#039;s armor and having it on a 30 to 34 km/h vehicle with Centurion-to-Caernarvon-levels of armor is a terrible prospect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty much this. The 17 Pounder is a damn good gun, but it&#8217;s usability on a slow platform is highly questionable and I say this as an avid Black Prince lover. It only works there because of the BP&#8217;s armor and having it on a 30 to 34 km/h vehicle with Centurion-to-Caernarvon-levels of armor is a terrible prospect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madner Kami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/23/new-tank-spotted-in-9-1-video/#comment-153697</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madner Kami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2014 11:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12116#comment-153697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really? Pushing the Cearnarvon onto Tier 9 and Conqueror on Tier 10? Those are the two worst ideas anyone could have in regard to &quot;fixing&quot; the T10 fantasy tanks.

P.S.: Hands off my FV215b. It has to stay there because it&#039;s awesome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? Pushing the Cearnarvon onto Tier 9 and Conqueror on Tier 10? Those are the two worst ideas anyone could have in regard to &#8220;fixing&#8221; the T10 fantasy tanks.</p>
<p>P.S.: Hands off my FV215b. It has to stay there because it&#8217;s awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CynicalDutchie</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/23/new-tank-spotted-in-9-1-video/#comment-153493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CynicalDutchie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 17:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12116#comment-153493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Less armor than that shitfest of a BP? Impossible!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Less armor than that shitfest of a BP? Impossible!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not SerB</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/23/new-tank-spotted-in-9-1-video/#comment-153464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Not SerB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 15:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12116#comment-153464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So do Germans, Americans and Chinese]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So do Germans, Americans and Chinese</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joyuesp</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/23/new-tank-spotted-in-9-1-video/#comment-153448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joyuesp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 15:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12116#comment-153448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sp moves like a heavy, ofc it will be more agile, but again your armor will be worse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sp moves like a heavy, ofc it will be more agile, but again your armor will be worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exter</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/23/new-tank-spotted-in-9-1-video/#comment-153441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[exter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 15:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12116#comment-153441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Listywould it be much to ask you to write a short summary of what is actually knoe about A45 Carnavaeron and Conquer development?
Pretty pls!
PS: just a short overview, that is all i ask for!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Listywould it be much to ask you to write a short summary of what is actually knoe about A45 Carnavaeron and Conquer development?<br />
Pretty pls!<br />
PS: just a short overview, that is all i ask for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
