Comments on: 26.5.2014 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/26/26-5-2014/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: Rusty Doorknob http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/26/26-5-2014/#comment-154871 Tue, 27 May 2014 17:23:50 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12212#comment-154871 “too many TD’s in battles? “Statistics do not confirm that” and “We do not observe the dominance of TD’s””

And how about matchmaking wonders when one team is given 3 TDs while other gets 9? Do they “not observe” this too?

]]> By: Medjed http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/26/26-5-2014/#comment-154816 Tue, 27 May 2014 15:12:33 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12212#comment-154816 It fucking is. Either you have historical tanks and their modules or you have both historical and blueprints tanks, but since you went for the latter one then you can’t screw some tank’s balance by saying ok we won’t give it better gun because it historically didn’t had one. There is no fucking historical accuracy if you have a tank like waffleshit e100 in your game. You can give any gun to a tank just for the sake of balance and not only when it fits you. It’s called double standards.

]]> By: Skarakien http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/26/26-5-2014/#comment-154679 Tue, 27 May 2014 12:08:58 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12212#comment-154679 Maus says hi!

]]> By: Skarakien http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/26/26-5-2014/#comment-154666 Tue, 27 May 2014 11:20:43 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12212#comment-154666 If you replied earlier to the question, then HOTLINK THE ANSWER! You don’t even need to come up with new slogans. :)

]]> By: Skarakien http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/26/26-5-2014/#comment-154664 Tue, 27 May 2014 11:17:27 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12212#comment-154664 Churchill 1 says hi!

]]> By: Skarakien http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/26/26-5-2014/#comment-154663 Tue, 27 May 2014 11:16:40 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12212#comment-154663 Then say “I will investigate more on this subject on monday. Please be patient.”
This would sound like a not asshole kind of response.

]]> By: Skarakien http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/26/26-5-2014/#comment-154661 Tue, 27 May 2014 11:13:51 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12212#comment-154661 - Storm states that when it comes to historicity of guns in World of Tanks – made up tanks (WT E-100) can have any gun that fits, historical tanks can only have guns they had in real life

“This is an Object square 2. It’s basicly a T-34 BUT it can fit a 152mm gun and a 5000 HP engine. It will be in tier 4.”

- Storm reacting on the “28 bots in one game” video: “You’d have to find out what is shown in there in general and how it happened. Personally, I don’t have time to do this on Sunday. Sorry.”

You have an issue that needs us to investigate? Sorry, we don’t care even if it’s our main focus.

]]> By: nononononono http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/26/26-5-2014/#comment-154503 Tue, 27 May 2014 05:31:14 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12212#comment-154503 I agree…they are revolting…let them eat cake :D

]]> By: goff0103 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/26/26-5-2014/#comment-154487 Tue, 27 May 2014 00:07:30 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12212#comment-154487 Agree, how would would we know installing these kinds of guns would not tear off from the hull when fired due to the massive recoil. These are after all designs concept. That is why they should not add paper tanks in the game.

]]> By: goff0103 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/26/26-5-2014/#comment-154486 Tue, 27 May 2014 00:02:26 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12212#comment-154486 I was being sarcastic, another example of WG logic. No wonder I prefer playing WT.

]]>