Comments on: 29.5.2014

By: mybackhurts

mybackhurts — Fri, 30 May 2014 19:25:16 +0000

i don’t have a high end comp, more middle of the road, but when i switched triple buffering to false in the appdata i got an immediate and permanent increase in fps from 20-25 up to35-45. had an issue the other day where my computer became sentient and decided to restore itself to a point from 3 months ago, after the game reloaded the patch the fps was back to the 20′s and the tr-buff was back on, fixed it the same way. have to wonder what kind of “extensive testing” they are doing. saw a while back that they were blaming some of this fps loss and fixes on a placebo effect, had to laugh at that, i didn’t know that the placebo effect could change the fps NUMBER on the screen, in game. mighty powerful powers of suggestion if they work on inanimate objects.

By: exocet6951

exocet6951 — Fri, 30 May 2014 18:59:43 +0000

SO what if they don’t have a tierX medium? What’s game-breaking?

As for the premium…you still have the tierIX and tier IIX….

Still not a catastrophic fail of game design as you put it.
just you trying to make every nation have the same 4 core branches, which is boring.

By: real tic

real tic — Fri, 30 May 2014 16:06:36 +0000

I propose using papermaché actionx as target practice premium t8, retaining fv4202 at tier 8 or 9, introducing chieftain mk 3 at tier 10.

Of course I expect instant obedience to my wishes or WG will be struck by a bolt of lightening and Serbs balls will fry for eternity.

beat that for reasoned argumentation.
voila.

By: Alexander Yordanov

Alexander Yordanov — Fri, 30 May 2014 15:11:23 +0000

I propose a simple move for FV as a premium tank.
The Action X as tier 10 med.
And Cheiftain as a heavy. Simple as that.

By: Alexander Yordanov

Alexander Yordanov — Fri, 30 May 2014 15:10:14 +0000

because that means the british do not have a medium tank. That means premium tanks lose a possible crew, one of the major tank types in WOT is ignored.

Its bad game design

By: xidex

xidex — Fri, 30 May 2014 13:39:27 +0000

http://www.vbaddict.net/statistics.php?tier=8&tanktype=2&nation=0&premium=0&modeid=0&team=0&battles=1000&groupby=0&fieldname=won_lost_ratio&server=
This just speaks for everything.

By: RustyNail

RustyNail — Fri, 30 May 2014 13:18:48 +0000

True, Type is a little bit OP. Its winrate is simply too good for premium tank, its technical parameters (in sum) are still not average (= between stock and fully researched / top) of regular tanks.

Good comparison could be found … http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/396763-type-59-change-will-come/page__pid__8210400#entry8210400

Possible solution … http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/396763-type-59-change-will-come/page__pid__8210661#entry8210661

By: Skarakien

Skarakien — Fri, 30 May 2014 11:51:28 +0000

“We, for example, compared in this way the performance on the computers of players from Minsk, who agreed to lend them to us to study the issues.”

And their bank accounts? :)

By: real tic

real tic — Fri, 30 May 2014 11:30:15 +0000

agreed fv4202 is a tier 8, with the original 20pdr. It deserves a separate branch starting at tier 8, leading to prototype chieftain at tier 9, and mk3 chieftain at tier 10.

as for the top of the current medium line I see no alternative but either a magic pony or a paper napkin coffee break design found somewhere by someone like listy, but most definetely not a centurion variant. If this is not possible, absoutely must be a chieftain mk3.

By: xidex

xidex — Fri, 30 May 2014 11:00:55 +0000

and here I meet eXterminus again (1st time on topic “the best line to grind” or smthing like that) and again I fully agree with you. Type59 is more than capable to act as a regular tank. Since it is a premium tank which has preferencial MM it is unbalanced compared to others premium vehicles.