Comments on: New Armored Warfare Trailer

By: lightball20

lightball20 — Fri, 30 May 2014 17:54:47 +0000

This game is Russian bias because on most tiers the Russians get out performed by everyone!!

By: Beaver157

Beaver157 — Fri, 30 May 2014 02:50:30 +0000

No, there is bias towards the Russians and against the Germans. Some exceptions, such as the T110E5 being more effective than the IS-7,do not constitute a bias towards US vehicles.

By: ggram

ggram — Thu, 29 May 2014 23:23:00 +0000

We already have overperforming murican tanks: T18, M18, T29, T49, M53/55, M4, T57… Do you even wot, bro?

By: Retia

Retia — Thu, 29 May 2014 19:37:00 +0000

It’s called gunners losing their shit and forgetting their training.
In the 21st century with guns capable of shooting with perfect accuracy the only margin of error that remains is the gunner.

Again, as written above, gunners are trained to aim at a tank’s turret ring, which is unarmored and will always result in a tank either being disabled or destroyed.

By: Guillermo Lovato

Guillermo Lovato — Thu, 29 May 2014 19:13:45 +0000

AW looks to be the closest to WOT as it seems it will keep be an arcade game with modern tanks.

WTGF is on a different level of game, offering true tank battles as they should be.

By: Guillermo Lovato

Guillermo Lovato — Thu, 29 May 2014 19:08:46 +0000

Also the yanks have DU penetrators (the silver thingy ones), all other nations dont.

btw in that famous friendly fire incident in Iraq back in 89, M1s proved unable to reliable kill themselves, even with DU sabot….

By: Guillermo Lovato

Guillermo Lovato — Thu, 29 May 2014 19:05:33 +0000

i find it fascinating to have to configure and set/use/lock the firing computer and see them BLOW in screen, i could do that ALL DAY(btw, you already do that with arty in wot, yu have a fake sat view, your “firing computer” aims for the target and you kill them beyond their ability to retaliate)
and even with FCS shots can still miss if gun is not properly boresighted/wind not typed correctly.

realism IS fun, it’s automatic.

By: JPK

JPK — Thu, 29 May 2014 18:52:19 +0000

OMG!!!111
ARMORED WARFARE KILLER OF WOT
guyz leave this sinking ship world of tanks armored warfare is the new tank game
wargaming sux

By: fusk

fusk — Thu, 29 May 2014 17:10:44 +0000

Looks nice, but remember they’ve haven’t even started alpha yet, so it might be a year before we see this game go public.

By: hornet331

hornet331 — Thu, 29 May 2014 16:29:59 +0000

>you do realize that the big world engine was the only engine the back than poor wg founders could afford?

no not really, it was the most cost efficient solution. They easily could used solutions like the cryengine or unreal, hell the cryengine would be even free, they only would ask for royalties if there game would exceed a certain amount of revenue.

And they didn’t even had to do that, a even smaller company like PGI (MWO) could afford a license for the cryengine.

They chose the engine because it came as a whole package, with a complete server backend for MMOs, where things like unreal or cryengine are just and foremost render engines and it was quite cheap.

You also seem to think WoT was the first game from WG, while it was not. They had the financle means to get better engines, they just never bothered because why invest in something when something cheaper does the same job and history proves them right.