<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1.6.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/1-6-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/1-6-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snowpilot</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/1-6-2014/#comment-157308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snowpilot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12498#comment-157308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, couple things here.

One, there isn&#039;t a single tank in the game that can pen the front of an IS7&#039;s turret with a straight-in shot. You obviously have no clue how the normalization mechanics work. The HEAT round from a Jag E100 doesn&#039;t get normalized against rounded, sloped or angled armor, so it bounces. EVERY TIME!

Yeah, on paper 420 pen will go through, until you look at how the turret is shaped. No go, Sonny Jim.

Two, the Jag E100 isn&#039;t exactly the most accurate TD in the game. I&#039;ve routinely had rounds go no where NEAR my point of aim, even when fully reticled down.

Three, most Jag E100 drivers I play with don&#039;t just spam the HEAT at everything they see. Hell, half the time you DON&#039;T want to throw HEAT at a tank (for instance, the side of an IS7 or IS4). Spaced armor and all that. I&#039;ve been carrying more HE these days because most of the games I get into are infested with noobs in waffentragers. Slap an HE round into one of them, and they will scatter like the cockroaches they are.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, couple things here.</p>
<p>One, there isn&#8217;t a single tank in the game that can pen the front of an IS7&#8242;s turret with a straight-in shot. You obviously have no clue how the normalization mechanics work. The HEAT round from a Jag E100 doesn&#8217;t get normalized against rounded, sloped or angled armor, so it bounces. EVERY TIME!</p>
<p>Yeah, on paper 420 pen will go through, until you look at how the turret is shaped. No go, Sonny Jim.</p>
<p>Two, the Jag E100 isn&#8217;t exactly the most accurate TD in the game. I&#8217;ve routinely had rounds go no where NEAR my point of aim, even when fully reticled down.</p>
<p>Three, most Jag E100 drivers I play with don&#8217;t just spam the HEAT at everything they see. Hell, half the time you DON&#8217;T want to throw HEAT at a tank (for instance, the side of an IS7 or IS4). Spaced armor and all that. I&#8217;ve been carrying more HE these days because most of the games I get into are infested with noobs in waffentragers. Slap an HE round into one of them, and they will scatter like the cockroaches they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snowpilot</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/1-6-2014/#comment-157306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snowpilot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12498#comment-157306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[3 arty per side isn&#039;t a lot. I stopped playing for a while around patch 7.4 (I still had the L70 75mm on my panzer 4 at the time!) and I would see games with TEN arty on a side. Those games just royally sucked.

Tank drivers these days have no idea how good they have it these days arty-wise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 arty per side isn&#8217;t a lot. I stopped playing for a while around patch 7.4 (I still had the L70 75mm on my panzer 4 at the time!) and I would see games with TEN arty on a side. Those games just royally sucked.</p>
<p>Tank drivers these days have no idea how good they have it these days arty-wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/1-6-2014/#comment-157135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 09:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12498#comment-157135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IS-4M is much better. IS-3 is Tiger 2 105mm equivalent]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IS-4M is much better. IS-3 is Tiger 2 105mm equivalent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkksir</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/1-6-2014/#comment-157067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jkksir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 23:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12498#comment-157067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wel Storm i have one thing to say to you about never hearing of the ,,rare&#039;&#039; bug of cruise control error : ,,Fuck you&#039;&#039; because your ,,rare&#039;&#039; bug killed me like 3 f-ing times. And no I did not miss tap the f key because I don&#039;t have cruise control for back just for front, the back one is undesignated. One time I just stared at the 3 bars going green and the tank YOLO-ing into a pit, then into an FV183s  firing line and then into an artys shell, yep... at the last one I was like o.o then 0.0  and then O.O.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wel Storm i have one thing to say to you about never hearing of the ,,rare&#8221; bug of cruise control error : ,,Fuck you&#8221; because your ,,rare&#8221; bug killed me like 3 f-ing times. And no I did not miss tap the f key because I don&#8217;t have cruise control for back just for front, the back one is undesignated. One time I just stared at the 3 bars going green and the tank YOLO-ing into a pit, then into an FV183s  firing line and then into an artys shell, yep&#8230; at the last one I was like o.o then 0.0  and then O.O.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joyuesp</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/1-6-2014/#comment-157045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joyuesp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12498#comment-157045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[how terrible is gaijin, wg doesnt do that, because the tiger 2(entered service in 1943) faces tanks like the stb-1(first produced in 1967)...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how terrible is gaijin, wg doesnt do that, because the tiger 2(entered service in 1943) faces tanks like the stb-1(first produced in 1967)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillermo Lovato</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/1-6-2014/#comment-157033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guillermo Lovato]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 19:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12498#comment-157033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;despite taking no damage.&quot;.... if it gets oneshotted then it took MASSIVE DAMAGE.
Russian 85mm gun is incrdibly deadly, your tinderbox german tank has only 100mm armor at best, you think an 85 wont punch though that at less than 500m?
http://tankarchives.blogspot.ca/2013/03/soviet-85-mm-guns-vs-tigers.html
Target: side. Distance: 1450 m. Result: penetration, breach entrance diameter 110 mm, exit diameter 380 mm. A fragment 700 mm by 92 mm by 82 mm was knocked off. Cracks 220 mm, 200 mm, and 180 mm in length developed.&quot;

that&#039;s 1450m oneshotted by rusian 85mm.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;despite taking no damage.&#8221;&#8230;. if it gets oneshotted then it took MASSIVE DAMAGE.<br />
Russian 85mm gun is incrdibly deadly, your tinderbox german tank has only 100mm armor at best, you think an 85 wont punch though that at less than 500m?<br />
<a href="http://tankarchives.blogspot.ca/2013/03/soviet-85-mm-guns-vs-tigers.html" rel="nofollow">http://tankarchives.blogspot.ca/2013/03/soviet-85-mm-guns-vs-tigers.html</a><br />
Target: side. Distance: 1450 m. Result: penetration, breach entrance diameter 110 mm, exit diameter 380 mm. A fragment 700 mm by 92 mm by 82 mm was knocked off. Cracks 220 mm, 200 mm, and 180 mm in length developed.&#8221;</p>
<p>that&#8217;s 1450m oneshotted by rusian 85mm&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillermo Lovato</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/1-6-2014/#comment-157026</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guillermo Lovato]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 18:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12498#comment-157026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the hemorrhage has been bigest once WTGF hit open beta, they&#039;re just in denial ofc they can&#039;t go out and say &quot;well our development and patching cycle is shit, we keep shitting our players over and over, we leave you with crippling bugs for months, we promise features that will never be delivered or on time EVER, our game mechanics are shit and our balance nonexistant&quot; &quot;but hey, the drop on the usrs is not be cause a BETTER TANK GAME IS OUT, it&#039;s because of summer.. yeah... that must be it&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the hemorrhage has been bigest once WTGF hit open beta, they&#8217;re just in denial ofc they can&#8217;t go out and say &#8220;well our development and patching cycle is shit, we keep shitting our players over and over, we leave you with crippling bugs for months, we promise features that will never be delivered or on time EVER, our game mechanics are shit and our balance nonexistant&#8221; &#8220;but hey, the drop on the usrs is not be cause a BETTER TANK GAME IS OUT, it&#8217;s because of summer.. yeah&#8230; that must be it&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillermo Lovato</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/1-6-2014/#comment-157025</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guillermo Lovato]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12498#comment-157025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[where is it &quot;shite&quot;? huh?
it has some flaws, but they fix things quick!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where is it &#8220;shite&#8221;? huh?<br />
it has some flaws, but they fix things quick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillermo Lovato</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/1-6-2014/#comment-157024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guillermo Lovato]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 18:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12498#comment-157024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[r4espawn is not limited to arcade.

what&#039;s the problem with crew system, you can easily train it by playing or you speed it up by paying, period.
Tell how different is than having to spend 100GP PER CREWMAN plus 200 more for skills to retrain EVERYTIME YOU SWITCH TANKS?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>r4espawn is not limited to arcade.</p>
<p>what&#8217;s the problem with crew system, you can easily train it by playing or you speed it up by paying, period.<br />
Tell how different is than having to spend 100GP PER CREWMAN plus 200 more for skills to retrain EVERYTIME YOU SWITCH TANKS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillermo Lovato</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/1-6-2014/#comment-157022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guillermo Lovato]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 18:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12498#comment-157022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tanks should NOT HAVE HP.
period.
that alone breaks everything]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tanks should NOT HAVE HP.<br />
period.<br />
that alone breaks everything</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
