<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Swedish Tanks – Part XII: EMIL 1951</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1951/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1951/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xelos</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1951/#comment-156601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xelos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2014 16:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12481#comment-156601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tier 8 heavy? Please tell me your joking. Try tier 9.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tier 8 heavy? Please tell me your joking. Try tier 9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imperiumgraecum</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1951/#comment-156581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[imperiumgraecum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2014 15:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12481#comment-156581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A mobile med/heavy hybrid with the size of a t44, burst firepower of French, adequate depression(propably around 8-10 degrees) and with an armored turret???

YES PLEASE]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A mobile med/heavy hybrid with the size of a t44, burst firepower of French, adequate depression(propably around 8-10 degrees) and with an armored turret???</p>
<p>YES PLEASE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr_Wycior</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1951/#comment-156564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr_Wycior]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2014 12:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12481#comment-156564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[whyboner.jpg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whyboner.jpg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Platypusbill_WoT</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1951/#comment-156562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Platypusbill_WoT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2014 12:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12481#comment-156562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In WoT terms, effetive armour (AP/APCR/HEAT) =

LFP 183/194/203
UFP 154/172/187 (though just 2 degrees of upward angle or 25 degrees of side angle ricochets AP/APCR)
Turret front 196/205/212
Gun shield looks pretty complex, but it&#039;s nominally 200mm thick
Turret cheeks 221/239/254 (http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/PZVDMwb.jpg shows ~60 degrees of horizontal angle on top of 10 degrees of vertical angle)

This thing is waaaaay overpowered for tier VIII unless it is artificially crippled with insanely poor soft stats. It has a 120mm autoloader, fast medium level mobility, great profile/camo, amazing gun depression, and strong frontal armour (the UFP is weak, but becomes irrelevant whenever it is even slightly angled or there is a little slope or obstacle to abuse), though its sides and top are paper.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In WoT terms, effetive armour (AP/APCR/HEAT) =</p>
<p>LFP 183/194/203<br />
UFP 154/172/187 (though just 2 degrees of upward angle or 25 degrees of side angle ricochets AP/APCR)<br />
Turret front 196/205/212<br />
Gun shield looks pretty complex, but it&#8217;s nominally 200mm thick<br />
Turret cheeks 221/239/254 (<a href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/PZVDMwb.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/PZVDMwb.jpg</a> shows ~60 degrees of horizontal angle on top of 10 degrees of vertical angle)</p>
<p>This thing is waaaaay overpowered for tier VIII unless it is artificially crippled with insanely poor soft stats. It has a 120mm autoloader, fast medium level mobility, great profile/camo, amazing gun depression, and strong frontal armour (the UFP is weak, but becomes irrelevant whenever it is even slightly angled or there is a little slope or obstacle to abuse), though its sides and top are paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sp15</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1951/#comment-156546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sp15]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2014 11:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12481#comment-156546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes i see your point. The vehicle really is more of a med than a heavy, but it was reffered to as a heavy and it could fill that role. And without it as a heavy we would have no tier 8 heavy for the european tree ( or the swedish tree for that matter)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes i see your point. The vehicle really is more of a med than a heavy, but it was reffered to as a heavy and it could fill that role. And without it as a heavy we would have no tier 8 heavy for the european tree ( or the swedish tree for that matter)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sp15</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1951/#comment-156545</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sp15]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2014 11:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12481#comment-156545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No silentstalker got that wrong, he even adressed that. Its the gun elevation that was14dg not the depression]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No silentstalker got that wrong, he even adressed that. Its the gun elevation that was14dg not the depression</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sp15</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1951/#comment-156543</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sp15]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2014 11:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12481#comment-156543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tanks in swedish service from this period would have been painted olive green]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tanks in swedish service from this period would have been painted olive green</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpy_Stranger</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1951/#comment-156534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grumpy_Stranger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2014 11:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12481#comment-156534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It actually does, but it&#039;s covered at the front and sides by armor plates affixed to the base of the turret, unlike the french that have the oscillating part out in the open.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It actually does, but it&#8217;s covered at the front and sides by armor plates affixed to the base of the turret, unlike the french that have the oscillating part out in the open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DemolitionDmitrij</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1951/#comment-156533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DemolitionDmitrij]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2014 10:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12481#comment-156533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Afaik AMX 50B has also 14deg gundepression. Only WG decided to not give a fuck about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Afaik AMX 50B has also 14deg gundepression. Only WG decided to not give a fuck about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr_clark</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/01/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1951/#comment-156523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mr_clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2014 10:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12481#comment-156523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking at the stats I somehow rather see it as a T9 Medium in WoT Terms. If the gun was weaker then maybe a T8 med.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the stats I somehow rather see it as a T9 Medium in WoT Terms. If the gun was weaker then maybe a T8 med.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
