Comments on: 5.6.2014

By: macmac

macmac — Fri, 06 Jun 2014 07:20:58 +0000

Storm confirms that in 9.1, they fixed the FPS drops when switching to sniper mode while the terrain is not on highest quality setting FIIINALYYYYYYYY that szhoud be fix long time ago now i meaby dont ned do download 3% texutes and go on “max” textures now i can on lowest and dont have this fps drops.

By: Nord1ing (NA)

Nord1ing (NA) — Fri, 06 Jun 2014 05:30:27 +0000

Lineage 2 is partialy client-side and hackable using packets replacement with l2phx, f.ex.

By: Nord1ing (NA)

Nord1ing (NA) — Fri, 06 Jun 2014 05:17:21 +0000

You overestimate havoc, since it will be client side only there will be 0 influence on gameplay.

By: nixxxie

nixxxie — Fri, 06 Jun 2014 03:03:44 +0000

>> – Storm confirms that in 9.1, they fixed the FPS drops when switching to sniper mode while the terrain is not on highest quality setting

There is a mod that fixes this.

By: nononononono

nononononono — Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:33:55 +0000

Yes, it is horrible. Please continue playing WoT :D

By: Crate

Crate — Thu, 05 Jun 2014 23:08:27 +0000

- Storm confirms that in 9.1, they fixed the FPS drops when switching to sniper mode while the terrain is not on highest quality setting

Strangely enough for me FPS has been going *up* whenever switching to sniper mode since 9.0.1.

By: Bugii

Bugii — Thu, 05 Jun 2014 21:51:17 +0000

Am I the only one who doesnt like WT graphics at all ?
sure, model looks good, but thats it.. everything else is garbage, lack of details….

maps look really empty, lack details… sure there is shitload of trees… but then again.. if you play 100 matches and then see a screenshot, you dont know where exactly on the map was it taken …

btw, that engine by itself is terrible,.. tanks are like on ice, you get stuck every second somewhere, you can clip yourself into wall or dead tank, two similar trees and you can run over one, while the other one is like indestructible wall.
That game is garbage. Feels more like alpha than beta version.

By: Bugii

Bugii — Thu, 05 Jun 2014 21:44:02 +0000

just saying why we want to see havok ingame.
I’ve got GTX770M (mobile card) … which is performance similar to yours… mine too runs 35-45 fps depending on map, however mostly everything maxed out. Strange.

important to note here… more data traffic will never affect your fps.
Sure it can lag if your internet connection is poor, but the number of frames rendered by your GPU will be the same. fps has nothing to do with data traffic.

Then again, I can run battlefield 4 with incredible graphics, good physics, 64 players in match all maxed out at 55-60fps 15ms ping (depending on the server) …

Thats WHY we are asking to implement havok…. because it is possible.
If we stop asking devs to do something, they wont do it… Why should they improve something if customers are okay with what they already have…

By: UNDEAD_DC

UNDEAD_DC — Thu, 05 Jun 2014 19:37:17 +0000

They show very very nice things… look at the trailers there they “show” you. .
Well have you ever seen tank push car away?

By: OttoVon Bismarck

OttoVon Bismarck — Thu, 05 Jun 2014 19:36:07 +0000

I left mostly because of the playerbase, the continuous need to win but the teams which made it hard to do so leading to hours of playing to get the first victory of the day with each tank. Sure, Havok wouldn’t change that, but I’d play for a while to see every new feature and I’d play every historical battle with each tank I have for it.