<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tier 10 Tanks Left to Implement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/05/tier-10-tanks-left-to-implement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/05/tier-10-tanks-left-to-implement/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bennybear</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/05/tier-10-tanks-left-to-implement/#comment-158351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bennybear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 02:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12663#comment-158351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a comment and a few questions...

I think an American light off the Chaffee should be coming, and while they are at it it they can fix this light-medium-heavy line that goes to the T57 heavy.  I like FTR quite a bit, thanks for doing this blog,  Is there a T7 American TD coming anytime soon I heard about one awhile ago but have missed the updates on that.  I have gold saved to buy one.  I used to wonder how people play with low fps but lately I am lagging majorly.  my fps hasn&#039;t changed and even shows higher but my ping has jumped to 70-95 ms anyone else notice this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a comment and a few questions&#8230;</p>
<p>I think an American light off the Chaffee should be coming, and while they are at it it they can fix this light-medium-heavy line that goes to the T57 heavy.  I like FTR quite a bit, thanks for doing this blog,  Is there a T7 American TD coming anytime soon I heard about one awhile ago but have missed the updates on that.  I have gold saved to buy one.  I used to wonder how people play with low fps but lately I am lagging majorly.  my fps hasn&#8217;t changed and even shows higher but my ping has jumped to 70-95 ms anyone else notice this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xardas47 .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/05/tier-10-tanks-left-to-implement/#comment-158274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xardas47 .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 18:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12663#comment-158274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About that unknow canidate on Japanese heavy tank .... a long long time ago there was a topic aimed exactly at this theme and one of the most possible candidates shoudl be the O-I superheavy tank series http://japan.greyfalcon.us/O.htm  with the codename  O-I EXPERIMENTAL ULTRA-HEAVY TANK which looks like a KV-5 on steroids to me. But I guess u are more informed than me so i might be wrong .... but damn it sure looks nice next to the Maus I woudl like to have one of these. http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-58qDrcl9U70/UXG_1KEKCGI/AAAAAAAABzc/bywyJMsrl8E/s1600/O-I_Maus.JPG]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About that unknow canidate on Japanese heavy tank &#8230;. a long long time ago there was a topic aimed exactly at this theme and one of the most possible candidates shoudl be the O-I superheavy tank series <a href="http://japan.greyfalcon.us/O.htm" rel="nofollow">http://japan.greyfalcon.us/O.htm</a>  with the codename  O-I EXPERIMENTAL ULTRA-HEAVY TANK which looks like a KV-5 on steroids to me. But I guess u are more informed than me so i might be wrong &#8230;. but damn it sure looks nice next to the Maus I woudl like to have one of these. <a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-58qDrcl9U70/UXG_1KEKCGI/AAAAAAAABzc/bywyJMsrl8E/s1600/O-I_Maus.JPG" rel="nofollow">http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-58qDrcl9U70/UXG_1KEKCGI/AAAAAAAABzc/bywyJMsrl8E/s1600/O-I_Maus.JPG</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMSBC</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/05/tier-10-tanks-left-to-implement/#comment-158225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SMSBC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 15:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12663#comment-158225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[how terrible]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how terrible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karika</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/05/tier-10-tanks-left-to-implement/#comment-158070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karika]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 08:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12663#comment-158070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It won&#039;t differ too much from the T57 HT, which is already in the game. Do we need another one autoloading heavy?
Plus unlike the WT E-100, it would have strong hull armor AND turret armor. IMO too strong. It&#039;ll be the strongest tier 10 tank, everybody will take that to matches, and 15 T58s versus 15 T58s is not going to be too much fun..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It won&#8217;t differ too much from the T57 HT, which is already in the game. Do we need another one autoloading heavy?<br />
Plus unlike the WT E-100, it would have strong hull armor AND turret armor. IMO too strong. It&#8217;ll be the strongest tier 10 tank, everybody will take that to matches, and 15 T58s versus 15 T58s is not going to be too much fun..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Mesiroff</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/05/tier-10-tanks-left-to-implement/#comment-158047</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad Mesiroff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 03:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12663#comment-158047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry but the T95 would most def not be like a &quot;Patton&quot; generally in game at all.

In fact numbers and size wise the T95 would play much more similiar to a Obj 140, and the gun had a Semi-SmoothBore version that would be used.

The Armor on the Ford tank would have been 4.67 inches @65 degrees with Glass Armor that in individual pltes defeated Rockets 3x there capacity. 

So take away the Glass Armor and still you have a 121mm @ 65 degree [for 80% of the frontal area] beast tank that had a 720 proposed HP motor and a gun that had similar pen to the M58 120mm but 50% faster loading all in a very low to the ground sleek package. 

Think more like STB looks and speed with Fv4202 Hull Armor and a to balance it would have only 240 Alpha but 260 Pen and laser like.....

This is not like a Patton in any way shape or form. And in reality this project wasnt a failure of Tech but a failure of the US`s retardation in thinking they didnt need a &quot;Advanced&quot; all in one tank, when it could have M103 Pattons and Bulldogs doing its job.....They didnt want to make the best tank ever because it was putting to much into one unit. But the tank itself exceeded almost all expectations, except budget.....Also it didnt help the only 12 factories that could manf it was the poorer states unable to pay washington lobbiast the most.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry but the T95 would most def not be like a &#8220;Patton&#8221; generally in game at all.</p>
<p>In fact numbers and size wise the T95 would play much more similiar to a Obj 140, and the gun had a Semi-SmoothBore version that would be used.</p>
<p>The Armor on the Ford tank would have been 4.67 inches @65 degrees with Glass Armor that in individual pltes defeated Rockets 3x there capacity. </p>
<p>So take away the Glass Armor and still you have a 121mm @ 65 degree [for 80% of the frontal area] beast tank that had a 720 proposed HP motor and a gun that had similar pen to the M58 120mm but 50% faster loading all in a very low to the ground sleek package. </p>
<p>Think more like STB looks and speed with Fv4202 Hull Armor and a to balance it would have only 240 Alpha but 260 Pen and laser like&#8230;..</p>
<p>This is not like a Patton in any way shape or form. And in reality this project wasnt a failure of Tech but a failure of the US`s retardation in thinking they didnt need a &#8220;Advanced&#8221; all in one tank, when it could have M103 Pattons and Bulldogs doing its job&#8230;..They didnt want to make the best tank ever because it was putting to much into one unit. But the tank itself exceeded almost all expectations, except budget&#8230;..Also it didnt help the only 12 factories that could manf it was the poorer states unable to pay washington lobbiast the most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texshi Barrett</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/05/tier-10-tanks-left-to-implement/#comment-158043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texshi Barrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 02:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12663#comment-158043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To bad two tier tens are fucking reward bullshit godforbid the tanks i want are added for reg tree but noo]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To bad two tier tens are fucking reward bullshit godforbid the tanks i want are added for reg tree but noo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leedar</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/05/tier-10-tanks-left-to-implement/#comment-158040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leedar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12663#comment-158040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[European (besides current nations, excl. France - needs real HTs and more MTs) &amp; Japanese would be best for variety&#039;s sake, but I disagree T95 be &#039;roughly like the M48&#039;. It is lower (better camo) and faster.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>European (besides current nations, excl. France &#8211; needs real HTs and more MTs) &amp; Japanese would be best for variety&#8217;s sake, but I disagree T95 be &#8216;roughly like the M48&#8242;. It is lower (better camo) and faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schepel</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/05/tier-10-tanks-left-to-implement/#comment-158036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schepel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12663#comment-158036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The French do not really care for people digging through their top secret stuff - even if it is outdated. Research on pre WW2 tanks is frowned upon, anything more recent and you may have your balls attached to the nearest power source in preparation of a firing squad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The French do not really care for people digging through their top secret stuff &#8211; even if it is outdated. Research on pre WW2 tanks is frowned upon, anything more recent and you may have your balls attached to the nearest power source in preparation of a firing squad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheckerol</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/05/tier-10-tanks-left-to-implement/#comment-158035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sheckerol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2014 23:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12663#comment-158035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[with all the whining that goes on about deathstar and wt auf e100s I am surprised no one whines about kv 2, in fact most seem to love it even though it is the same theory and design just four tiers lower]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with all the whining that goes on about deathstar and wt auf e100s I am surprised no one whines about kv 2, in fact most seem to love it even though it is the same theory and design just four tiers lower</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheckerol</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/05/tier-10-tanks-left-to-implement/#comment-158034</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sheckerol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2014 23:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12663#comment-158034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah, poor heavy drivers that lose a potential 1000 health once every minute to a tank that has 1.00 or worse accuracy, kv2 aim time and the slowest shell in the game]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, poor heavy drivers that lose a potential 1000 health once every minute to a tank that has 1.00 or worse accuracy, kv2 aim time and the slowest shell in the game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
