<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6.6.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/06/6-6-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/06/6-6-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medjed</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/06/6-6-2014/#comment-159217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medjed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 20:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12735#comment-159217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe if he wouldn&#039;t write in douchebag english that can be understood only by native speakers i would give a fuck about it. And since he was my long time fan who couldn&#039;t miss any of my posts i assumed he might be refering to my post. I did however issued my apology if i&#039;m wrong however which later turned out to be the case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe if he wouldn&#8217;t write in douchebag english that can be understood only by native speakers i would give a fuck about it. And since he was my long time fan who couldn&#8217;t miss any of my posts i assumed he might be refering to my post. I did however issued my apology if i&#8217;m wrong however which later turned out to be the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zippy99</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/06/6-6-2014/#comment-158451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zippy99]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 13:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12735#comment-158451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great more nerfs, more screwing with accuracy! 
I think WOT needs to remove everything above tier 1 and start over, as they can&#039;t get their act together at all.
Of course they aren&#039;t going to refund your credits or XP if they do!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great more nerfs, more screwing with accuracy!<br />
I think WOT needs to remove everything above tier 1 and start over, as they can&#8217;t get their act together at all.<br />
Of course they aren&#8217;t going to refund your credits or XP if they do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarsAttacks</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/06/6-6-2014/#comment-158434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MarsAttacks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 12:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12735#comment-158434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree. The current accuracy setup allows snap shot shooting more than most players know. I have no issue doing a snapshot in most any tank and hitting 50% of the time. So reducing the accuracy model is going to put the brakes on that. 

So many things need to be fixed in this game. Better and bigger maps to increase the options for attack and defense.  Fix the spotting and render range mechanics. Add even the smallest amount of skills into the MM equations (big one here) just to keep the game balance to a 60%-40% statistical chance to win range. Bottling, team killer, and AFK bans for repeat offenders. Etc.......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. The current accuracy setup allows snap shot shooting more than most players know. I have no issue doing a snapshot in most any tank and hitting 50% of the time. So reducing the accuracy model is going to put the brakes on that. </p>
<p>So many things need to be fixed in this game. Better and bigger maps to increase the options for attack and defense.  Fix the spotting and render range mechanics. Add even the smallest amount of skills into the MM equations (big one here) just to keep the game balance to a 60%-40% statistical chance to win range. Bottling, team killer, and AFK bans for repeat offenders. Etc&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ErwinSmith</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/06/6-6-2014/#comment-158413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ErwinSmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 09:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12735#comment-158413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No. The general TD nerf will have no effect on anything except for players who have no idea how the spotting system works. You will still be able to stay invisible while firing as long as you dont park yourself right behind the bush. I dont quite understand how camo after firing affects the aggressiveness either. When youre being aggressive with a TD, you fully expect to be spotted after you fire anyway. 

Agree with the rest, though...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. The general TD nerf will have no effect on anything except for players who have no idea how the spotting system works. You will still be able to stay invisible while firing as long as you dont park yourself right behind the bush. I dont quite understand how camo after firing affects the aggressiveness either. When youre being aggressive with a TD, you fully expect to be spotted after you fire anyway. </p>
<p>Agree with the rest, though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mondog</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/06/6-6-2014/#comment-158375</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mondog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 08:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12735#comment-158375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, they said popularity was an indication that it may need a nerf. Even then they don&#039;t act on that, the kv1s is a good example.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, they said popularity was an indication that it may need a nerf. Even then they don&#8217;t act on that, the kv1s is a good example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roflman</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/06/6-6-2014/#comment-158361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roflman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 07:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12735#comment-158361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Same goes with artillery in close range battle. It&#039;s better to shoot right after you have turned face front against opponent coming at you rather than wait and aim sometime before firing. Might be also that bad players are given high coeffiecients for &quot;aiming&quot; so they can spin like crazy with their arty and always hit without aiming in close range.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same goes with artillery in close range battle. It&#8217;s better to shoot right after you have turned face front against opponent coming at you rather than wait and aim sometime before firing. Might be also that bad players are given high coeffiecients for &#8220;aiming&#8221; so they can spin like crazy with their arty and always hit without aiming in close range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pimpelmeesje</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/06/6-6-2014/#comment-158359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pimpelmeesje]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 06:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12735#comment-158359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like it&#039;s done when it&#039;s done...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like it&#8217;s done when it&#8217;s done&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexter5021</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/06/6-6-2014/#comment-158356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dexter5021]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 05:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12735#comment-158356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My bro had an RNG shot with KV-2 (90% crew no vents) in Malinovka - his shot goes through a small window and oneshotted a 100% HP enemy KV-2 (you can watch this in Woras&#039; RNG vid, dont remember wich one)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bro had an RNG shot with KV-2 (90% crew no vents) in Malinovka &#8211; his shot goes through a small window and oneshotted a 100% HP enemy KV-2 (you can watch this in Woras&#8217; RNG vid, dont remember wich one)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PowerDonkey</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/06/6-6-2014/#comment-158354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PowerDonkey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 04:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12735#comment-158354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NO, nerfs are necessary. But as I said, the general TD nerf will have huge impact on spotting and reduce the possibility to play aggressive with TDs, so the hellcat. What will happen with the nerfs we saw, in addition, the hellcat will be another TD camping the bush near a rock somewhere shooting you from the off. Why even bother and take a forward spot, get a first shot off and relocate, when you now need 25% longer to even get to speed, not to speak about max speed on non-street terrain ever? You just won&#039;t. Nerfing, yes. But butchering the tank to bring it &quot;in line&quot; with the shit that nobody wants to play on T6? No, thank you. Then rather buff other tanks. But it is easier that way, I&#039;m sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO, nerfs are necessary. But as I said, the general TD nerf will have huge impact on spotting and reduce the possibility to play aggressive with TDs, so the hellcat. What will happen with the nerfs we saw, in addition, the hellcat will be another TD camping the bush near a rock somewhere shooting you from the off. Why even bother and take a forward spot, get a first shot off and relocate, when you now need 25% longer to even get to speed, not to speak about max speed on non-street terrain ever? You just won&#8217;t. Nerfing, yes. But butchering the tank to bring it &#8220;in line&#8221; with the shit that nobody wants to play on T6? No, thank you. Then rather buff other tanks. But it is easier that way, I&#8217;m sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conagor</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/06/6-6-2014/#comment-158352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conagor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 02:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=12735#comment-158352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[accuracy nerf? LOL, this is the most retarded idea for a long time! 
as there were any really accurate guns in the game... 

the most annoying thing in WoT is to miss fully aimed shots! 

why the fuck they always nerf the good tanks?? better way would be to buff the weak tanks, this would be much more satisfying for all players!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>accuracy nerf? LOL, this is the most retarded idea for a long time!<br />
as there were any really accurate guns in the game&#8230; </p>
<p>the most annoying thing in WoT is to miss fully aimed shots! </p>
<p>why the fuck they always nerf the good tanks?? better way would be to buff the weak tanks, this would be much more satisfying for all players!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
