Comments on: 10.6.2014

By: Astronus

Astronus — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:08:56 +0000

What is very interesting with professional liars like Storm and other WG-Staff – it’s very complicated to keep the overview of all lies erver told.

Remember of the lags? When we were told “There are no lags”, “We are investigating the lags” to “The lags are caused by the Olympic games” and ended with “we have no lags”.

Now, Storm (remember, the best engineer WG has…. sad enough….) states: “apparently, 9.1 has some issues with quitting the battle to the hangar, the game gets somehow stuck – Storm states that this is connected to the high traffic, where the game sends a large packet of data with game results and the packet sometimes doesn’t get through properly”
Storm states that this is connected to high traffic – I thought we do not have a problem with high traffic as the game servers have enough ressources to deal with more than 200k players (currently arround 100k!).
Storm also states, there might be packets “sometimes doesn’t get through properly” – meaning, there are packet losses.

Very funny, first this moron tried to tell us, there are no lags and if there are any lags, it’s the fault of the customer.
And now when one of the next problems got high priority, they try to excuse their permanent failing with packetlosses – something that can’t happen according to Storm some weeks ago?

Hell yeah, only smart people is working for WG – total trustworthy :)

By: ThePegasus1979

ThePegasus1979 — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:37:50 +0000

How large is the patch?

By: ThePegasus1979

ThePegasus1979 — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 06:12:08 +0000

Can anyone explain me that topic regarding the map loading times? I simply never expierenced that e.g. with 9.0. I am right in the game when the timer is at ~54-57 seconds. Is there any specific Map and/or game mode affected?

By: LeMalina

LeMalina — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 05:06:35 +0000

Is it me or WG is solving same bugs over and over again…and when they solve it new bug appears but after patch or two the old bug reappears. And do you have this bug…When I play and tank is destroyed somewhere on the map far from me (I cant even see destroyed tank)…that cloud of smoke when tank is destroyed appears next to my tank in the air like the tank is destroyed next to me…

By: Iron_Tsunami

Iron_Tsunami — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 01:32:42 +0000

“Storm: ‘We didn’t do anything with map loading’”

Right… You also didn’t do anything to any of the models you screwed up in the past like the Borsig or Valentine, yet those were obviously bugged. Perhaps have a quick chat with your employees? Who knows what kind of stuff goes on behind your back.

By: themuddyside

themuddyside — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 01:03:15 +0000

Good point, Alex :)

By: lemonizzle

lemonizzle — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:47:22 +0000

It’s the interface appearing on screen, aim circle, list of tanks, your hp and damage indicator etc.
i think it’s necessary to enable it, even if it decreases fps… :/

By: skacekachna

skacekachna — Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:32:22 +0000

The resource eating crap is only reason we have UI mods. Doubt there would be any if modding UI wasn’t so easy.

By: Ultrasonic2

Ultrasonic2 — Tue, 10 Jun 2014 22:43:47 +0000

User Interface

stuff like the mini map and how much ammo you have and stuff

By: Nicolas Eggers

Nicolas Eggers — Tue, 10 Jun 2014 22:27:31 +0000

Even though some might not like the idea they just need to have HB were you queue up and it puts you into a set tank setup for each battle that you have open to you to fill. This would salve some of the balancing issues and some of the queue times. True you still would have those people who complain on not getting the tank they want but once people got used to it things should be fine.