<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Preliminary Comparison of &#8220;Light T-54&#8243; and Type 59</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/14/preliminary-comparison-of-light-t-54-and-type-59/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/14/preliminary-comparison-of-light-t-54-and-type-59/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pootchy</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/14/preliminary-comparison-of-light-t-54-and-type-59/#comment-162280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pootchy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 07:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13116#comment-162280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most important part:

-5 vs -7 degrees gun depression..
nothing more to say..

if u got a tank with bad gun depression.. it has to much better in mobility aspects...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most important part:</p>
<p>-5 vs -7 degrees gun depression..<br />
nothing more to say..</p>
<p>if u got a tank with bad gun depression.. it has to much better in mobility aspects&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/14/preliminary-comparison-of-light-t-54-and-type-59/#comment-162199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2014 21:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13116#comment-162199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Rakyth

I will wait and see whether you will realize why noobmeter is not useful in this case.
The answer is simple. Lets see whether you will find it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rakyth</p>
<p>I will wait and see whether you will realize why noobmeter is not useful in this case.<br />
The answer is simple. Lets see whether you will find it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/14/preliminary-comparison-of-light-t-54-and-type-59/#comment-162197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13116#comment-162197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He is worth my time.
All people in the world are worth it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is worth my time.<br />
All people in the world are worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/14/preliminary-comparison-of-light-t-54-and-type-59/#comment-162196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13116#comment-162196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;objectivity&quot;
Is not seen here and definitely not from you nor Rakyth.

BTW, I am QUITE a bit better in T-44... nerf it if you want to teach me humility.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;objectivity&#8221;<br />
Is not seen here and definitely not from you nor Rakyth.</p>
<p>BTW, I am QUITE a bit better in T-44&#8230; nerf it if you want to teach me humility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/14/preliminary-comparison-of-light-t-54-and-type-59/#comment-162194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13116#comment-162194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And Jtiger.

Also, AGAIN you are forgetting that back then IS-7 did not hav 240mm frontal armor at seam.
AND that normalization was HIGHER.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Jtiger.</p>
<p>Also, AGAIN you are forgetting that back then IS-7 did not hav 240mm frontal armor at seam.<br />
AND that normalization was HIGHER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xidex</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/14/preliminary-comparison-of-light-t-54-and-type-59/#comment-162100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xidex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2014 12:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13116#comment-162100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2k atm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2k atm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xidex</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/14/preliminary-comparison-of-light-t-54-and-type-59/#comment-162099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xidex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2014 12:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13116#comment-162099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nope.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiflajiq</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/14/preliminary-comparison-of-light-t-54-and-type-59/#comment-162063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kiflajiq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2014 10:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13116#comment-162063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, good old times...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, good old times&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rakyth</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/14/preliminary-comparison-of-light-t-54-and-type-59/#comment-162053</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rakyth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2014 09:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13116#comment-162053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the mobility or bad D10T soft stats are buffed up just a little, this will be a perfect &#039;premium&#039; tank: not invulnerable, enough to do well in as a newbie, to have fun in as a pro, and to have credits for all.

Otherwise, I don&#039;t see it doing too well. 17 hp/ton is good, but, not enough. 20 would be too powerful--it would replace the T-44. I would say, 0.8/0.9/1.7 terrain resistance. 0.9/1/1.8, at the very least.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the mobility or bad D10T soft stats are buffed up just a little, this will be a perfect &#8216;premium&#8217; tank: not invulnerable, enough to do well in as a newbie, to have fun in as a pro, and to have credits for all.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I don&#8217;t see it doing too well. 17 hp/ton is good, but, not enough. 20 would be too powerful&#8211;it would replace the T-44. I would say, 0.8/0.9/1.7 terrain resistance. 0.9/1/1.8, at the very least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rakyth</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/14/preliminary-comparison-of-light-t-54-and-type-59/#comment-162036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rakyth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2014 07:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13116#comment-162036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.noobmeter.com/tankStats/

According to this, the global average winrate for said premium tank is 53.1%. This average includes all Type 59 players, half of which *must* be tomatoes for the 60,000 game unicums to exist. It has the highest averaged OP rating. It has a higher average winrate of all tier 8 medium tanks, bar the newest two, the STA-1 and Object 416. 

If it can only &#039;beat&#039; two medium tanks, then, why is its winrate so high? The T-34-2 is one of the rarest tanks to see, with a low number of recent battles and second to lowest total battles. The T-44 is much more played, but can only account for the smallest fraction of the play the Type 59 has seen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.noobmeter.com/tankStats/" rel="nofollow">http://www.noobmeter.com/tankStats/</a></p>
<p>According to this, the global average winrate for said premium tank is 53.1%. This average includes all Type 59 players, half of which *must* be tomatoes for the 60,000 game unicums to exist. It has the highest averaged OP rating. It has a higher average winrate of all tier 8 medium tanks, bar the newest two, the STA-1 and Object 416. </p>
<p>If it can only &#8216;beat&#8217; two medium tanks, then, why is its winrate so high? The T-34-2 is one of the rarest tanks to see, with a low number of recent battles and second to lowest total battles. The T-44 is much more played, but can only account for the smallest fraction of the play the Type 59 has seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
