<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Firefly Line</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/on-the-firefly-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/on-the-firefly-line/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Doorknob</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/on-the-firefly-line/#comment-162676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rusty Doorknob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 09:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13165#comment-162676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, we&#039;ll be getting a lot of 17 pounders :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, we&#8217;ll be getting a lot of 17 pounders :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starblade7</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/on-the-firefly-line/#comment-162605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Starblade7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 02:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13165#comment-162605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In light of this information, I&#039;ve drawn up a revised British tech tree, to speculate at how this might look when implemented (plus a few ideas of my own). Colours indicate tank class.
http://imgur.com/WQaTVWc

- added the LL line, ending with the turreted British TDs.
- added Archer and Achilles TDs as precursors to the turreted TDs. (Why the Archer was not originally in the TD line escapes me, as it would be more historical than the AT prototypes.)
- added a half-line with a mix of light tanks and prototypes, ending with the FV301, which is an excellent candidate for a Chaffee-esque LT (fast, good gun, paper armour).
- Sentinel AC4 as a tier 6 premium tank with the 17-pdr.
- FV4202 replaced with Vickers MBT and moved to tier 8 premium, rebalanced with actual 105mm gun.
- Unhistorical FV215b replaced with Chieftan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In light of this information, I&#8217;ve drawn up a revised British tech tree, to speculate at how this might look when implemented (plus a few ideas of my own). Colours indicate tank class.<br />
<a href="http://imgur.com/WQaTVWc" rel="nofollow">http://imgur.com/WQaTVWc</a></p>
<p>- added the LL line, ending with the turreted British TDs.<br />
- added Archer and Achilles TDs as precursors to the turreted TDs. (Why the Archer was not originally in the TD line escapes me, as it would be more historical than the AT prototypes.)<br />
- added a half-line with a mix of light tanks and prototypes, ending with the FV301, which is an excellent candidate for a Chaffee-esque LT (fast, good gun, paper armour).<br />
- Sentinel AC4 as a tier 6 premium tank with the 17-pdr.<br />
- FV4202 replaced with Vickers MBT and moved to tier 8 premium, rebalanced with actual 105mm gun.<br />
- Unhistorical FV215b replaced with Chieftan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedShocktrooper</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/on-the-firefly-line/#comment-162598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RedShocktrooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13165#comment-162598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or, you know, players complaining for a year and a half about the Hellcat being OP.

They&#039;re still waffling on what to do with the KV-1S, if the Hellcat gets a nerf then that might be a sign that they&#039;re, you know, actually going to try and do something about the 1S at some point?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, you know, players complaining for a year and a half about the Hellcat being OP.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re still waffling on what to do with the KV-1S, if the Hellcat gets a nerf then that might be a sign that they&#8217;re, you know, actually going to try and do something about the 1S at some point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mao</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/on-the-firefly-line/#comment-162589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 22:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13165#comment-162589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If that&#039;s how you understood my logic, sir, you got problems. No point in explaining logic to a individual with issues. Have a nice day!

P.S. I pity you :(
P.S.S. ironhidex got the essential.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that&#8217;s how you understood my logic, sir, you got problems. No point in explaining logic to a individual with issues. Have a nice day!</p>
<p>P.S. I pity you :(<br />
P.S.S. ironhidex got the essential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Almond</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/on-the-firefly-line/#comment-162584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Almond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 21:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13165#comment-162584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So they introduce bullshit German autoloader but completely ignore actual British auto loader designs?  Fuck you WG.  The Conway and 4005 stage 2 are shit in WOT terms, and you wonder why nobody uses the British lines, lazy shits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they introduce bullshit German autoloader but completely ignore actual British auto loader designs?  Fuck you WG.  The Conway and 4005 stage 2 are shit in WOT terms, and you wonder why nobody uses the British lines, lazy shits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Variente</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/on-the-firefly-line/#comment-162582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Variente]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 21:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13165#comment-162582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[they should&#039;ve put the stage 1 in, 183mm auto loader, would&#039;ve been fun.... 1 clip 1 top gun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they should&#8217;ve put the stage 1 in, 183mm auto loader, would&#8217;ve been fun&#8230;. 1 clip 1 top gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nico203</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/on-the-firefly-line/#comment-162578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nico203]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 21:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13165#comment-162578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay SS told in another poster that there will be the achilles]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay SS told in another poster that there will be the achilles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iron_Tsunami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/on-the-firefly-line/#comment-162574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iron_Tsunami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13165#comment-162574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[:(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iron_Tsunami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/on-the-firefly-line/#comment-162573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iron_Tsunami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13165#comment-162573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wait, so if the Challenger is a medium and the Avenger is a TD, assuming that the Avenger will be the elited form of the Challenger, what class does that make this vehicle? Medium or TD? Or will they be separate sister vehicles on the same tier like perhaps having the Cromwell branch off to the Challenger which connects back into the Firefly line at the Avenger?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, so if the Challenger is a medium and the Avenger is a TD, assuming that the Avenger will be the elited form of the Challenger, what class does that make this vehicle? Medium or TD? Or will they be separate sister vehicles on the same tier like perhaps having the Cromwell branch off to the Challenger which connects back into the Firefly line at the Avenger?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TankaTed</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/on-the-firefly-line/#comment-162572</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TankaTed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13165#comment-162572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let the HESH spam double!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let the HESH spam double!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
