<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ukraine Armor Chaos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/ukraine-armor-chaos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/ukraine-armor-chaos/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunther Borg</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/ukraine-armor-chaos/#comment-162732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gunther Borg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13174#comment-162732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nevermind]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nevermind</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Septfox Malkier</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/ukraine-armor-chaos/#comment-162592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Septfox Malkier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 23:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13174#comment-162592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is what I thought. I was under the impression that anything not locked safely in a military depot or something at least had the gun disabled in some way (breech welded shut or cut off completely, barrel plugged shut, etc). Do they only do this sort of thing under certain circumstances?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what I thought. I was under the impression that anything not locked safely in a military depot or something at least had the gun disabled in some way (breech welded shut or cut off completely, barrel plugged shut, etc). Do they only do this sort of thing under certain circumstances?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Septfox Malkier</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/ukraine-armor-chaos/#comment-162591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Septfox Malkier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 23:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13174#comment-162591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mm. By way of partial explanation, and keeping in mind I&#039;m not a professional mechanic or anything...

There&#039;s a lot of overlap (i.e. at least one piston is still going through its power stroke when the next fires) with that many cylinders, once you get one cylinder to fire and kick the engine over, you don&#039;t need all that many to immediately follow suit to get the engine running free of the starter. Once it&#039;s running under its own power, it&#039;s just a matter of keeping it at high idle and waiting until it&#039;s warmed enough to be running on all cylinders. Assuming, of course, the issue is cold-temperedness (I&#039;d expect a monument tank&#039;s engine to be a bit worse off, at least some moisture trapped in the cylinders). 

On the other hand, an l4 has no firing overlap (i.e. only one piston is going through its power stroke at a time with a short pause between each firing, there&#039;s a certain pulsation to the delivered power as a result), so...two of your cylinders refuse to fire cold, you&#039;re lucky to get it idling (depending on their place in the firing order, but still, that&#039;s a 50% loss). Three down, you&#039;re done. I can personally say that missing just one cylinder makes for a very, very rough idle in an (older, 2.5L) l4.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mm. By way of partial explanation, and keeping in mind I&#8217;m not a professional mechanic or anything&#8230;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot of overlap (i.e. at least one piston is still going through its power stroke when the next fires) with that many cylinders, once you get one cylinder to fire and kick the engine over, you don&#8217;t need all that many to immediately follow suit to get the engine running free of the starter. Once it&#8217;s running under its own power, it&#8217;s just a matter of keeping it at high idle and waiting until it&#8217;s warmed enough to be running on all cylinders. Assuming, of course, the issue is cold-temperedness (I&#8217;d expect a monument tank&#8217;s engine to be a bit worse off, at least some moisture trapped in the cylinders). </p>
<p>On the other hand, an l4 has no firing overlap (i.e. only one piston is going through its power stroke at a time with a short pause between each firing, there&#8217;s a certain pulsation to the delivered power as a result), so&#8230;two of your cylinders refuse to fire cold, you&#8217;re lucky to get it idling (depending on their place in the firing order, but still, that&#8217;s a 50% loss). Three down, you&#8217;re done. I can personally say that missing just one cylinder makes for a very, very rough idle in an (older, 2.5L) l4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DSHK</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/ukraine-armor-chaos/#comment-162588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DSHK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 22:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13174#comment-162588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please notice that it says&quot;Built in 1943,retired in 1945,and placed on the pedestal in 1994,the mighty diesel engine....&quot; the subject of this sentence is &quot;diesel engine&quot;instead of the tank]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please notice that it says&#8221;Built in 1943,retired in 1945,and placed on the pedestal in 1994,the mighty diesel engine&#8230;.&#8221; the subject of this sentence is &#8220;diesel engine&#8221;instead of the tank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kena</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/ukraine-armor-chaos/#comment-162579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kena]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 21:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13174#comment-162579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never forget that infamous headline from many years ago.

&quot;BAN THESE EVIL VIDEO GAMES.&quot;

The mail is the last place you should look for reliable journalism. It&#039;s nearing the level of Russia Today Online and PressTV.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never forget that infamous headline from many years ago.</p>
<p>&#8220;BAN THESE EVIL VIDEO GAMES.&#8221;</p>
<p>The mail is the last place you should look for reliable journalism. It&#8217;s nearing the level of Russia Today Online and PressTV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homer_J</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/ukraine-armor-chaos/#comment-162570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Homer_J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13174#comment-162570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tut tut SS. 

What next? Getting WoT news from the WoT EU team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tut tut SS. </p>
<p>What next? Getting WoT news from the WoT EU team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delta0071</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/ukraine-armor-chaos/#comment-162560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Delta0071]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 19:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13174#comment-162560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It says the engine is built in 1943...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It says the engine is built in 1943&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nixxxie</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/ukraine-armor-chaos/#comment-162505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nixxxie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13174#comment-162505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, V12 is easier to start than your small car L4 or even L3... Even that big, it&#039;s a bit counterintuitive :) but true.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, V12 is easier to start than your small car L4 or even L3&#8230; Even that big, it&#8217;s a bit counterintuitive :) but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medjed</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/ukraine-armor-chaos/#comment-162480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medjed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13174#comment-162480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to self: Don&#039;t use DailyMail as a resource again. At least that&#039;s why i learned from all the comments. I&#039;m sure SS did too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to self: Don&#8217;t use DailyMail as a resource again. At least that&#8217;s why i learned from all the comments. I&#8217;m sure SS did too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunt3r</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/16/ukraine-armor-chaos/#comment-162478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hunt3r]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13174#comment-162478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe thats why there trying to revive old weapons cause obviously there not advanced :P

though if they used that IS-3 that would just be hilarious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe thats why there trying to revive old weapons cause obviously there not advanced :P</p>
<p>though if they used that IS-3 that would just be hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
